Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

A decades old scandal that caused another POTUS to resign PLUS all the reeeees over Orange Man Bad are barely 3% of a hashtag that's existed for under 2 days. I feel like the sane folks don't win a whole lot on social media but this feels like a win even if it's just puffs of digital smoke.

Gotta say, this could be a glorious aneurysm-filled day.
Wyświetl załącznik 1286106

That TrumpeGate hashtag is so fucking pathetic. The left needs another weapon apart from screaming "NO U!"
 
o.O GOP Elephant with the Hammer and Sickle.

Just fucking hell I need a drink.
Every time I checked the Obamagate tag it's full of nobodies being in "shock and awe" that the tag is even trending and proceed to spin it as yet another "oRaNgEmAnBAD!1!1!" tweet. (and of course kpop fags spamming videos of their dancing chink monkeys) Failing to realize using the tag in question, they're contributing to its total number so it remains trending into the next day. Twitter is the undefeated champion at playing themselves. 🚬

Of all the tds posters, k-pop pop stars dancing along with a smug caption is by far the most irritating. It’s like the left is trying to be as much of a nuisance and annoyance as as they possibly can.
 
Obamagate now down to 1.32m tweets, plus it's connected to a vox article about q-anon.
1589221403840.png


Looks like a publisher from here.

EDIT: LOL
1589223352055.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The TDS has gotten to The Drudge Report so badly that I've gotta find a new homepage. He was for Trump even if just for the trolling aspect, but then in the past two years it's turned more into the normal TDS, and there's been rumors he's sold the website and that's why it's turning more into a Huffington Post of left wing bitching and panic. Corona Chan has just increased the sensationalism and 50% of the stuff also comes from UK tabloid sensationalism. I don't believe the recent Flynn stuff even got the headline, it was placed in the columns below like an afterthought.

I've heard whatfinger.com is good for a quick aggregate site. It's just sad to finally change the homepage after almost a decade.
Rumor is that Drudge sold his website to a Chosen Person and NDAs were signed. Other people have different opinions.

 
I still think it's amazing how hard the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King Jr.'s advocating to "judge not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character" has been torpedoed to ashes at this point because history's not going to see Obama as anything other than just the first black man to become the U.S. President, and literally, that is always the first thing people point out, proving this was always a race issue that they politicized to hell and back. Outside of watching shows and movies and reading comic books that came out during his presidency to even remember he was president, they can't really look back at his legacy because he doesn't have one now, unless they want to get into the social issues going on under him at the time, but what current year history book is going to delve into that? He can barely even be called the "sitting duck" president like with Herbert Hoover (of which it wasn't his fault), although I remember him being called one during his second term.

I don't think people want to admit to this at all, but I'm thinking the "shattering of the glass ceiling" or whatever it goes for minorities to be the leader of the free world as a testament of how far we've come has been pushed back a good generation or two. As long as race continues to be made an issue, there's a chance we'll never see another black president, let alone a woman, in our lifetime (or at least not until we have more old, grumpy Kiwis), or until everyone suddenly goes blind and therefore can't judge by the color of one's skin anymore. Probably have a better chance of a Hispanic or Asian (but they're white now) to become President than we do another black President.

Thanks, Obama.
Don't you know, that was just one step in shifting society along the spectrum from "Fuck nigs" to "Fuck whitey". That line of thought had its use at one time, but now that the ground is gained it is nothing more than a historical footnote. Anyone who seriously cites it now is trying to undo 60 years of progress, and potentially more if they are smart enough to understand that history is an eternal power struggle between various demographics and are willing to press the attack when the defences are down, like we did.
 
"So what if our guy literally raped you, vote for him"

Is this that rape culture thing I heard so much talk about a few years ago? I heard that was bad.
 
3D951627-DD37-426B-9218-174B6F555A4F.jpeg

Not sure if this was already posted or not but this is too :lunacy: to not have on here
TDS combined with Stockholm syndrome towards opposition??? :thinking:

Are you sure you this isn't bait?? Anyone with such thoughts like these either need extra doses of crazy meds, the psych ward or a lobotomy. Very disturbing.
 
