Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Ashen One]

I have to apply the same standard as I did with the Kavenaugh case and ask why Tara Reade didn't come forward years ago and waits until now. Not saying her story isn't true, but that's what I asked with Ford so that's what I must ask now. Epic hypocrisy of the Dems aside, what does KF think of the actual facts of this? Did he do it or not?

Spoiler

Personal opinion, it seems very possible Biden did do it. Unless Tara and her mother have been planning this out for 30 years, with phone calls to TV programs (which, whoops, just so happened to become unavailable once people started pointing it out, funny that) and were just biding (heh) their time.

All the photos, videos and whatnots of Biden getting touchy-feely with women and girls in public events, in plain view, in front of cameras don't exactly help ol' Uncle Joe's image either.

That being said, I agree with you. It was 30 years ago, longer than some people in my family have even been alive. There is no way to properly conduct an investigation into something so long after it happened. All the evidence is long gone and it will boil down to an endless "he said, she said". If if did happen I feel bad for Tara, but I also do think she used the accusation specifically to damage Joe rather than because she wanted "justice". I don't believe she would have had this sudden urge to reveal that Joe Biden raped her had he not become the nominee, it's just too convenient.

tl;dr: I do think it happened, but the timing of Tara's accusation is way too convenient for it to not have been motivated by Biden becoming the nominee.

But let's be honest, whether Biden did or did not rape Tara is irrelevant to pretty much everyone at this point. It has become extremely politicized for people to have a neutral view on it, so don't expect it to become anything less that a shitshow regardless of what happens. Well, that and the display of hypocrisy on how accusations are handled depending on which letter comes after the accused's name.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Spoiler

Personal opinion, it seems very possible Biden did do it. Unless Tara and her mother have been planning this out for 30 years, with phone calls to TV programs (which, whoops, just so happened to become unavailable once people started pointing it out, funny that) and were just biding (heh) their time.

All the photos, videos and whatnots of Biden getting touchy-feely with women and girls in public events, in plain view, in front of cameras don't exactly help ol' Uncle Joe's image either.

That being said, I agree with you. It was 30 years ago, longer than some people in my family have even been alive. There is no way to properly conduct an investigation into something so long after it happened. All the evidence is long gone and it will boil down to an endless "he said, she said". If if did happen I feel bad for Tara, but I also do think she used the accusation specifically to damage Joe rather than because she wanted "justice". I don't believe she would have had this sudden urge to reveal that Joe Biden raped her had he not become the nominee, it's just too convenient.

tl;dr: I do think it happened, but the timing of Tara's accusation is way too convenient for it to not have been motivated by Biden becoming the nominee.

But let's be honest, whether Biden did or did not rape Tara is irrelevant to pretty much everyone at this point. It has become extremely politicized for people to have a neutral view on it, so don't expect it to become anything less that a shitshow regardless of what happens. Well, that and the display of hypocrisy on how accusations are handled depending on which letter comes after the accused's name.

The thing is it can be true and a political hitjob or not true and a political hitjob. We see all the time with the Democrats that the things they accuse others of doing is what they're actually doing. They also have no problem with using lies to take down their enemies, with using standards they don't believe in to destroy their enemies while not letting those standards be used against them.

Rules for Radicals is their playbook and they can't ever move past it.

 

[It's HK-47]

"I'm sorry Tara, I believe Joe Biden is a rapist, but I still support him because Orange Man Bad."

Holy fucking shit.

 

[Ashen One]

Wyświetl załącznik 1268908

"I'm sorry Tara, I believe Joe Biden is a rapist, but I still support him because Orange Man Bad."

Holy fucking shit.

I don't even know what to say. This is such a retärded thing to broadcast to the world because you're being a fucking awful person no matter how you look at it. Why say anything if THIS is what you're going to say? Speech may be silver, but silence is golden.

 

[vertexwindi]

Wyświetl załącznik 1268908

"I'm sorry Tara, I believe Joe Biden is a rapist, but I still support him because Orange Man Bad."

Holy fucking shit.

Yeah but Orange Man says mean things on Twitter. That's like 20 times a worse crime.

 

[Witthel]

Wyświetl załącznik 1268908

"I'm sorry Tara, I believe Joe Biden is a rapist, but I still support him because Orange Man Bad."

Holy fucking shit.

I don't think I've ever seen a closer equivalent to doublethink in my life.

Yeah, I know that 1984 references are starting to get old, but still.

 

[Ilmseil]

Fucking lmao, what do you even say to that?

 

[polyester]

Personal opinion, it seems very possible Biden did do it. Unless Tara and her mother have been planning this out for 30 years, with phone calls to TV programs (which, whoops, just so happened to become unavailable once people started pointing it out, funny that) and were just biding (heh) their time.

It's definitely possible.

But it's also possible that it was really just some minor "unwanted hand on shoulder" type of thing, and that she's now opportunistically upgrading it to finger rape.
The harassment complaint and the corroborations by her mother/neighbor/etc. don't contradict this, I think.

The one thing we know for sure, is that #MeToo and #BelieveWomen have exposed themselves as absolute hypocrites.

the timing of Tara's accusation is way too convenient for it to not have been motivated by Biden becoming the nominee.

If you'll allow me a somewhat cynical perspective:
In order to hurt Biden, it would have been more convenient to come forward earlier, when all the other Dem nominees were still in the race. (This may well have pushed Biden out of the race, as the other candidates wouldn't have immediately taken his side as they do now.)

Or if the motivation was to hurt Democrats and not only Biden, it would have been most convenient later in the year, when there's not enough time left for people to forget it or "tire of hearing about it" before the election (which is what will likely happen now).

It goes to show the difference between Reade's approch (go public all by yourself and hope the media will listen to you), and Ford's approach (secretly shop your story to the opposing political party, and have their operatives coach you and scrub your social media and get an opsec/research head-start for weeks, before they come out with it in the form of a well-timed and coordinated hit job against the accused).

 

[Super-Chevy454]

As if 2020 cannot get any worse. First the virus, now this.

https://www.newsweek.com/asian-giant-hornets-that-eat-honeybees-have-powerful-sting-discovered-washington-first-time-1478763

There's another thread about these hornets. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/track...-deadly-pest-has-reached-north-america.69134/

Meanwhile the WaPo decided to publish another hit piece "orange man bad" when as we see his approval ratings going up.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...post_publishes_a_hit_piece_against_trump.html

The Washington Post publishes a hit piece against Trump - American Th…

archived 3 May 2020 14:38:50 UTC

archive.vn

May 3, 2020
The Washington Post publishes a hit piece against Trump
By Andrea Widburg
The Washington Post has long been a Democrat party house organ, but it used to pretend to impartiality. Those days are over. It is so deeply committed to its anti-Trump narrative that its slogan, rather than being “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” should be “Whatever Trump’s for, we’re against it!” In this case, Trump stands for blaming China for its unconscionable behavior vis-à-vis the Wuhan virus and for wanting to reopen the economy before America looks like Venezuela.
On Saturday, the WaPo published a lengthy “investigative” piece entitled “34 days of pandemic: Inside Trump’s desperate attempts to reopen America.” The five people who wrote the piece boast about having spoken with 82 administration officials, but this is not an objective look at the data. The article's premise is that is a moron Trump who cares only about reelection. Along the way, it misstates and ignores facts, and spins so fast it makes a person motion sick.
There are three useful things to keep in mind before looking at the piece. First, its publication coincides with a Gallup poll showing that Trump’s approval rating has gone up six points in two weeks. Second, even anti-Trump stalwarts such as Nate Silver are finding it hard to look at the evidence and then continue to attack Trump:

 

[Iron Hamster]

Wyświetl załącznik 1268908

"I'm sorry Tara, I believe Joe Biden is a rapist, but I still support him because Orange Man Bad."

Holy fucking shit.

Wow. If that's not a dagger in the feminist agenda..........

 

[Ilmseil]

I think she deleted it already. Looking at the rest of her tweets, and it's filled with sanctimonious bullshit about generic shitlib "causes". What a fucking ghoul.

 

[Salty Boris]

Epic hypocrisy of the Dems aside, what does KF think of the actual facts of this? Did he do it or not?

Look at the way he behaves in public. He consistently behaves inappropriately towards women. It’s easy to believe he did something worse in private.

It’s the timing that bothers me. This guy has been in the public eye for decades. Why wait til now to bring it out? I guess you could argue metoo bullshit makes it easier. But this kind of shit isn’t new (Anita Hill). This is almost certainly an op.

The question is who’s op is it? Is it her op as vengeance for some perceived wrong doing, a GOP operation, who knows? It could even be a DNC op to try to get a more desirable candidate.

With all the shit I’ve seen the last few months, the desperation to oust Trump, the Impeachment this new Flynn shit being revealed, the FISA warrant crap, and the doozy of it all the willingness to overly politicize the COVID shit while significant numbers of people are still dying, I’m willing to believe almost anything at this point.

 

[wopirish]

https://twitter.com/LisaBloom/status/1256327017911382018
Lisa's tweet is still up and the comments are woooboy.

 

[Ilmseil]

Whether or not he did it is frankly irrelevant at this point. I wouldn't be shocked either way, but the real takeaway here is the lol-fucking-tastic speed the mask dropped from any pretense of giving a shit about women, or sex assault survivors, or really anything at all. Remember, being a shitlib isn't so much about having any convictions whatsoever, it's 100% about being able to feel good about yourself and getting asspats from your equally enlightened friends for saying the right words. Actions are irrelevant. This thread comes to mind very quickly.

 

[Maamtis]

I don't even know what to say. This is such a retärded thing to broadcast to the world because you're being a fucking awful person no matter how you look at it. Why say anything if THIS is what you're going to say? Speech may be silver, but silence is golden.

I wonder if this will only serve to push voters away from the Democrats. Their supporters have really shit the bed and I don't blame anyone who doesn't want to get in it with them.

Look at the way he behaves in public. He consistently behaves inappropriately towards women. It’s easy to believe he did something worse in private.

It’s the timing that bothers me. This guy has been in the public eye for decades. Why wait til now to bring it out? I guess you could argue metoo bullshit makes it easier. But this kind of shit isn’t new (Anita Hill). This is almost certainly an op.

The question is who’s op is it? Is it her op as vengeance for some perceived wrong doing, a GOP operation, who knows? It could even be a DNC op to try to get a more desirable candidate.

With all the shit I’ve seen the last few months, the desperation to oust Trump, the Impeachment this new Flynn shit being revealed, the FISA warrant crap, and the doozy of it all the willingness to overly politicize the COVID shit while significant numbers of people are still dying, I’m willing to believe almost anything at this point.

I wouldn't be surprised if this was Trump paying the Dems back for all the shit they put him through these past 4 years. Makes me wonder if this is just the beginning.

 

[Skin and Bones]

I don't even know what to say. This is such a retärded thing to broadcast to the world because you're being a fucking awful person no matter how you look at it. Why say anything if THIS is what you're going to say? Speech may be silver, but silence is golden.

You have to view the situation through the eyes of social justice. Trump is the Ultimate Evil and most be stopped at all costs. Biden is opposing him and must be supported. But rape is also bad, so what do you do to avoid looking like a hypocrite? You tell people you do care, but you have to defeat evil so sorry I guess. Crisis averted.

 

[Corn Flakes]

The question is who’s op is it? Is it her op as vengeance for some perceived wrong doing, a GOP operation, who knows? It could even be a DNC op to try to get a more desirable candidate.

Considering how Hillary had been hovering over the Primaries like a pantsuited vulture, I wouldn't be surprised if this was a power play to give us Bodycount Woman vs. Orange Man 2: Electric Boogaloo. Hillary already has a ton of visibility -- people know who Hillary is a lot more than Biden, plus a lot of inertia from her 2016 campaign -- and a relatively "young" (fuck, are we calling 72 young now? What a geriatric election) woman replacing a senile white male rapist would be a huge boost to the DNC's voting base's enthusiasm.

Of course, this is all very silly. , even. But it would be just so much fun to see Hillary trying to roll in as the Great Savior... and then lose again.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

This Tara Raede controversy is going to shred what little remains of Democratic Party unity come November. You can quote me on that.

 

[Maamtis]

Considering how Hillary has been hovering over the Primaries like a pantsuited vulture, I wouldn't be surprised if this was a power play to give us Bodycount Woman vs. Orange Man 2: Electric Boogaloo. Hillary already has a ton of visibility -- people know who Hillary is a lot more than Biden, plus a lot of inertia from her 2016 campaign -- and a relatively "young" (fuck, are we calling 72 young now? What a geriatric election) woman replacing a senile white male rapist would be a huge boost to the DNC's voting base's enthusiasm.

Of course, this is all very silly. , even. But it would be just so much fun to see Hillary trying to roll in as the Great Savior... and then lose again.

I could see this backfiring spectacularly with Democrat base (especially the Bernie Bros) left feeling like she's stolen the nomination again. To the neutrals she's probably seen as a loser, a sore one at that. That said she is, sadly, the Democrats best candidate.

 

[Corn Flakes]

I could see this backfiring spectacularly with Democrat base (especially the Bernie Bros) left feeling like she's stolen the nomination again. To the neutrals she's probably seen as a loser, a sore one at that. That said she is, sadly, the Democrats best candidate.

Let me make it perfectly clear, I don't think that's what's going to happen. It would be funny as hell and I dearly wish that's what would happen, but I realy don't think Hillary can pull off a 4D-chess maneuver like that.

Not without leaving a very obvious trail of corpses behind her, anyway.