ditto
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 17 Sie 2019
Also the audio is really muffled.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Twórca wątku Randall Fragg
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Dołączono
- 3 Gru 2013
Wanna see how CNN is reporting it?
- Dołączono
- 6 Maj 2019
Hillary losing was the death knell to soooo many plans.
- Flooding illegal immigrants in to ensure constant control? Dead. (Proof of this, see California still desperately clinging to The Plan)
- Rejiggering the entire Justice Department and both the FBI and CIA to be permenent democrat controlled arms? Barr is quitely going Scorched Earth. ( https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-deck-against-trump-at-the-justice-department )
- Literally EVERYTHING the Democrats are trying to push through as "Emergency Spending" in the repeatedly attempted bullshit bills in the House.
- Dołączono
- 14 Wrz 2019
I have a theory that threads all of these but it's kooky as shit.
- Dołączono
- 12 Sty 2019
Kushner is singlehandedly importing more people than Obama did, even during the middle of a pandemic, and he's not even the President. Good luck getting Trump to cut out his son in law.
- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
Something fucky is going on at predictit. Weird numbers for things like “Pence as VP”.
- Dołączono
- 28 Lut 2019
Oh? Do tell.
- Dołączono
- 6 Sty 2019
babadook
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 25 Gru 2019
Jesus christ the state of news organizations
- Dołączono
- 4 Lis 2017
The Obama freak out is starting to make sense.
- Dołączono
- 24 Mar 2019
Remember the leaked phone call a few days ago where Obama said Flynn was being tried for perjury when he wasn't at the time?
Flynn is, as of yesterday, being tried for perjury by the judge, who has appointed a guy who wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post that the DOJ shouldn't get to drop its own case.
It's a hilarious coincidence.
- Dołączono
- 4 Lis 2017
Giving maximum latitude:
The DoT might be involved in investigations about tracking funds from Russian sources
The Ambassador to Italy would need to be advised about any Russian intelligence operations that would involve Italy.
It is possible that they'd have legitmate need to be aware of the call and contents. But as Ryan Paul points out, this could have/should have been handled by a transcript. As it sits it looks more like calling a bunch of people down to listen and ask "does that sound like General Flynn to you?"
- Dołączono
- 24 Mar 2019
Now do the one where the Dems will try to justify Samantha Powers, Ambassador to the UN, asking seven times. It's great stuff.
wopirish
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 19 Sty 2020
Its impressive just how much power appointed judges and others who are on committees/subcommittees that are jobs for life can wield. Especially given that many of those are activist judges.
In example is Chesa Boudin
Chesa is the child of a terrorist who is now the DA of San Francisco who is taking a diferrent approach to crime. When he first got into office he cleaned house of anyone experience who didn't share his politics. He is also noteworthy for refusal to prosecute certain crimes as-well as dropping cases against offenders when there is video evidence of the attack.
Notedly, this is an obviously biased source but you can skim some facts about him.
www.history.com
In example is Chesa Boudin
Chesa is the child of a terrorist who is now the DA of San Francisco who is taking a diferrent approach to crime. When he first got into office he cleaned house of anyone experience who didn't share his politics. He is also noteworthy for refusal to prosecute certain crimes as-well as dropping cases against offenders when there is video evidence of the attack.
Notedly, this is an obviously biased source but you can skim some facts about him.
From Terrorist’s Son to Peace Activist
How Zak Ebrahim struggled—and succeeded—to break away from a culture of hate.
www.history.com
- Dołączono
- 1 Kwi 2017
It's 2020.
You know the rule of the current timeline: The more unlikely it is for something to happen or to be exposed as having happened, the more likely it is that the unlikely thing will turn out to be reality.
I call it: The Inverse Possibility of Reality.
Garm
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 5 Cze 2019
I would agree with this except I'm dealing with a Federal Nature Reserve that was shelved during the Clinton Administration (~1999) only to be established through backdoor means in the closing days of the Obama Administration. (May 2016.)
Whatever plans they have will not be stopped unless the system is dismantled.
- Dołączono
- 14 Wrz 2019
Truly tinfoil hat stuff here. I'm guardedly certain about motivations and connections, by no means zealously positive.
Anyways.
I'm *generally* on board with Barr. I have a lot of respect for him. I think he's a morals over money kind of guy. I'm not saying he's 100% procedurally clean (I don't think he is), and he views the POTUS position a bit more of a monarch role than I would like, but I think it's very safe to say he hates pedophiliac operations with a passion.
My evidence for this is strictly circumstantial and mostly confined to more recent happenings.
Take Jefferey Epstein. The guy had been coming and going for over a decade after his sex offender status. The impetus for reopening the case was actually congressman Ben Sasse causing a ruckus. However, Bill Barr was 2 weeks or less from his confirmation as Attorney General for the second time. I find it really hard to believe an incoming nominee (who has already held the position) wouldn't have been at least generally informed about such a huge case.
Consider that since Feburary 2019 there has been 1236 child abuse convictions, a 5% increase from 1177 convictions in about the same preceeding time period. That's consistent with his previous handlings as AG, where he moved more manpower from counterintelligence. (Yes, I get gang violence isn't child abuse per se) (also, really dirty number crunching, sorry.) Source
I think it's important that Barr's operations go after the users and not just the site owners. Notable differences here:
There's also the fact that Barr himself was CIA for 6 years in the 70s; he was lowlevel, sure, but who know what he came across. He probably understands the glowies.
My evidence for this is strictly circumstantial and mostly confined to more recent happenings.
Take Jefferey Epstein. The guy had been coming and going for over a decade after his sex offender status. The impetus for reopening the case was actually congressman Ben Sasse causing a ruckus. However, Bill Barr was 2 weeks or less from his confirmation as Attorney General for the second time. I find it really hard to believe an incoming nominee (who has already held the position) wouldn't have been at least generally informed about such a huge case.
Consider that since Feburary 2019 there has been 1236 child abuse convictions, a 5% increase from 1177 convictions in about the same preceeding time period. That's consistent with his previous handlings as AG, where he moved more manpower from counterintelligence. (Yes, I get gang violence isn't child abuse per se) (also, really dirty number crunching, sorry.) Source
I think it's important that Barr's operations go after the users and not just the site owners. Notable differences here:
There's also the fact that Barr himself was CIA for 6 years in the 70s; he was lowlevel, sure, but who know what he came across. He probably understands the glowies.
Here's where the tinfoil starts to apply.
I think Barr knows of the existence of the Finders as a predatory cult that's (allegedly) funded by the CIA. Back in October 2019 the FBI dropped the first of (currently) 3 declassified compilations of records. The FBI, the CIA, Customs, and Interpol and who knows who else are all involved with this group that's based out of DC and came to national spotlight in 1987. No really, facts of agency involvement are coming from the FBI files. KF even has a thread on the Finders.
Ted Gunderson (deceased former FBI chief) was one of the most outspoken about the Finders and claimed to have personally written to William Barr during while Barr was the AG. I don't doubt he sent the letter. Here's the letter to Barr that I got in a dump of other Finders files but I don't know the source and can't verify it. I believe it's from a FOIA request.
The thing is, I don't believe everything Ted says. He goes on and on about symbolism (in one case saying the stars on the GOP elephant "inverting" means they turned Satanic) so I think he was a bit off his rocker, or perhaps just too used to looking for hidden meanings in mundane things.
Let's loop this back into Barr. The Finder's vault files so far released primarily deal with incidents in the 80's and 93/94, but there are multiple documents sprinkled through Barr's term as AG. He was ousted in early 1993 as part of the change of administration from Bush senior to Clinton. Barr may or may not have actually got the letter from Gunderson but! in 1993 there was a tv station that wanted to do a Finders special. Multiple members of Congress got involved. Given those two facts I think it likely that the AG was apprised of the situation. I don't have any proof of that, mind you.
I think Barr knows of the existence of the Finders as a predatory cult that's (allegedly) funded by the CIA. Back in October 2019 the FBI dropped the first of (currently) 3 declassified compilations of records. The FBI, the CIA, Customs, and Interpol and who knows who else are all involved with this group that's based out of DC and came to national spotlight in 1987. No really, facts of agency involvement are coming from the FBI files. KF even has a thread on the Finders.
Ted Gunderson (deceased former FBI chief) was one of the most outspoken about the Finders and claimed to have personally written to William Barr during while Barr was the AG. I don't doubt he sent the letter. Here's the letter to Barr that I got in a dump of other Finders files but I don't know the source and can't verify it. I believe it's from a FOIA request.
The thing is, I don't believe everything Ted says. He goes on and on about symbolism (in one case saying the stars on the GOP elephant "inverting" means they turned Satanic) so I think he was a bit off his rocker, or perhaps just too used to looking for hidden meanings in mundane things.
Let's loop this back into Barr. The Finder's vault files so far released primarily deal with incidents in the 80's and 93/94, but there are multiple documents sprinkled through Barr's term as AG. He was ousted in early 1993 as part of the change of administration from Bush senior to Clinton. Barr may or may not have actually got the letter from Gunderson but! in 1993 there was a tv station that wanted to do a Finders special. Multiple members of Congress got involved. Given those two facts I think it likely that the AG was apprised of the situation. I don't have any proof of that, mind you.
Finally, let's look at HRC.
She was a low level intern on the counsel of the prosecution of Nixon during his impeachment. Coincidentally this is the exact timeframe when MKUltra messed up and would later come to light because some 20k of the files intended to be panic-purged were misfiled into some other random place. I don't think she was involved in MKUltra in any way, just an interesting connection.
Everyone under the sun has heard about Bill Clinton's logged flights on the Lolita Express, as well as the suiciding memes, the private server, Benghazi, etc.
Instead of rehashing that I'm just going to
A) remind you that Clinton reportedly had a tantrum of fear after the 2016 election and
B) provide you two short clips, one of "We've Read the Documents" linking part of an interview to the Finders #2 vault drop, and one MSNBC news clip that aired shortly after the Benghazi congressional inquiries. (I don't know the date, sorry.)
She was a low level intern on the counsel of the prosecution of Nixon during his impeachment. Coincidentally this is the exact timeframe when MKUltra messed up and would later come to light because some 20k of the files intended to be panic-purged were misfiled into some other random place. I don't think she was involved in MKUltra in any way, just an interesting connection.
Everyone under the sun has heard about Bill Clinton's logged flights on the Lolita Express, as well as the suiciding memes, the private server, Benghazi, etc.
Instead of rehashing that I'm just going to
A) remind you that Clinton reportedly had a tantrum of fear after the 2016 election and
B) provide you two short clips, one of "We've Read the Documents" linking part of an interview to the Finders #2 vault drop, and one MSNBC news clip that aired shortly after the Benghazi congressional inquiries. (I don't know the date, sorry.)
(There are a few seconds of quiet in the middle, it's not your speakers.)
With every last retarded detail in mind, the reason Flynn is the target is because he isn't compromised and wouldn't back down from the CIA audit. In this kooky fucking theory Flynn's prosecution honestly is not about Trump or Barr or even Flynn himself. It's about protecting a trail of pedophiliac activities that implicate many people.
Are there holes in this theory? Yes. I make multiple assumptions.
Am I biased? Yes. In particular, I may have laid what I want to happen onto Barr's motivations without justifiable cause.
Is the theory wackadoodle? Yes. (What? You were expecting an argument?)
That said, I think it's a fairly solid connection of disparate threads in light of everything uncovered in the last week.
Are there holes in this theory? Yes. I make multiple assumptions.
Am I biased? Yes. In particular, I may have laid what I want to happen onto Barr's motivations without justifiable cause.
Is the theory wackadoodle? Yes. (What? You were expecting an argument?)
That said, I think it's a fairly solid connection of disparate threads in light of everything uncovered in the last week.
Ostatnio edytowane:
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 2 Kwi 2018
And speaking of the judge in question, there's a good rant about him. https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...d_be_recused_from_the_general_flynn_case.html
Judge Sullivan should be recused from the General Flynn case - Americ…
archived 14 May 2020 11:37:38 UTC
- Dołączono
- 3 Gru 2013
I’ve never seen a judge try to argue that because the court forced a man to say he was guilty when he wasn’t, that makes him guilty of perjury.
That’s...that’s a new one.
That’s...that’s a new one.