It's been brought up time and time again how Twitter only stays up as a platform because of Trump, and I'm believing it now. Twitter's been perpetually on fire, but the only structure keeping it up is the hateboner for the current President, but they can't ban his account, and they know they can't ban it without severe backlash. Meanwhile, Google and other tech companies and social media were caught like just a couple years ago showing their bias in censoring "wrongthink", and they tried to backpedal on it, but the mask always slips and they fall back into their old habits, one way or another.

Twitter should just give up their bullshit and lie back and take it for another four years, because after Trump leaves, they're done for. And I think they know they're done for, and this is their death throes (or it has just gotten more violent). The harder they struggle, the less peaceful and dignified it becomes for them, and the more harm and unneeded attention they bring upon themselves. This is probably a "taking you with me" last-ditch effort to burn it all to the ground, and we're not even at our October surprise yet.

God, and I thought we don't start seeing the start of the new decade (trends especially) until a year or two into the new decade. Is this truly the year the 2010s bullshit ends and the new "We're Not Gonna Take It" pushback begins?
 
It's been brought up time and time again how Twitter only stays up as a platform because of Trump, and I'm believing it now. Twitter's been perpetually on fire, but the only structure keeping it up is the hateboner for the current President, but they can't ban his account, and they know they can't ban it without severe backlash. Meanwhile, Google and other tech companies and social media were caught like just a couple years ago showing their bias in censoring "wrongthink", and they tried to backpedal on it, but the mask always slips and they fall back into their old habits, one way or another.

Twitter should just give up their bullshit and lie back and take it for another four years, because after Trump leaves, they're done for. And I think they know they're done for, and this is their death throes (or it has just gotten more violent). The harder they struggle, the less peaceful and dignified it becomes for them, and the more harm and unneeded attention they bring upon themselves. This is probably a "taking you with me" last-ditch effort to burn it all to the ground, and we're not even at our October surprise yet.

God, and I thought we don't start seeing the start of the new decade (trends especially) until a year or two into the new decade. Is this truly the year the 2010s bullshit ends and the new "We're Not Gonna Take It" pushback begins?

I literally cannot wait until Twatter goes under. It's overwhelmingly the most cancerous part of the internet and has single handedly done enormous damage to public discourse.
 
I literally cannot wait until Twatter goes under. It's overwhelmingly the most cancerous part of the internet and has single handedly done enormous damage to public discourse.
What the internet needs is a website with the brand recognition of places like YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, etc., but with the hands-off approach to free speech like Kiwi Farms. The more you try to silence people for having an opinion on something, the more your site becomes intellectually inbred like ResetERA or r/incels. An open platform encourages competition of ideas, so the ideas that would be most successful would be the best ideas.

Survival of the fittest isn't just for wild animals.
 
What a surprise, the Dems are at it again.


House Democrats are pushing ahead with a far-reaching Covid-19 recovery package, setting up a clash with the Trump administration and Senate Republican leaders who have so far resisted adding more stimulus to the economy after Washington injected a staggering $3 trillion in recovery programs just this spring alone.

a close up of a man wearing a blue shirt: WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 29: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wears a face covering during news conference at the U.S. Capitol, April 29, 2020 Washington, DC. Pelosi and Clyburn announced the Democratic members of the newly created House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Crisis. The committee will be chaired by Rep. Clyburn (D-SC) and the other members of the committee will be Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), Rep. Bill Foster (D-IL), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Rep. Andy Kim (D-NJ). (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
© Drew Angerer/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 29: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wears a face covering during news conference at the U.S. Capitol, April 29, 2020 Washington, DC. Pelosi and Clyburn announced the Democratic members of the newly created House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Crisis. The committee will be chaired by Rep. Clyburn (D-SC) and the other members of the committee will be Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), Rep. Bill Foster (D-IL), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Rep. Andy Kim (D-NJ). (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
The bill is expected to mirror -- and potentially go beyond -- the $2 trillion measure enacted in late March, which was the third relief measure from Congress and amounted to the largest rescue package in American history.


While the House has been out of session amid the deadly pandemic, Democrats have been working for weeks behind the scenes to piece together the bill, which is expected to include direct assistance to Americans, bolster unemployment insurance, provide new funding for mail-in voting, bail out cash-strapped states and cities, give money for distressed businesses, help with student loan assistance and give aid for rent and mortgage payments.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been pushing to get the bill finalized and voted on by the full chamber this week.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer's office has advised members that the chamber could reconvene this week and that the earliest a vote would happen would be Friday. When members return, the House is also expected to take up an unprecedented rules change to allow members to vote on the floor remotely and proceed with committee action while away from Washington.


Pelosi has solicited proposals from all corners of her caucus in the hopes of putting together what she has called a "transformational" bill as the economy reels from the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

"We must 'Think Big' For The People now, because if we don't, it will cost more later," Pelosi wrote in a letter to her colleagues early Monday morning. "Not acting is the most expensive course."

The bill would be an opening salvo in the debate about whether to add more stimulus to the economy, even as the two sides remain extremely far apart.

Top White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett and other Trump administration officials asserted on Sunday that they do not believe a fourth economic stimulus package is needed right now.

Hassett told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" that he thinks it is still "premature" to pass a fourth phase of funding. He said the Trump administration is watching both economic activity and the path of the disease while assessing whether to move forward with more relief legislation.

That comes as Senate GOP leaders have made clear that there is no appetite for another sweeping relief package, saying they need to assess how the recent onslaught of funding has been implemented before taking another dramatic step.

Moreover, Democrats are pushing provisions that are expected to get sharp pushback from the GOP.

House Democrats are circulating provisions to allow all eligible voters to vote by mail, according to Democratic aides. It's unclear what ultimately will get into the package, which could include anywhere from $2 billion-$4 billion for expanded mail-in voting access.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Administration, told Democrats on a Thursday conference call about a number of different provisions, which Democrats argue is crucial to ensure the November elections can be carried out safely amid fears of another outbreak in the fall. But President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his disdain for such measures, arguing that it "doesn't work out well for Republicans."

Also Democrats are pushing hard to include direct assistance to Americans, including recurring payments of up to $2,000 a month during the crisis. Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, a leading proponent of the effort, told CNN Monday that he's "cautiously optimistic" the provisions will be included in the Democratic bill.

Pelosi, in her letter, also made clear her push to help state and cities, a figure she has previously floated could cost $1 trillion.

"We must act boldly to support state and local entities to address coronavirus-related outlays and lost revenue," she told Democrats.

But there are divisions among Senate Republicans over whether to support additional aid for state and local governments, with many arguing that those entities shouldn't be bailed out by the federal government after the March stimulus approved $150 billion for states and cities.

Over lunch last week, Republicans in the Senate debated whether to give state and local governments more money, with a number of Republicans sympathetic to the sharp revenue losses experienced by states and cities. Others want to hold the line amid growing deficit concerns.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, has indicated that he may be open to considering more money to help state and local governments, but only if it is conditioned on passing liability reforms to protect employers from a rash of lawsuits he believes will be aimed at them after the pandemic clears and businesses reopen. But Democratic leaders have pushed back strongly on that demand.

Considering the fact, that Restaurants have just re-opened their lobbies so customers can eat inside today, here in Arizona. The Dems wants more regulation to keep people inside their homes. I'm already sick and tired of not being able to do anything outside of working. Not only that but things are slowly going back to normal around here. The Dems are going to fuck up some legit businesses into bankruptcy with them trying to meddle the economy. (Not like they haven't already mind you.)
 
What a surprise, the Dems are at it again.




Considering the fact, that Restaurants have just re-opened their lobbies so customers can eat inside today, here in Arizona. The Dems wants more regulation to keep people inside their homes. I'm already sick and tired of not being able to do anything outside of working. Not only that but things are slowly going back to normal around here. The Dems are going to fuck up some legit businesses into bankruptcy with them trying to meddle the economy. (Not like they haven't already mind you.)
They might as well burn all of that money and give the resulting ashes to people, since it'll all become worthless due to inflation.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole