- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
Liberals claim that Solemani was a man of peace!
Here's a snippet:
It's funny how the left will stand up for someone who would otherwise oppose everything they stand for.
Here's a snippet:
The United States is on the edge of a massively disruptive conflict, a full out war of choice that will have been chosen by someone illegally occupying the Oval Office.
There is so much, painfully, to unravel about the attack on Suleimani:
There is so much, painfully, to unravel about the attack on Suleimani:
- Why was the Pentagon (the CJCS) so idiotic to even present this ‘outlandish’ option to Trump, treating Trump with the seriousness and respect that has been given to past Presidents? Trump doesn’t have the intellectual capacity nor personality to get ‘the outlandish option to drive you to choose what we want to do’ tactic that people often use when presenting options to their bosses / superiors. Has #Cult45 become embedded within the Pentagon’s leadership (civilian and uniformed)?
- The United States has now blatantly and openly assassinated a (major) foreign government official in another country.
- Has this given green light to Russia, China, and others in the future?
- How would an Iranian assassination of a US official planning strikes against Iran be any different morally or under international law?
- With the Iraqi Parliament vote to expel US forces for Iraq, the Iranians (and ISIS and ...) look to have secured what they have wanted for many years: the US out of Iraq. Suleimani has won a major victory in his martyrdom.
- Yet again, the U.S. media has shown itself incapable of handling Team Trump disinformation. All the emphasis and discussion of how horrible Suleimani is yet, for example, how much time spent on showing Iraqi opinions about the action on talk shows or how much space given to Suleimani’s role as an intermediary to reduce tensions in the Persian Gulf.
It's funny how the left will stand up for someone who would otherwise oppose everything they stand for.