US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Borscht
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
DNC: *supports BLM, an organization about how cops are monsters to black people or in general*

also DNC: *picks (because Biden obviously didn't) exact cop that BLM oppose*

Well this is an interesting turn of events.
 
Pretty much this. I believe the NAACP is falling all over themselves to praise Kamala for being black:


It's like actual dark black Americans don't exist; they're grasping at straws basically.


Kamala is 1/2 jamacian (which could be fucking anything) and 1/2 indian (british slave/servant). She's as 'black' as obama was 'black' meaning that 1/2 blood African is OK to be black but 3/4 other+1/4 black is not black enough.

You know who else had ratios like this on how much blood/ancestry is allowed to be considered pure vs unaccepted?

DNC: *supports BLM, an organization about how cops are monsters to black people or in general*

also DNC: *picks (because Biden obviously didn't) exact cop that BLM oppose*

Well this is an interesting turn of events.

If I don't hear BLM/Antifa screeching to Defund the DNC i'll call them all hypocrites (not a stretch I know)
 
Kamala is 1/2 jamacian (which could be fucking anything) and 1/2 indian (british slave/servant). She's as 'black' as obama was 'black' meaning that 1/2 blood African is OK to be black but 3/4 other+1/4 black is not black enough.

On the other hand...


Looks like the NAACP's standards for what counts as black are slipping.
 
That number couldn't have been accomplished without such upstanding sociopaths like Whitmer and Cuomo.

I just hate the bandying about of that number like it's significant, it's just pathetic muckraking and appeal to emotion. Who cares? 164k is a very small number compared to the amount of people still living and continuing to be born every minute of every day.
 
Pretty much this. I believe the NAACP is falling all over themselves to praise Kamala for being black:


It's like actual dark black Americans don't exist; they're grasping at straws basically.

Interesting to note, isn't it?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there have been no dark-skinned people who ran for president in the DNC in the past decade. If there were, they probably were forgettable or ended their campaigns early.

Fucking Herman Cain and Ben Carson were darker than Harris, Obama and Booker.

Also, it's funny that the New York Post calls Obama "black" but de Blasio's son "bi-racial".
 
Warren. Harris sabotages him, Warren could actually start a civil war (at least among the dems) since the berniebros are convinced she got some sort of deal to stay in and spoil Bernie's vote when everyone dropped out and endorsed Biden.

The real reason they didn't pick Warren is because a lot of the donors would bolt.

Harris was establishment pick day one. This is just a ploy to get her into the presidency without ever having to win a single primary.
 
Warren. Harris sabotages him, Warren could actually start a civil war (at least among the dems) since the berniebros are convinced she got some sort of deal to stay in and spoil Bernie's vote when everyone dropped out and endorsed Biden.
Okay that is a fair point, however in the current situation we're in, Kamala is the worst choice for VP unless the memory-holing is going to be strong with the media.
 
164k dead from the Wu Flu? Who fucking cares. If those LOW ENERGY lives mattered at all they'd still be here. SAD!
That’s so me when I fill up all the nursing homes in New York with corona patients.

Definitely a lot of astroturfing going on with Reddit and such, makes me weirdly nostalgic for 2016.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Interesting to note, isn't it?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there have been no dark-skinned people who ran for president in the DNC in the past decade. If there were, they probably were forgettable or ended their campaigns early.

Fucking Herman Cain and Ben Carson were darker than Harris, Obama and Booker.

Also, it's funny that the New York Post calls Obama "black" but de Blasio's son "bi-racial".
But they're Republicans, which means in their eyes they're coons and uncle Tom's.
 
164k dead from the Wu Flu? Who fucking cares. If those LOW ENERGY lives mattered at all they'd still be here. SAD!
Good thing no political party was undergoing a drawn out petty squabble against trump that they knew would go nowhere while he was trying to implement travel restrictions in the early days of the pandemic.
 
I hope the GoP dint get cocky after this.

The Democrats are going to pull every trick, every dirty tactic, every cheat they can to win this election. With mail in ballots looking more and more likely Trump will have to come up with something to combat the "surprisingly large" turn out of "new" democratic votes.
 
You know the worst thing about this VP pick? It's the implications.
For months we've assumed the Dems plan for Biden to die mid term and let the VP be the real president, but what if that's not it. What if the Dems genuinely believe that he's a good choice for president?

It reminds of the fact that you can tell a lot about a political party by it's losers and worst members. Let's do that by looking at the losing presidential candidates of the last few elections (say, since the Reagan era).
Republican losers: George Bush, Bob Dole, Mitt Romney, John McCain. = Old and pretty much out of touch.
Democrat losers: Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton. = delusional and really out of touch.

It's likely that the establishment believes that Trump is so bad an incumbent that their voter base will wholly and unwaveringly buy the "vote blue no matter who" messaging instead of just opting out of voting altogether out of disillusionment.

And to be sure, there's a case to be made about Trump and, say, his handling of COVID and the implications of that on his presidential caliber. But the DNC likely honestly believes that America is hungry for change, any change, even if that change comes in the form of the charisma vacuum known as Biden and the political prostitute known as Harris. They likely believe that the constituency will suck up the reality that Biden's partly responsible for our climbing incarceration rate and the increased dissolution of the African-American household and that Harris actively used lives (and particularly black lives) as pawns for her political advancement-- or they think that they can cast her as a victim of the legal system that she participated in. They likely believe that they can stave away the disillusionment of their activist and Bernie wings by continuing to cast Trump as the Great Satan Volde-Hitler that they absolutely need to get rid of, no matter what-- "he's not perfect, but he's a start".

They could be right, actually. That could be the case.

It's just completely cynical and tasteless.

Their current matchup has much for Trump to exploit, it is impossible for Trump to not exploit those weaknesses, and it's unfathomable that the ensuing voter disillusionment will not be significant.

And if they lose, they can always say that Trump "stole the election".

...of course, Republicans are getting ready to say that the Democrats stole the election.

...this isn't going to be fun. Or perhaps it will be. Perspectives.

Remember, Biden can afford to alienate the black vote because the black vote goes DNC no matter what because of gibs.

The DNC owns the blacks and they know it.

The question isn't about getting the black vote. It's about getting enough black Americans to vote in the first place.

It's why Trump's (and the GOP's strategy, really) primary strategy re: the black voting bloc is to disillusion them, and then attempt to collect whatever few voters they can as a "bonus".
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
James Woods tweeted this one before it was either deleted or pulled down.
6D062969-C6E2-4A17-866B-7F2DC6CBDA46.jpeg
 
The problem IMO with assuming that Harris is a 'bad choice' is assuming that low-information normies will know enough about her checkered past- which is questionable. At a skin-deep glance, she fills all the DNC categories, and is uniquely suited to target swing states, women, and suburbs- aka the purplish regions.

I fully expect an intensification of the already ongoing media-driven glow-up to further transform her into the candidate of the moderate suburban soccer moms, and the nullification of her past by obfuscation and full-scale 1984-esque revisionism.

As such, my gut feeling is that any sort of counter-narrative will be from Trump's ads, Fox News, and the VP debates. The internet will be a complete wasteland unless you know where to look.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole