Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

"22 credible witnesses against Trump"

You mean the women who only started to accuse him all at the same time during his run for president and have remained completely silent thereafter? Sure, definitely sounds more credible than the one woman who made multiple attempts to bring her assault to light in the past and who's assaulter is openly refusing to have records relating to it viewed.

I swear this smear campaign against Tara is starting to disgust me as well.
 
"22 credible witnesses against Trump"

You mean the women who only started to accuse him all at the same time during his run for president and have remained completely silent thereafter?

The "What about Trump???" Biden-defenders throw around all kinds of wild numbers of "Trump accusers": 22, 27, 30...
The only way to get to those numbers, is to include accusations of unwanted hugs/kisses/looks (rather than sexual assault).
Of which Biden has his fair share, too - and unlike Trump, Biden is on camera doing that kind of thing over and over again.

So the "But what about Trump? Biden has 1 accusation and Trump 30!" argument is not just exceptional Whataboutism, but also a lie.

I've also noticed that the lists of "Trump accusers" that are furiously shared on Twitter tend to include former accusers that have long since recanted.

And of course they include the alleged girl that was "enslaved by Epstein and raped by Trump when she was 13", where we don't know if the accuser even exists, because all we have is a civil lawsuit by some shady Dem lawyer "on her behalf", that had to be thrown out by the judge because it listed a fake address in the paperwork and then was never refiled properly.

If someone has a list of the actual outstanding sexual assault accusations against Trump (meaning: where an accuser has actually personally come forward, and it been has neither been recanted/withdrawn or proven false), please share. Just because we make fun of TDS, doesn't mean we should ignore Trump's shit.

Are there even any such accusations?
(Other than E. Jean Carroll, whose accusation I suppose hasn't been literally proven false, it's just that not even the Dems take her seriously after her kooky CNN interview.)
 
Atlantic City has had an issue since the 90's in that the real high-roller clientele will just pay a little extra on top of whatever they were gonna blow to jet to Vegas to do it where the glitz and cache' for gamblers is a bit better. AC casinos, meanwhile, attract the kind of person like Aunt Maybel from Wildwood, NJ who drives her Buick down to the beach for slots and coffee every weekend, but never is going to drop seven figures at the craps table to impress her friends, she doesn't have that kind of wealth anyway.

Yeah, money is money, but, it's a "blue collar" gambler's town. There was a big push to bring Vegas-style gambling to AC in the 90' and early 00's around the time "Old Vegas" was being redeveloped and the last of the old "Mob" casinos and Mom n' Pop ones that offered ball pits for the kiddies were being bulldozed for a more VIP focused model. As it turned out, the high operating costs of luxury casinos with floor shows and the like meant they never had a chance to recoup their sky-high initial investments from just seniors playing the slots. The Great Recession killed a lot of them, just took a few years for them to bleed out.

Trump coming on board in AC was seen as a last ditch attempt to make what was a fundamentally unworkable business model work. And even at the time, it was doubted it would

So, trying to pin the shuttered joints on the boardwalk on Trump ignores the fact they were dying when he came to town and just failed to resuscitate them.

Did he take a chance to dump bad money in a hole that was about to be tagged "Bankruptcy"? Probably

Was that scummy? Probably

But those casinos were never going to live and to this day large chunks of AC's gambling industry is slowly going away as it's novelty as the place other than Vegas that you can gamble isn't enough to support a Vegas-style model.
The opening of Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods drew a lot of people away. Now you also have Bethlehem Sands and Mt. Airy Lodge.
 
"22 credible witnesses against Trump"

You mean the women who only started to accuse him all at the same time during his run for president and have remained completely silent thereafter? Sure, definitely sounds more credible than the one woman who made multiple attempts to bring her assault to light in the past and who's assaulter is openly refusing to have records relating to it viewed.

I swear this smear campaign against Tara is starting to disgust me as well.
I don't even know if what she said is accurate. I'm open to being wrong, but the fact that the Dems are going into panic mode over this is really suspicious, especially when they went all-in on Kavanaugh's accuser (who has since admitted that she made the whole thing up for political clout).

#BelieveAllWomen... unless they're inconvenient to our narrative.
 
I don't even know if what she said is accurate. I'm open to being wrong, but the fact that the Dems are going into panic mode over this is really suspicious, especially when they went all-in on Kavanaugh's accuser (who has since admitted that she made the whole thing up for political clout).

#BelieveAllWomen... unless they're inconvenient to our narrative.
#BelieveSomeWomen
 
I don't even know if what she said is accurate. I'm open to being wrong, but the fact that the Dems are going into panic mode over this is really suspicious, especially when they went all-in on Kavanaugh's accuser (who has since admitted that she made the whole thing up for political clout).
Which accuser was that again?
 
Kavanaugh's accuser (who has since admitted that she made the whole thing up for political clout).

Not quite.

Debra Katz, the lawyer who represented (and I guess coached) Ford, later on toured feminist conferences to brag about how Ford and her decided to come forward in order to "put an asterisk next to Kavanaugh's name" and effectively make it harder for him to rule against feminist holy cows like Roe vs Wade.

It's not an admission that they lied, but it does present a clear motive to lie.

(I don't think Ford herself has commented about this.)
 
The "What about Trump???" Biden-defenders throw around all kinds of wild numbers of "Trump accusers": 22, 27, 30...
The only way to get to those numbers, is to include accusations of unwanted hugs/kisses/looks (rather than sexual assault).
Of which Biden has his fair share, too - and unlike Trump, Biden is on camera doing that kind of thing over and over again.

So the "But what about Trump? Biden has 1 accusation and Trump 30!" argument is not just exceptional Whataboutism, but also a lie.

I've also noticed that the lists of "Trump accusers" that are furiously shared on Twitter tend to include former accusers that have long since recanted.

And of course they include the alleged girl that was "enslaved by Epstein and raped by Trump when she was 13", where we don't know if the accuser even exists, because all we have is a civil lawsuit by some shady Dem lawyer "on her behalf", that had to be thrown out by the judge because it listed a fake address in the paperwork and then was never refiled properly.

If someone has a list of the actual outstanding sexual assault accusations against Trump (meaning: where an accuser has actually personally come forward, and it been has neither been recanted/withdrawn or proven false), please share. Just because we make fun of TDS, doesn't mean we should ignore Trump's shit.

Are there even any such accusations?
(Other than E. Jean Carroll, whose accusation I suppose hasn't been literally proven false, it's just that not even the Dems take her seriously after her kooky CNN interview.)
The funny thing about Twitter libs is how they always say whataboutism without realizing how the biden case applies to them when they always bring up trump.
The excuse i hear is that the reason that the "25 women accusing trump" fear that they'll get sued and or fear for their lifes.
The only thing they have is trunp saying grab them by the pussy.

(archive)

Also, this:
Wyświetl załącznik 1270607
(archive)

Look at those likes.
They're really going all-in on pretending that Tara Reade's accusation has been "debunked" just because Biden denied it and Reade canceled her Fox News interview following death threats.

EDIT: Fixed archive link, used thumbnail.

(archive)

Also, this:
Wyświetl załącznik 1270607
(archive)

Look at those likes.
They're really going all-in on pretending that Tara Reade's accusation has been "debunked" just because Biden denied it and Reade canceled her Fox News interview following death threats.

EDIT: Fixed archive link, used thumbnail.
I found this in the reply.
Screenshot_20200504-092008_Chrome.jpg
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The funny thing about Twitter libs is how they always say whataboutism without realizing how the biden case applies to them when they always bring up trump.
The excuse i hear is that the reason that the "25 women accusing trump" fear that they'll get sued and or fear for their lifes.
The only thing they have is trunp saying grab them by the pussy.




I found this in the reply.Wyświetl załącznik 1270744

Man, I love how they scream to investigate ALL 22 or 25 or 30 women who have accused Trump (despite most of these allegations being bunk at this point), but are totally fine with Biden just saying "No, I didn.. di..did not do these things."

I don't even care about the alleged rape or whatever Biden is accused of (because no real public investigation has occurred yet, so I'm sort of hesitant to form an opinion on it yet), I'm just dumbfounded by the sheer amount of Twitter Libs jerking themselves off to how much they believe Biden despite being sexually assaulted themselves all in the name of owning Cheetolini.
 
"22 credible witnesses against Trump"

You mean the women who only started to accuse him all at the same time during his run for president and have remained completely silent thereafter? Sure, definitely sounds more credible than the one woman who made multiple attempts to bring her assault to light in the past and who's assaulter is openly refusing to have records relating to it viewed.

I swear this smear campaign against Tara is starting to disgust me as well.

They keep pushing this stuff in an attempt to say "Well Trump is twenty-two to twenty-five times the rapist Biden is so you're still worse if you vote for Trump!"

The difference being, of course, that I'd guess 99.9% of Trump's voters think the accusations against him are bullshit. Whereas it's looking more and more like the vast majority of Biden's voters believe he did it but are eager to vote for him anyway. Pretty much all of the rest were the ones who were saying "Even an accusation is too much" and "Believe all women" when it was Trump and Kavanaugh, so even if they don't believe Reade they're supposed to and are going to vote for the man she accused anyway.

Seems to me the only ones voting for someone they think is a rapist are registered Democrats.
 

Look...Slammin' Joe did nothing wrong. Just because Lori Klausutis was found dead in his office does not mean anyone should look into Joe as a suspect! There is absolutely nothing suspicious about a 28 year-old having a cardiac event, passing out, hitting her head on a desk and dying. Everyone knows 28 year-olds constantly pass out and hit their heads on desks. It is a leading cause of death among 28 year-olds!

Why was she in the office alone? Don't know! Why does Slammin' Joe accuse people of calling him a murderer when they so much as mention her? Don't know! How does someone with no charisma, intelligence, or insight continue to have a television show? Don't know!

The funny thing about Twitter libs is how they always say whataboutism without realizing how the biden case applies to them when they always bring up trump.
The excuse i hear is that the reason that the "25 women accusing trump" fear that they'll get sued and or fear for their lifes.
The only thing they have is trunp saying grab them by the pussy.




I found this in the reply.Wyświetl załącznik 1270744

Which Trump accuser's mother called into Larry King's show in 1993? Which Trump accuser filed a criminal complaint? Which Trump accuser even stuck around after their media pay day? Did Biden's accuser go on CNN and make themselves look like an absolute nutjob before they hit on Anderson Cooper and called rape hot?

See the difference between the absolutely not credible Trump accusers and the actually credible Biden accuser is well Reade is actually credible.

Now I still do not think you can say Biden is guilty without a trial...at least not of this action.

However there is plenty of video of him being incredibly creepy with the hair sniffing and inappropriate with children. That should matter to the left but Dems seem to have no problem with rapists and pedophiles. Just ask the Clintons.

And going into Kavanaugh for a moment:

Ford was discredited. The media has done an admirable job of burying that fact but she named one corroborating witness. That witness stated the event never happened that completely discredits the already incredibly vague accusation made by Ford. Where did it happen? Don't know! How did you get there? Don't know! How did you get home? Don't know! The Avenatti bunch were all discredited. Instead of being charged with perjury Ford was given a seven figure payday.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole