Comicsgate Hangers-On and Drama Whores - A thread about some guy who's mad about Star Wars and the neckbeards obsessively stalking him

Nah, fits. You have a long term history online with these kinds of things. Sadly, there are way worse things than trolling in comics.

Yes, it fits. I do engage with goofballs routinely on the internet.

It must actually be me.

You can certainly banter better than King of Pol. I do still look forward to the inevitable in-thread tantrum

This whole thread has been a tantrum.

...oh, you mean you want a tantrum FROM ME.
 
This whole thread has been a tantrum.

...oh, you mean you want a tantrum FROM ME.

Well, the thread is about you and that one moron who was demanding you pay his credit card interest, and not most of the other shrieking spergs in here, right? Don't force it, though. An organic tantrum will be all the more entertaining
 
Adamska, when you've been hip deep in comicsgate and watched it all go down, you can get back to me. Until then, Find someone that GAFs and cry more to them about your fee fees.
Hilarious, as this implies I wasn't aware of and participated at all in this farce as a consumer and viewer and haven't seen the last time a "movement" like this became obsessed with tween drama and clique shit. Keep being condescending and wonder why no one will back you.

I mean, it worked so well with the tardposters who conveniently never made a thread on their target.
 
Hilarious, as this implies I wasn't aware of and participated at all in this farce as a consumer and viewer and haven't seen the last time a "movement" like this became obsessed with tween drama and clique shit. Keep being condescending and wonder why no one will back you.

I mean, it worked so well with the tardposters who conveniently never made a thread on their target.
To be a little fair, there was an attempt last month. A hilariously poor attempt, but an attempt nonetheless. The little weirdo disappeared after that thread too. And not gonna lie, but I'm coming around more and more to that idea of "haters" making acconts and sperging harder than EVS has ever done to deflect criticisms because someone competent should made a decent thread by now if they gave a shit. There's certainly enough dumb drama to pull from the CG thread alone. That or he's just lucky enough to be intensely hated by a bunch of morons that do more damage to themselves than their actual target

 
I'm personally not concerned with anyone backing me. I am however finding a shit-ton of irony about a Kiwi with his fee fees in a joint over someone being condescending.

Nor am I concerned with anyone backing Comicsgate or not. The people who agree with it will back it regardless of the wailing and gnashing of teeth the antis/SJWs offer up... and those who don't agree with their tantrum, won't. Considering how all the ...ahem... 'problematic' personalities AND smaller/newer guys in CG seem to get their funding goals rapidly met (sometimes in under an hour in the case of Zak and that awful/vile/evil/doubleplus realbad Ethan Van Scyver!!!!! huff, pant, stomp), I'll go out on a limb and say that making threads or videos or whatever showflakes do about them isn't hurting their support any.

But you do you. Post whatever emojis sooth your bruised emotional state.
 
I'm personally not concerned with anyone backing me. I am however finding a shit-ton of irony about a Kiwi with his fee fees in a joint over someone being condescending.

Nor am I concerned with anyone backing Comicsgate or not. The people who agree with it will back it regardless of the wailing and gnashing of teeth the antis/SJWs offer up... and those who don't agree with their tantrum, won't. Considering how all the ...ahem... 'problematic' personalities AND smaller/newer guys in CG seem to get their funding goals rapidly met (sometimes in under an hour in the case of Zak and that awful/vile/evil/doubleplus realbad Ethan Van Scyver!!!!! huff, pant, stomp), I'll go out on a limb and say that making threads or videos or whatever showflakes do about them isn't hurting their support any.

But you do you. Post whatever emojis sooth your bruised emotional state.
Uh huh, keep projecting your own tard rage onto me as you do some more gay Discord ops for a manchild who burns toys and slapfights like tween girl.
To be a little fair, there was an attempt last month. A hilariously poor attempt, but an attempt nonetheless. The little weirdo disappeared after that thread too. And not gonna lie, but I'm coming around more and more to that idea of "haters" making acconts and sperging harder than EVS has ever done to deflect criticisms because someone competent should made a decent thread by now if they gave a shit. There's certainly enough dumb drama to pull from the CG thread alone. That or he's just lucky enough to be intensely hated by a bunch of morons that do more damage to themselves than their actual target

Yeah, it's official. Gay ops afoot.
 
Uh huh, keep projecting your own tard rage onto me as you do some more gay Discord ops for a manchild who burns toys and slapfights like tween girl.

Yeah, it's official. Gay ops afoot.
How odd. Those are two of the arguments that Renfamous and SJW spiderman pushed hard in their effort to get @FROG deplatformed on twitter and youtube. It was part of the whole "we fear for our safety" nonsense. Should I expect to see those claims pop up on the Farms as well? I guess everything old is new again.
 
How odd. Those are two of the arguments that Renfamous and SJW spiderman pushed hard in their effort to get @FROG deplatformed on twitter and youtube. It was part of the whole "we fear for our safety" nonsense. Should I expect to see those claims pop up on the Farms as well? I guess everything old is new again.
How odd you desperately keep on trying to strawman me as having their same tactics and arguments.

It's almost like you act exactly like the people you claim to hate and you have to try and poison the well.
 
Dunno, do you like being tribalistic and acting like corpsec for free from a guy that hates making his meh product?

this whole board is tribalistic we have anti CG and CG and here you are taking shots at both sides. As for his product being meh, he sure gets a whole lot of fan art and customers clamoring for his product. I don’t see any other indie comic getting that much attention, with the exception of The Expendables right now.
 
this whole board is tribalistic we have anti CG and CG and here you are taking shots at both sides. As for his product being meh, he sure gets a whole lot of fan art and customers clamoring for his product. I don’t see any other indie comic getting that much attention, with the exception of The Expendables right now.
And there's the common restaurant analogy used by failing owners where magical crowds appear when they don't like what they hear, and also ignores how he intentionally keeps shitting out tiny runs of it after the first round unlike every other indie comic in the gang; abusing paypig and collector desires to artificially prop up its interest, all just because he probably is pissed he didn't beat the Order of the Stick book.

And I'll happily shoot at both sides, because like Gamergate in 2015 onward and to a normal crowd of net users, you are both tards now fighting for a bunch of old men who should know better. I don't shit on Zack for example, because he was mature enough to not get into tard fights like this.
No, I'm pointing out that you are actually using the very same arguements. Not 'like' SJWs. You are using the same words they do. So if I think you are an SJW, it aint because I pulled it out of thin air. Thats all on you. Make better arguments.
This is proof you can't argue without tarring by association. You rely on this as this has been what you reached for every single time when people bother acknowledging you, meaning you can't actually debate without making up a weaker target.

GG, you're proving just why I shoot both ways.
 
And there's the common restaurant analogy used by failing owners where magical crowds appear when they don't like what they hear, and also ignores how he intentionally keeps shitting out tiny runs of it after the first round unlike every other indie comic in the gang; abusing paypig and collector desires to artificially prop up its interest, all just because he probably is pissed he didn't beat the Order of the Stick book.

And I'll happily shoot at both sides, because like Gamergate in 2015 onward and to a normal crowd of net users, you are both tards now fighting for a bunch of old men who should know better. I don't shit on Zack for example, because he was mature enough to not get into tard fights like this.

This is proof you can't argue without tarring by association. You rely on this as this has been what you reached for every single time when people bother acknowledging you, meaning you can't actually debate without making up a weaker target.

GG, you're proving just why I shoot both ways.
Get real. When you use the same arguments of an SJW, the same asinine arguments, then thats not me tarring by association. Thats you using SJW arguments. Again, thats on you.
 
Get real. When you use the same arguments of an SJW, the same asinine arguments, then thats not me tarring by association. Thats you using SJW arguments. Again, thats on you.
And yet you can't prove it and will keep trying this shittastic argument since the only opponent you can win against verbally is imaginary.
 
And there's the common restaurant analogy used by failing owners where magical crowds appear when they don't like what they hear, and also ignores how he intentionally keeps shitting out tiny runs of it after the first round unlike every other indie comic in the gang; abusing paypig and collector desires to artificially prop up its interest, all just because he probably is pissed he didn't beat the Order of the Stick book.

And I'll happily shoot at both sides, because like Gamergate in 2015 onward and to a normal crowd of net users, you are both tards now fighting for a bunch of old men who should know better. I don't shit on Zack for example, because he was mature enough to not get into tard fights like this.

This is proof you can't argue without tarring by association. You rely on this as this has been what you reached for every single time when people bother acknowledging you, meaning you can't actually debate without making up a weaker target.

GG, you're proving just why I shoot both ways.

So you‘re mad because he turned Cyberfrog into a business. If people want to buy his comics then they will no matter how many times he puts it out since there is obviously demand for it. No one is forcing the customer to whip his or her credit card and back his campaigns. They do it because they believe in CG and they like his product.

As for Order of the Stick, I’ve never heard of him once talking about that book. If anything, that should be an inspiration for him to beat that number.

Face it, CG is doing big things and haters like you are only fueling that progress.
 
So you‘re mad because he turned Cyberfrog into a business. If people want to buy his comics then they will no matter how many times he puts it out since there is obviously demand for it. No one is forcing the customer to whip his or her credit card and back his campaigns. They do it because they believe in CG and they like his product.

As for Order of the Stick, I’ve never heard of him once talking about that book. If anything, that should be an inspiration for him to beat that number.

Face it, CG is doing big things and haters like you are only fueling that progress.
This is pretty bad logic given I like Zack doing the same thing and actually surpassing the "professionals" in this regard; his cover is probably the one I'll buy from the lot because I like him. The reason I don't back Ethan as much still lies in the mixture of refusing to disengage from pointless e-slapfights he also provokes as much as the other people, his only recently fixed output problems, and his ego problems for what he is and where he stands.

I'll also note that he only seemed to ramp up new editions to actually make his bragging about being the biggest comic ever true when it got brought up here.

And the argument you're trying fails by the way: see any franchise that used the argument you just tried on me, a potential consumer who'd be willing to buy and did in the past. Brag all you want, but your gay movement peaked; it's now dying like Gamergate, and this condescension just accelerates it.
 
And yet you can't prove it and will keep trying this shittastic argument since the only opponent you can win against verbally is imaginary.
Oh but I dont need to 'prove' squat. Everyone following comicsgate has seen Renfamous and her merry band of snowflakes whine and cry about @FROG chopping up Rose Tico toys and here you are complaining about @FROG wrecking toys.

One of these things is EXACTLY the same as the other and here you are gaslighting up a thread saying that somehow it isn't.

Find someone else to sell it to.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole