From what I'm reading about this reaffirmation agreement... first, the judge needs to believe that you'll be able to make the payments and it's wise for the debtor to maintain this debt for years in the future without the option of another bankruptcy. Phil should fail there harder than anyone with his horrible financial responsibility and job with zero stability for 5+ years in the future, but then... the whole point of reaffirmation reads to me that your creditors work with you to lower your full payment. Why the fuck should any creditor agree to that for Phil? Especially for the Corolla which Phil has somehow only paid $1150 towards in 3 years. Take the asshole's khando and get your money.
I'm pretty sure he is $1150 ahead of the depreciated value of the Camry, not that he has only paid $1150 towards it.
It's quite funny though. He has had it for at least two years so has probably paid $10k on it. And done 5k miles. $2 a mile excluding any fuel and servicing costs. Surely it is cheaper just to take a fucking uber everywhere
