Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Wyróżnienie
1600959484705.png


Remember when we spent several years ruining lives by labeling the OK symbol a racist dogwhistle?
 
Slap47 powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 1618250

Remember when we spent several years ruining lives by labeling the OK symbol a racist dogwhistle?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

And another tool is thrown under the bus in a desperate ploy to keep Biden from doddering under it. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that they were this desperate to win this election, I really, honestly expected them to make a token effort and try again next time.
 
a9a6ecd194f7f6b61ff8661acbf3d6ed.png
a739a550372690d903c31927f2153f0c.png


The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
 
It's HK-47 powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 1618356 Wyświetl załącznik 1618350

The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
They made similar screeches when he responded to questions about military action against North Korea with "we'll see".

Projection is their Rosetta Stone. Hilldawg told Biden to not concede under any circumstances.
 
Grog powiedział(a):
Did anyone even know who that bitch was before she died?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
She was the old, aging Democrat on the Supreme Court who hated Trump and loved Roe v Wade and wouldn't resign in order to spite Trump.

That's really all there was to Ginsburg in the public consciousness even before she died.
 
It's HK-47 powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 1618356 Wyświetl załącznik 1618350

The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Not sure why they didn't expect what they think is a stupid answer to their stupid question. They, for some reason, think Harris' election (what this really is) is all but guaranteed.
 
Iwasamwillbe powiedział(a):
She was the old, aging Democrat on the Supreme Court who hated Trump and loved Roe v Wade and wouldn't resign in order to spite Trump.

That's really all there was to Ginsburg in the public consciousness even before she died.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
As for what legal analysts thought of her, just read what was said about her during her confirmation here (archive). Page 12 has the craziest stuff. She was the loudest voice on the Supreme Court pushing for the gender nonsense we see today, only she started doing it 40 years ago not just recently.
 
Collections Agent powiedział(a):
I'd use that for advertising material for the helmet
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's HK-47 powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 1618356 Wyświetl załącznik 1618350

The "context" that these journalists and Daniel are supplying is, ironically, actually out of context. The video is clipped to where we only hear the question framed as, "Will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election?" To the shock of no one, there was actually significantly more to that question.
​
"Mr. President, real quickly: Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferal of power after the election? And there has been rioting in Louisville. There's been rioting in many cities across this country--red and--your so-called red and blue states. Will you commit to a peaceful transferal of power after the election?"​

Win, lose or draw. If it's a win or a draw, why the fuck would he commit to a transfer of power? Is he going to forcibly transfer power to himself if he wins? Is he going to aggressively transfer the power to Biden and himself if it's a draw? This is a completely fucking retarded question and the only reason that they asked it in the first place was so that they could pry this sound clip out of him.

Fuck journalists.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
That's the go-to "Trump man bad" post I'm seeing all day. How do they interpret an ambiguous answer as "no I will absolutely not concede power peacefully if I lose. In fact I will be a dictator and not leave ever".

Also I was wondering why Trump did not just say "if I lose I'll concede power peacefully". But I'm thinking he CAN'T promise that because while he can control himself he can't control how everyone else will react to it. We've seen how people protest these days. We'll just have to see.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole