- Dołączono
- 27 Sty 2014
I know "on the spectrum" can mean just about anything in terms of cognitive functioning, but holy shit, I think the eldest is honest-to-God retarded. Like Down's level.
Holy shit.
Zinnia Jones / Satana Kennedy / Zachary Antolak / Zack Sklar / Lauren McNamara/Soersdal / @zjemptv - Queen of the Horse Dildos and Defender of Rapists; Transtrender Posing as a Transmedicalist; Dropped out of College after Falling in a Shallow River; Balls-free since 2024
- Twórca wątku chimpburgers
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
I know "on the spectrum" can mean just about anything in terms of cognitive functioning, but holy shit, I think the eldest is honest-to-God retarded. Like Down's level.
Holy shit.
- Dołączono
- 24 Mar 2016
But his mommy says he's a "genius"! I'm sure that handwriting just belongs to a future doctor trying to minimize liability for his rx pad.
- Dołączono
- 24 Sty 2018
I know its gross and horrible, but its also kinda funny in a way. They seem to think your kids won't rebel as teenagers if you just have the "right" opinions. The "right" opinions being, of course, the ones zach formed while he rebelled against his parents.
- Dołączono
- 24 Sie 2014
Today on "Trump wants to get our kids killed":
I seriously doubt many kids feel going back to school means constant threat of death. Even if they did, Zach won't give a fuck. If he had his way his stepkids would be in boarding school.
He is distracting himself from what exactly?
Zach's "show", as a stay-at-home layabout, is the same with or without covid-19 hence it is easy for him to "go on". The same cannot be said of most people.
I can't make head or tails of this quote and I can't source it. Do terves seriously think that covid-19 is God's judgement on trannies?
I seriously doubt many kids feel going back to school means constant threat of death. Even if they did, Zach won't give a fuck. If he had his way his stepkids would be in boarding school.
He is distracting himself from what exactly?
Zach's "show", as a stay-at-home layabout, is the same with or without covid-19 hence it is easy for him to "go on". The same cannot be said of most people.
I can't make head or tails of this quote and I can't source it. Do terves seriously think that covid-19 is God's judgement on trannies?
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 25 Gru 2017
I'm sure the kid is trolling.
- Dołączono
- 10 Lut 2015
I thought eldest was supposed to be normal and youngest was the autist.
- Dołączono
- 2 Paź 2018
Queen of the-show-must-go-on, HAHA! He was locked up for what, 2 weeks, when he had his cabin fever meltdown? The little shit was just days away from going Florida Man.
I've got a good guess what pulled him back from the brink: the biggest lump of money he'd ever seen with his name on it. They can quarantine him forever, as long as they occasionally pay for buttplug safaris.
It's a self-reference, of course.
https://genderanalysis.net/2020/04/...how-transphobes-gambled-on-covid-19-and-lost/
- Dołączono
- 24 Sie 2019
He still has Penny listed as a member of the Gender Analysis team (with her picture). Can't bear to let him go, I guess. And I clicked on Heather's link in the blogroll and her blog isn't even set up. Such a professional website. Zach's got all the time in the world to update the site but he can't even bother to do that much. How is he ever going to be able to hold down a job where focusing on the details matter? LOL, as if he actually plans on getting a job, but doesn't Heather ever wonder how Zach, the poster boy for failure, is ever going to be able to pull his weight in the family? She has to be aware of his lack of work ethic by now.
- Dołączono
- 15 Sty 2014
Well, Zach is still secretly hoping Penny will come back for more rape. As for that other person, Harriet or whoever, Zach can’t be expected to sweat every little detail.
RIP Tranch
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 14 Gru 2019
Do we know what Penny's doing these days? His twitter is inactive and apparently his website domain has expired a while back. Has he just gone dark in fear of Zach?
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
This often happens when people leave an abusive man.
- Dołączono
- 24 Sie 2014
Penny's always had very little internet footprint, hence we have never found out his identity.
- Dołączono
- 2 Paź 2018
I'll bet if we ignore the McNamaras and revisit them in 10 years, they won't look much different. Zack will still be an angry shitposting layabout and Heather will still be lovesick and overworked. They will not have consummated their marriage and Zack's assplay will have tipped further into the grotesque (As a flabby 40 year old, he won't have much of an audience, though). Both will spray blame in every direction but their own for their disastrous lives.
Speaking of future McNamaras, your avatar looks like a time portal to Zack 2050. I won't be much surprised if he's putting on his eyebrows with a ruler by then, LOL.
I don't know if they're correct, but we have a couple of records.
- Dołączono
- 24 Sty 2018
no, they just pointed out that your gender identity won't save you from the death rate based on sex ( 65 ish percent male, 35ish percent female)
Whatsup bud?
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 29 Lis 2019
Penny is 32? She looks like a teenager compared to Z.
- Dołączono
- 12 Lis 2016
Penny looks like a 32 year old who takes care of him/herself.
ZJ doesn't look old exactly. ZJ looks dissipated.
ZJ doesn't look old exactly. ZJ looks dissipated.
TBM
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Lut 2015
Looks chemically burnt. Judging by that last halloween video,
- Dołączono
- 24 Sie 2014
Here is a long convo where Zach addresses the concerns of one critic, who takes issue with his "straight men should learn to love the dick".
What this critic means is that Zach and his ilk take their made-up idea of "women" to be the objective representation of the world. If straight men love to have sex with women, and transwomen are women, it stands to reason that straight men (and lesbians -- although Zach is quick to dismiss this) should not reject sexual encounters with transwomen.
Here is Zach's defense:
Nothing new here. Zach is merely reinstating -- rather than defending -- his belief that straight men, but not lesbians, should learn to love the dick. He also thinks it is beneficial for straight men to "reexamine" their genital preference -- how do you know you don't like it if you don't try? (How do you know you don't like eating shit if you don't try?)
Zach's critic remains civil but unconvinced.
Here are the genderanalysis articles flagged under "Philosophy and Language". This list has many pages. To me these look like an attack of "8-grade Biology".
The critic actually read those articles. He has stronger stomach than I do.
What the critic interprets Zach as saying is that a straight man makes his sexual decision on "does it make me gay or not?", with the word "gay" hanging purely on a linguistic peg. In other words, if language decides that traps are not gay, a straight man will have no compunction against fucking a trap (you can make an linguistic reductio ad absurdum and insist that straight men should put their dicks in a beartrap because "traps are not gay"). This is a very counter-intuitive take on sexuality.
Zach denies the pure linguistic take:
If you insist that "men who sleeps with a troon cannot be called a straight man", then you falls back into the linguistic trap that Zach's critic has warned Zach about. I guess we have to give some leeway to someone's self-professed sexual orientation: if a self-professed straight man who only sleeps with women gets an occasional blowjob from a dude, he is straight rather than bisexual.
Biology and biological sex, however, are a completely different matter.
Zach further elaborates his stance, which is just a more wordy and pretentious version of Dan Savage's "exclusion is wrong":
If a straight man wants to keep part of his sexuality private, he has every right to do so. Not everything is activism. Not everything is politics.
And what "social threat"? "No one wants to fuck me" is not a social threat.
His critic seems to have found a common ground with Zach:
This post is long as it is and I won't dive into the metaphysical rabbit hole of Natural Categories and of Universals and Particulars. Here is the genderanalysis article if you are interested.
Notice how Zach holds fast on the categories "straight men" and "women" yet at the same time questions the validity of categories? Recall his favorite quote "The Map is Not the Territory". Zach is in effect holding out two Maps: one says "straight men are lovers of woman" and the other "a woman is whoever who say she is one", and insist that the Territory changes to match both Maps.
Perhaps the moral of this long story is this: troons love categories if they serve them, but hate them if they run counter to their interests?
+ + + +
Zach is concerned that terves might have forgotten his reputation.
Feeling horny while watching Star Trek.
Zach congratulates himself for encouraging academic pursuits for other people:
If you need Zach, of all people, to goad you on, you really should take a good look at your life.
What this critic means is that Zach and his ilk take their made-up idea of "women" to be the objective representation of the world. If straight men love to have sex with women, and transwomen are women, it stands to reason that straight men (and lesbians -- although Zach is quick to dismiss this) should not reject sexual encounters with transwomen.
Here is Zach's defense:
Nothing new here. Zach is merely reinstating -- rather than defending -- his belief that straight men, but not lesbians, should learn to love the dick. He also thinks it is beneficial for straight men to "reexamine" their genital preference -- how do you know you don't like it if you don't try? (How do you know you don't like eating shit if you don't try?)
Zach's critic remains civil but unconvinced.
Here are the genderanalysis articles flagged under "Philosophy and Language". This list has many pages. To me these look like an attack of "8-grade Biology".
The critic actually read those articles. He has stronger stomach than I do.
What the critic interprets Zach as saying is that a straight man makes his sexual decision on "does it make me gay or not?", with the word "gay" hanging purely on a linguistic peg. In other words, if language decides that traps are not gay, a straight man will have no compunction against fucking a trap (you can make an linguistic reductio ad absurdum and insist that straight men should put their dicks in a beartrap because "traps are not gay"). This is a very counter-intuitive take on sexuality.
Zach denies the pure linguistic take:
If you insist that "men who sleeps with a troon cannot be called a straight man", then you falls back into the linguistic trap that Zach's critic has warned Zach about. I guess we have to give some leeway to someone's self-professed sexual orientation: if a self-professed straight man who only sleeps with women gets an occasional blowjob from a dude, he is straight rather than bisexual.
Biology and biological sex, however, are a completely different matter.
Zach further elaborates his stance, which is just a more wordy and pretentious version of Dan Savage's "exclusion is wrong":
If a straight man wants to keep part of his sexuality private, he has every right to do so. Not everything is activism. Not everything is politics.
And what "social threat"? "No one wants to fuck me" is not a social threat.
His critic seems to have found a common ground with Zach:
This post is long as it is and I won't dive into the metaphysical rabbit hole of Natural Categories and of Universals and Particulars. Here is the genderanalysis article if you are interested.
Notice how Zach holds fast on the categories "straight men" and "women" yet at the same time questions the validity of categories? Recall his favorite quote "The Map is Not the Territory". Zach is in effect holding out two Maps: one says "straight men are lovers of woman" and the other "a woman is whoever who say she is one", and insist that the Territory changes to match both Maps.
Perhaps the moral of this long story is this: troons love categories if they serve them, but hate them if they run counter to their interests?
+ + + +
Zach is concerned that terves might have forgotten his reputation.
Feeling horny while watching Star Trek.
Zach congratulates himself for encouraging academic pursuits for other people:
If you need Zach, of all people, to goad you on, you really should take a good look at your life.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 31 Gru 2018
I know I'm a few days :late: with this but few of his tweets have made me genuinely lol and this is #1 of them. These posts are so funny to anyone who has completed math courses at an advanced level, especially right after Zach's tweets wondering how far he can go in the field of mathematics. "These high school math courses are so EASY!" declares the 31-year-old man who pretends to be a woman. "Is there any level of MATHEMATICS that can truly challenge my BIG BRAIN??" Maybe try to get to an actual college math class before you boast about your skills, dolt. If freshman-level classes are 100 levels, to complete a B.A. in Mathematics, you have to take all of the required 100- and 200-levels like Calculus I, II, and III, Analysis, Logic, and maybe even a computer science/programming course. Then you have to take a certain number of credits in 300- and 400- level electives. Zach is currently "working his way through" the 000- level remedial prerequisites, he hasn't even reached e and imaginary numbers yet lmao. My prediction (guess) is that he taps out at precalculus and never completes the prerequisites for his precious statistics classes. His leaps of logic in writing do not translate well to proofs, which I believe they should be introducing at college trigonometry.
I also refuse to apologize for doubting that he was even attending college in the first place. My suspicion was always that other than one or two required orientation/bullshit classes he has been taking online classes for a while. Note that he never sperged about a sudden change to online format this semester, only that Heather and the kids were home all day, and that after a certain point, he stopped posting about meeting and sitting in class with other students. He switched to online classes before the pandemic began, probably when he was taking the speech class that he couldn't find 2 friends for. He stopped commenting on how amazingly he was getting along with kids a decade younger than him, and never once mentioned gross cafeteria food, seeing something weird at the library, or any other stuff that would show that he was actually physically on campus. He's taking online math classes to make the prerequisites to take community college classes and bragging about getting an A in algebra lmao. What a chump. At this rate it'll take him 4 years to get a 2-year degree. "Pseudo intellectual" is the perfect tag for his thread.