🐮 Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[A Cardboard Box]

Actually they do. It falls under property rights




I've been cited by other scholars, and NO, I'm not telling you who, I'm not setting them up to be victimized by you.

You can talk shit about my writings all you want, you can produce no evidence against them


At least jewsforjudaism.org presents hard questions with facts. You're just clucking roosters and hens




50% Ashkenazi to be exact






Marshall has never once tried to leave me. Even if I would be in a position to have to beg someone to return, I wouldn't be too proud to do it.

I happen to like Hispanic music. It is full of passion and lovers pleading for each other. It takes humility to tell someone you need them ("te necesito"), that your heart beats for them ("latiendo por to", that your heart aches for them ("te duele el corazon para ti"). All sorts of expressions that English love songs lack.
Proud Anglos think that being a desperate lover is a weakness, eh?

By covenant with him changed because of some personality conflicts we have. It's just a better fit.







You try to Christianize The Messiah by inventing theology and then trying to get his words to fit

Instead, you should start at the beginning, which is The Torah, and understanding The JEWISH Messiah in context of The Torah

You do realize that The Messiah was a Torah observant Jewish man, right?

"Those who claim to be in him must walk as he walked" (1 John 2:6)

Okay but like he literally said the things you disagree with. It's in the Gospel. He LITERALLY said the things.

 

[Spergichu]

Actually they do. It falls under property rights




I've been cited by other scholars, and NO, I'm not telling you who, I'm not setting them up to be victimized by you.

You can talk shit about my writings all you want, you can produce no evidence against them


At least jewsforjudaism.org presents hard questions with facts. You're just clucking roosters and hens

How many times do we have to tell you what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence?

You try to Christianize The Messiah by inventing theology and then trying to get his words to fit

Instead, you should start at the beginning, which is The Torah, and understanding The JEWISH Messiah in context of The Torah

You do realize that The Messiah was a Torah observant Jewish man, right?

"Those who claim to be in him must walk as he walked" (1 John 2:6)

But there are passages that have been posted here spoken directly by Jesus or whatever you want to call him which directly contradict what you've been saying. Why do you keep ignoring these passages?

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Marshall has never once tried to leave me.

So he just disappeared and refused to answer your phone calls, to the point where you came here, to kiwi farms, to publicly blast him.

Actually Marshall had doubts about Paul before we met. After he read my paper, he came over to the other side fully and rejected Paul's lies

Yes, Marshall really strikes me as a scholar, deeply enmeshed in in the subtleties of Pauline teachings and archaic Jewish law. Be serious, Melinda. Marshall's a retard and so are you for subjecting your children to his presence. Of all your fantasies, this fiction where Marshall is a smart guy is perhaps your most baffling.

Also, do you have to call him Master Marshall now?

 

[White Baby]

Instead, you should start at the beginning, which is The Torah, and understanding The JEWISH Messiah in context of The Torah

I have quoted torah passages at you more than once and suddenly now that I've given you evidence that the self-same Jewish Messiah says you must forgive your fellow man suddenly you can't fucking read? He says it. It's right there. I picked only the words from His mouth just for you. I could probably even track down the original manuscript pre translation if you want to pretend like you understand ancient Hebrew some more.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

So he just disappeared and refused to answer your phone calls, to the point where you came here, to kiwi farms, to publicly blast him.




Yes, Marshall really strikes me as a scholar, deeply enmeshed in in the subtleties of Pauline teachings and archaic Jewish law. Be serious, Melinda. Marshall's a retard and so are you for subjecting your children to his presence. Of all your fantasies, this fiction where Marshall is a smart guy is perhaps your most baffling.

Also, do you have to call him Master Marshall now?

Listen you just don't understand the intricacies of ancient Hebrew covenants. They aren't about love, or respect, or bodily autonomy, or children, they're about a couple that bond with God but not necessarily each other all the time. It's about things like spousal rape, mistrust, spying, assault and battery with a deadly weapon, child neglect, and outside recreation.

 

[LoverofPi]

I've been cited by other scholars, and NO, I'm not telling you who, I'm not setting them up to be victimized by you.

Pull the other one, it's got bells on. We all know your papers are entirely pointless.

You can talk shit about my writings all you want, you can produce no evidence against them

She says, ignoring that we've been producing simple quotations to refute her nonsense for the past few pages.

At least jewsforjudaism.org presents hard questions with facts. You're just clucking roosters and hens

And you're just a barn door without a barn.
Now that we've gotten our entires for the nonsensical farm related insult competition out of the way, back to business!

50% Ashkenazi to be exact

Strongly doubt.

Marshall has never once tried to leave me. Even if I would be in a position to have to beg someone to return, I wouldn't be too proud to do it.

You know what, I do believe that you wouldn't be too proud to beg, in the moment. But I do think you'd be too proud to admit it afterwards.

You try to Christianize The Messiah by inventing theology and then trying to get his words to fit

You don't need to twist "turn the other cheek" "forgive your brother" "forgive others of their sins against you and YHWH will more readily forgive your own" or "love your enemies" into anything. I'm just taking them at face value.

Instead, you should start at the beginning, which is The Torah, and understanding The JEWISH Messiah in context of The Torah

You do realize that The Messiah was a Torah observant Jewish man, right?

"Those who claim to be in him must walk as he walked" (1 John 2:6)

Ah,. John 2.

Don't forget 2:3-5
We know that we have come to know him if we keep his commands. Whoever says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in that person. But if anyone obeys his word, love for God[a] is truly made complete in them. This is how we know we are in him:

Or 2:9-11
Anyone who claims to be in the light but hates a brother or sister is still in the darkness. Anyone who loves their brother and sister lives in the light, and there is nothing in them to make them stumble. But anyone who hates a brother or sister is in the darkness and walks around in the darkness. They do not know where they are going, because the darkness has blinded them.

And Jesus said, plain as day, "forgive." Also "love." He said it a lot, really.

I have quoted torah passages at you more than once and suddenly now that I've given you evidence that the self-same Jewish Messiah says you must forgive your fellow man suddenly you can't fucking read?

Sudden onset illiteracy is a serious problem among the religiously entitled. Why, any time their words could be turned around against them they suddenly lack all ability to read or comprehend words. It would be tragic if the people it afflicted weren't such shitpiles.

He says it. It's right there. I picked only the words from His mouth just for you. I could probably even track down the original manuscript pre translation if you want to pretend like you understand ancient Hebrew some more.

Oh, she would claim she reads it, then make stuff up and claim secret knowledge. Protecting that ego is priority number one. It's why she refuses to elaborate on scientific matters after shooting her mouth off, why she refuses to comment on the shape of the earth, that sort of thing.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

She says, ignoring that we've been producing simple quotations to refute her nonsense for the past few pages.

Simple quotations slapped on a comment is not proper exegesis.

You can say The Messiah said something and post a verse but if you can't draw it back to The Torah you are just creating a false Messiah

we keep his commands

You condemn yourself with your own words, being that "his commands" is The Torah!

hates a brother or sister

Keyword: brother and sister

"and who are my mother brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father"

The will of The Father is that His Sheep obey The Torah

Listen you just don't understand the intricacies of ancient Hebrew covenants. They aren't about love, or respect, or bodily autonomy, or children, they're about a couple that bond with God but not necessarily each other all the time. It's about things like spousal rape, mistrust, spying, assault and battery with a deadly weapon, child neglect, and outside recreation.

Wrong. There's no textual evidence to support that theory and likewise, there is plenty of textual evidence to disprove the other half of what you said

Take your word "love" for example. Now go back and read Genesis 27:64 that I posted a few days back

I have quoted torah passages at you more than once and suddenly now that I've given you evidence that the self-same Jewish Messiah says you must forgive your fellow man suddenly you can't fucking read? He says it. It's right there. I picked only the words from His mouth just for you. I could probably even track down the original manuscript pre translation if you want to pretend like you understand ancient Hebrew some more.

Maybe your comment didn't post? Where did you post verses from The Torah?

So he just disappeared and refused to answer your phone calls, to the point where you came here, to kiwi farms, to publicly blast him.

Didn't disappear.

He just doesn't respond to texts very well. That's why he's Master, not husband.
No further comment.

Yes, Marshall really strikes me as a scholar, deeply enmeshed in in the subtleties of Pauline teachings and archaic Jewish law. Be serious, Melinda. Marshall's a retard and so are you for subjecting your children to his presence. Of all your fantasies, this fiction where Marshall is a smart guy is perhaps your most baffling.

Also, do you have to call him Master Marshall now?

I do call him "Master", in English, at times, almost in a spiteful tone when I'm really mad. I also call him אֲדֹנָי in Hebrew. If I remember correctly, it's the same word Sarah called Abraham.

I don't think it conflicts with my gender equality principles because I'm not calling him that just because he is a man. It's just our Covenant arrangement. I'm not able to feel love when a guy exhibits certain qualities. He also can't handle emotional intimacy with a woman very well. So we found a better arrangement.

How many times do we have to tell you what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence?



But there are passages that have been posted here spoken directly by Jesus or whatever you want to call him which directly contradict what you've been saying. Why do you keep ignoring these passages?

I'm not ignoring them. What I'm saying is that you are taking them out of their context: The Torah

Genesis 27:64

*Gen. 24:67

 

[Deadpool]

Simple quotations slapped on a comment is not proper exegesis.

You can say The Messiah said something and post a verse but if you can't draw it back to The Torah you are just creating a false Messiah





You condemn yourself with your own words, being that "his commands" is The Torah!





Keyword: brother and sister

"and who are my mother brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father"

The will of The Father is that His Sheep obey The Torah



Wrong. There's no textual evidence to support that theory and likewise, there is plenty of textual evidence to disprove the other half of what you said

Take your word "love" for example. Now go back and read Genesis 27:64 that I posted a few days back




Maybe your comment didn't post? Where did you post verses from The Torah?









Didn't disappear.

He just doesn't respond to texts very well. That's why he's Master, not husband.
No further comment.






I do call him "Master", in English, at times, almost in a spiteful tone when I'm really mad. I also call him אֲדֹנָי in Hebrew. If I remember correctly, it's the same word Sarah called Abraham.

I don't think it conflicts with my gender equality principles because I'm not calling him that just because he is a man. It's just our Covenant arrangement. I'm not able to feel love when a guy exhibits certain qualities. He also can't handle emotional intimacy with a woman very well. So we found a better arrangement.



I'm not ignoring them. What I'm saying is that you are taking them out of their context: The Torah

Which one of your children do you think is most likely to grow up to be a serial killer? I'd say probably not the one who's too stupid to flip the bird. I don't think he's smart enough to kill someone. He'd probably end up killing himself on accident. Which one do you think will follow in @Marshall Castersen's example and become a methed up lot lizard?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Sudden onset illiteracy is a serious problem among the religiously entitled. Why, any time their words could be turned around against them they suddenly lack all ability to read or comprehend words. It would be tragic if the people it afflicted weren't such shitpiles.

This is why Buddha said not trust Texts as much, like words they can lie to you, or the writer may write about things that they haven't experienced themselves.

In the words of Richard Dawkings people believe in a god such as this.


"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."

Of course religious people would forget how to "read" when confronted with the very same words they themselves believe in.

 

[Melinda's Retarded Piglet]

This is why Buddha said not trust Texts as much, like words they can lie to you, or the writer may write about things that they haven't experienced themselves.

In the words of Richard Dawkings people believe in a god such as this.


"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."

Of course religious people would forget how to "read" when confronted with the very same words they themselves believe in.

Elohim is apeecea fuckin sheeyit. I doan cayur whut mah mommah thanks. Marshy's cockpiece is taystee like ahs creeum. They mayk mee lah to the social ladee. Please tayk me away an put me in a deecunt Christshun househowld.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Simple quotations slapped on a comment is not proper exegesis.

You can say The Messiah said something and post a verse but if you can't draw it back to The Torah you are just creating a false Messiah





You condemn yourself with your own words, being that "his commands" is The Torah!





Keyword: brother and sister

"and who are my mother brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father"

The will of The Father is that His Sheep obey The Torah



Wrong. There's no textual evidence to support that theory and likewise, there is plenty of textual evidence to disprove the other half of what you said

Take your word "love" for example. Now go back and read Genesis 27:64 that I posted a few days back




Maybe your comment didn't post? Where did you post verses from The Torah?









Didn't disappear.

He just doesn't respond to texts very well. That's why he's Master, not husband.
No further comment.






I do call him "Master", in English, at times, almost in a spiteful tone when I'm really mad. I also call him אֲדֹנָי in Hebrew. If I remember correctly, it's the same word Sarah called Abraham.

I don't think it conflicts with my gender equality principles because I'm not calling him that just because he is a man. It's just our Covenant arrangement. I'm not able to feel love when a guy exhibits certain qualities. He also can't handle emotional intimacy with a woman very well. So we found a better arrangement.



I'm not ignoring them. What I'm saying is that you are taking them out of their context: The Torah

How many times did you fall down the stairs unattended as a kid, legitimate question

 

[Toasty]

You can say The Messiah said something and post a verse but if you can't draw it back to The Torah you are just creating a false Messiah

Do your own homework.

 

[White Baby]

You can say The Messiah said something and post a verse but if you can't draw it back to The Torah you are just creating a false Messiah

You heard it here first, folks: literally quoting her alleged Messiah at her in a way she doesn't like means that you're "creating a false Messiah". Never mind that every single Netzarim or Messianic group accepts all the books I quoted as fact and truth, regardless of their thoughts on Paul or Enoch or any of those wild dudes: I'm using Yeshua to condemn Melinda, therefore my direct quotes from him are simply false.

This is why we tell you over and over that you're a narcissistic schizoid, Linda. Do you think you could walk into any Netzarim congregation on the face of this earth and pull that shit and not get laughed and/or chased out?

Maybe your comment didn't post? Where did you post verses from The Torah?

Look up my post history. I've done enough of your footwork for one day.

He just doesn't respond to texts very well. That's why he's Master, not husband.
No further comment

Did you decide that you loved him again?

He also can't handle emotional intimacy with a woman very well. So we found a better arrangement.

Yeah, that sounds like an awesome model for your kids to witness as they grow up. I bet your sons will learn all sorts of lessons about emotional intimacy from their abusive father. You are perpetuating the cycle of abuse and you really don't give a shit, do you?

 

[Toasty]

You heard it here first, folks: literally quoting her alleged Messiah at her in a way she doesn't like means that you're "creating a false Messiah". Never mind that every single Netzarim or Messianic group accepts all the books I quoted as fact and truth, regardless of their thoughts on Paul or Enoch or any of those wild dudes: I'm using Yeshua to condemn Melinda, therefore my direct quotes from him are simply false.

This is why we tell you over and over that you're a narcissistic schizoid, Linda. Do you think you could walk into any Netzarim congregation on the face of this earth and pull that shit and not get laughed and/or chased out?



Look up my post history. I've done enough of your footwork for one day.



Did you decide that you loved him again?


Yeah, that sounds like an awesome model for your kids to witness as they grow up. I bet your sons will learn all sorts of lessons about emotional intimacy from their abusive father. You are perpetuating the cycle of abuse and you really don't give a shit, do you?

She doesn't give a shit about perpetuating the cycle of poverty, why should she give a shit about modeling healthy relationship dynamics?

 

[LoverofPi]

Simple quotations slapped on a comment is not proper exegesis.

Doesn't need to be. The quotes are simple instructions. That you reject them so utterly just says you are not interested in anything Jesus the teacher had to say and are only interested in what Jesus the Messiah can do for you.

You can say The Messiah said something and post a verse but if you can't draw it back to The Torah you are just creating a false Messiah

Or put another way, because you don't like what the plain text is saying, you reject it as heresy and need to turn it on its head. I mean, there's special pleading, but this is just "He didn't mean what he actually said, he meant the opposite, yeah, that's the ticket!"

You condemn yourself with your own words, being that "his commands" is The Torah!

Which is a bit like saying "That's not a tree, this is a forest!" since you absolutely refuse to recognize the commands that comprise the whole work

Keyword: brother and sister

"and who are my mother brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father"

The will of The Father is that His Sheep obey The Torah

And part of obeying the Torah under Yeshua bin Joseph is to love thy enemies, to turn the other cheek, to forgive others of their sins that your sins might also be forgiven.
You're trying to catch me up with pedantry, and believe you me, Mel, if it's a battle of pedantry you want, I am prepared to fight that battle.

Wrong. There's no textual evidence to support that theory and likewise, there is plenty of textual evidence to disprove the other half of what you said

Take your word "love" for example. Now go back and read Genesis 27:64 that I posted a few days back

I'm not sure if I should spoil this hilarious moment or not. @A Cardboard Box do you want to explain your post or just leave it as another sign of Mel not understanding things?

Didn't disappear.

He just doesn't respond to texts very well. That's why he's Master, not husband.
No further comment.

The absolute shift in typing style, the change in demeanor. Amazingly telling.

I do call him "Master", in English, at times, almost in a spiteful tone when I'm really mad. I also call him אֲדֹנָי in Hebrew. If I remember correctly, it's the same word Sarah called Abraham.

I don't think it conflicts with my gender equality principles because I'm not calling him that just because he is a man. It's just our Covenant arrangement. I'm not able to feel love when a guy exhibits certain qualities. He also can't handle emotional intimacy with a woman very well. So we found a better arrangement.

So you can't love him and he can't be emotionally intimate with you. Sounds like a shitty relationship all told.

I'm not ignoring them. What I'm saying is that you are taking them out of their context: The Torah

You mean your specific interpretation of the Torah. Because you are not on the same page with like... anyone else.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

I'm not sure if I should spoil this hilarious moment or not. @A Cardboard Box do you want to explain your post or just leave it as another sign of Mel not understanding things?

Just leave it. Her impotent rage of feeling like a retard that missed the obvious is like the icing on the cake that is the joke.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Lol, Marshall doesn't love you, Melinda, and he certainly doesn't love your children. You're an easy victim, not a fully-realized person worth loving. There's literally nothing about you that's lovable.

 

[Thornforg]

Yeah, based on Melinda's description of Marshall's behavior, it seems obvious, but unless Marshall has actual offenses against children (I don't follow thread enough to know if that was proven), then in most states, it would be hard to prove "dangerous to children" even if they commit violent assaults against adults.

Well, he MIGHT HAVE, maybe, kinda sorta murdered one of his own piglets.

EDIT: Still catching up on the thread, but if the mountain jews have split, do they get to share custody of the thread, or does Marshal get his own?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Well, he MIGHT HAVE, maybe, kinda sorta murdered one of his own piglets.

EDIT: Still catching up on the thread, but if the mountain jews have split, do they get to share custody of the thread, or does Marshal get his own?

Eh, Marshall is a dumb fucking cow, but he's also too pussy and too inactive to have a worthwhile thread imo

 

[Toasty]

He occasionally makes unintentionally hilarious videos, while she constantly makes unintentionally hilarious posts, from early in the morning until late into the evening. He at least appears to occasionally do some unskilled labor, making him marginally less of a complete loser than she is.