💊 Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

[4Macie]

@Holden won't answer any of the important questions, he flat out refuses to and goes after his personal vendettas. That's rude.

For example:
1) serious, are your family member alive and well? We aren't asking to mock you, we literally ask all lolcows who come on the forums these questions.
2) how would your perfect society deal with the fact that there are less females than males in the world? This means that there will be men without wives, which is basically condemning your fellow sane socieity men to incelity.
3) how do you know that even in a sane socieity where women want a provider, that they would still want you? if all of a sudden the world became Holden-sane, you are not fit to be a provider. You have no job and no trainable skills to do the jobs providers would have to do. You are also not strong enough to do backbreaking manual labor, and in a provider based society, those that can do manual labor are regarded higher than "brainy" people. There's always a need for manual labor and so those who do those jobs can always provide. A "intellect" will only be able to get certain jobs, and those jobs are not always available. These men would be less desirable as they cannot promise a woman will be provided for.

So as you see, even in a Sane socieity, you'd be screwed. There's still the men/women ratio gap and in a provider world non-manual laborers are basically lower class and not desirable.

 

[Positron]

"But...but...I'll have I job when I got my dick wet. It's BASICALLY PROMISED!"

 

[ChuckSlaughter]

get him arrested for being a nice guy since clearly if he was beating her like that she would worship him like a god.

You're really good at speaking marijan. My headmate holden is jealous.

@Holden won't answer any of the important questions, he flat out refuses to and goes after his personal vendettas. That's rude.

For example:
1) serious, are your family member alive and well? We aren't asking to mock you, we literally ask all lolcows who come on the forums these questions.
2) how would your perfect society deal with the fact that there are less females than males in the world? This means that there will be men without wives, which is basically condemning your fellow sane socieity men to incelity.
3) how do you know that even in a sane socieity where women want a provider, that they would still want you? if all of a sudden the world became Holden-sane, you are not fit to be a provider. You have no job and no trainable skills to do the jobs providers would have to do. You are also not strong enough to do backbreaking manual labor, and in a provider based society, those that can do manual labor are regarded higher than "brainy" people. There's always a need for manual labor and so those who do those jobs can always provide. A "intellect" will only be able to get certain jobs, and those jobs are not always available. These men would be less desirable as they cannot promise a woman will be provided for.

So as you see, even in a Sane socieity, you'd be screwed. There's still the men/women ratio gap and in a provider world non-manual laborers are basically lower class and not desirable.

@Holden is too dumb for brainwork and too weak and whiney for hard labor. The only thing he could hope to do is maybe take a shit tier McJob long enough to develop a skilled trade but I don't know if he's smart enough to do that.

@Holden Where did you ever get the idea that you're intelligent?

 

[24isthehighestnumber]

Marijan Siklic is profoundly stupid. He has yet to prove a single assertion of his. He also was never abused by his parents. He's also really stupid. And totally stupid. And a crybaby. And a stupid crybaby.

 

[HickoryDickory]

@Holden You speak of beating and mutilations quite a bit. Are you in to guro? Or is Nero your hero? He executed his mother and kicked a wife to death, after all.

I believe you might like this documentary, seeing as you are a learned history buff 'n all.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview. There is no research that proves your points either. You're just weasels who say "this is what everybody knows", as if that's some kind of argument. I at least try to back up my views with other methods, you don't even have that.

So, what is left? You claim that working can help get somebody a partner. Why would it, if seduction is what you stand for? Because if you don't stand for seduction you stand for arranged marriages or, even more extremely, men automatically getting a wife after earning enough. Which you don't stand for, right? So what do you stand for? Seduction. Which was never ever related to providing anything but stupidity. And this paradox is what proves you are almost certainly wrong about opposing my views

 

[jemas42]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview.

This might be the single most hilarious thing you've ever written, and that it saying something.

 

[CatParty]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview. There is no research that proves your points either. You're just weasels who say "this is what everybody knows", as if that's some kind of argument. I at least try to back up my views with other methods, you don't even have that.

So, what is left? You claim that working can help get somebody a partner. Why would it, if seduction is what you stand for? Because if you don't stand for seduction you stand for arranged marriages or, even more extremely, men automatically getting a wife after earning enough. Which you don't stand for, right? So what do you stand for? Seduction. Which was never ever related to providing anything but stupidity. And this paradox is what proves you are almost certainly wrong about opposing my views

we have all the citations of you saying you like blackmail and pedophilia and raping/attacking women and we also have citations of you being sexually attracted to FTMs

 

[Cubanodun]

A more obvious one is that they never did anything to help me with a phobia that made me unable to meet girls in the romantic context IRL until I was 18.

you wanted your mommy and daddy to get girlfriends to you, you are just a lazy fuck

They never taught me to rape and maim women

and you are a massive pussy to do it yourself

 

[ChuckSlaughter]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview. There is no research that proves your points either. You're just weasels who say "this is what everybody knows", as if that's some kind of argument. I at least try to back up my views with other methods, you don't even have that.

So, what is left? You claim that working can help get somebody a partner. Why would it, if seduction is what you stand for? Because if you don't stand for seduction you stand for arranged marriages or, even more extremely, men automatically getting a wife after earning enough. Which you don't stand for, right? So what do you stand for? Seduction. Which was never ever related to providing anything but stupidity. And this paradox is what proves you are almost certainly wrong about opposing my views

What about Carl sagan who reportedly bang a few girls at the same time?
What about Richard Stallman whose cleaning lady supposedly complained he would leave soggy condoms all over his office after boning whatever MIT freshman nerd girl caught his fancy that year? Stephen hawking is strangely popular with women...
ok so they're idiot seduces? Or are you just jealous and declaring yourself smarter than those you're jealous of is the defense of losers everywhere?

 

[XH 502]

@Holden, why don't you rape a woman? You'll get everything you ever wanted: praise, fame, and hordes of females wanting to fuck you. It's the best decision you could ever make in your life, so what's stopping you?

 

[Cubanodun]

Now he is in cringepics

marijan must be the third person i would not care if his body is eaten by wolfes

@Holden, why don't you rape a woman? You'll get everything you ever wanted: praise, fame, and hordes of females wanting to fuck you. It's the best decision you could ever make in your life, so what's stopping you?

my puush died but tl;dr he know is illegal

 

[4Macie]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview. There is no research that proves your points either. You're just weasels who say "this is what everybody knows", as if that's some kind of argument. I at least try to back up my views with other methods, you don't even have that.

So, what is left? You claim that working can help get somebody a partner. Why would it, if seduction is what you stand for? Because if you don't stand for seduction you stand for arranged marriages or, even more extremely, men automatically getting a wife after earning enough. Which you don't stand for, right? So what do you stand for? Seduction. Which was never ever related to providing anything but stupidity. And this paradox is what proves you are almost certainly wrong about opposing my views

My citations are, for the most part, myself and other ladies I know and talk with on a daily basis. Your world view is that women love violent men and rapists and want nothing more than their spines broken. I, as a woman, say that this isn't true. That's citation enough. You are a man and so I have a higher "authority of evidence" than you do in this situation.

If I were to say "Men love fucking sheep" and you said "No, they don't. I'm a man and I do not love fucking sheep", then I would have to be the one to prove men love fucking sheep.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

What for? I never had a problem with that part. As I said, my parents made two mistakes-

A more obvious one is that they never did anything to help me with a phobia that made me unable to meet girls in the romantic context IRL until I was 18. This was something that can't be forgiven. It was obvious I can't and they did nothing.

In the long run, more importantly but something I can less blame them for - they never taught me to rape and maim women. But that I can understand more since this wasn't needed when they got married and became needed in my county only at the turn of a century in case of men who can't use seduction.

A modern woman is an insane sexual receptacle. She cannot understand the idea of any relationship. She just wants to be fucked and tossed and will hate anybody who fails to do so.

A non-seductive man who doesn't break a woman's legs, spine and teeth is immediately seen as a loser.

My parents don't know how the modern world works. It works that I'd be much better off I had shot women in the head than ever studied or worked.

Being afraid to talk to girls isn't a phobia. It's called being a teenager. Most of us man up and get over it. Wack ass bitches like you join loveshy forums.

Quit avoiding my questions like a puss. Thanks bae.

 

[Chuggernaut]

Being afraid to talk to girls isn't a phobia. It's called being a teenager. Most of us man up and get over it. Wack ass bitches like you join loveshy forums.

Quit avoiding my questions like a puss. Thanks bae.

Solving problems on your own is something a man would do. Holden is nothing but an entitled child who expects people to solve all his problems for him and cries when they don't. Telling him to "man up" is like telling him to "giraffe up."

 

[Sammy]

we have all the citations of you saying you like blackmail and pedophilia and raping/attacking women and we also have citations of you being sexually attracted to FTMs

Wait, I missed that. So Holden wants to bang ladies who look like dudes now?
While spouting his typical over the top hatred and desire to do violence towards women?
And he's still insisting he's not gay?
Dude.
Holden.
I'mma talk straight with you.
On the level.

You're totally, completely, one hundred percent gay.
Gay as a pride parade in vegas when Lady Gaga is going to do a show and invite all the drag queens on stage and the confetti is free condoms kind of gay.

Everyone will be better for you if you can come to terms with this instead of fighting it so hard. You'll be happier, trust me.

 

[CatParty]

Wait, I missed that. So Holden wants to bang ladies who look like dudes now?

specifically Rika

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Solving problems on your own is something a man would do. Holden is nothing but an entitled child who expects people to solve all his problems for him and cries when they don't. Telling him to "man up" is like telling him to "giraffe up."

But... but... but.... his parents didn't hold his hand talking to girls. Only in a not sane society would his mom not fuck him because he has a case of the lonelys.

 

[Coldgrip]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview. There is no research that proves your points either.
You're just weasels who say "this is what everybody knows", as if that's some kind of argument. I at least try to back up my views with other methods, you don't even have that.

You seem to have a thing for animals. Normally this would be something you could relate to people over. But considering the meth-smoking gypsy pedo you are, people are afraid that you're abusing your dog.

Please post a picture of them so we know you aren't harming them. I know in buttfuck Croatia you people think it's a sign of manliness to pick on animals, but in the rest of the civilized world (not Croatia) people consider it a sign of being a sicko and a pussy.

So, what is left? You claim that working can help get somebody a partner.

By working it shows that a person has a certain level of responsibility and commitment. Things that you shun because you can't hack it in the real world.

Why would it, if seduction is what you stand for?

I find it hilarious that you think people able to attract others based on their personality and character is some sort of mortal crime. It really just shows you don't have what it takes to be attractive. Don't worry though, I'm sure some methed-up truckers won't care what you look like as long as you swallow.

Because if you don't stand for seduction you stand for arranged marriages or, even more extremely, men automatically getting a wife after earning enough.

Have I ever told you how stupid this makes you sound? Because it does.

Which you don't stand for, right? So what do you stand for? Seduction.

What @Holden is really trying to say here is: Bwaaaaa, i can't get winims because i'm a wretched little troll that likes abusing animals. it's all those others guys fault. Grrr, if only i could maim womins i could get laid. What womens don't like it if you hurt them? LIES. why can't i get laid. (fuck im out of meth).

Which was never ever related to providing anything but stupidity. And this paradox is what proves you are almost certainly wrong about opposing my views

Cite a source on that my little gypsy whore.

 

[Lalala]

What I also love about this citations nonsense is that you also have no citations for your own worldview. There is no research that proves your points either. You're just weasels who say "this is what everybody knows", as if that's some kind of argument. I at least try to back up my views with other methods, you don't even have that.

So, what is left? You claim that working can help get somebody a partner. Why would it, if seduction is what you stand for? Because if you don't stand for seduction you stand for arranged marriages or, even more extremely, men automatically getting a wife after earning enough. Which you don't stand for, right? So what do you stand for? Seduction. Which was never ever related to providing anything but stupidity. And this paradox is what proves you are almost certainly wrong about opposing my views

You are arguing a position in which the thoughts and feelings of women is crucial evidence either for or against your claims, therefore when a 'western woman' offers her opinion, as Macie said, it is evidence and does not need to be cited.
You can argue your own opinion and have it be your own opinions without citation. But when you speak for others, specifically a group that is consistently offering opinions in the contrary to your claims of what their opinions are, you need better evidence.
this is the problem when you start trying to speak for a group you don't belong to, you have no leg to stand on when that group speaks back.