- Dołączono
- 26 Wrz 2017
WILDCARD BITCHES, YEEE HAAAAAW
But seriously that kind of turnaround from Chupp to suddenly catch that in testimony and go 'wait a goddamn fucking second' would be incredible.
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Twórca wątku 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
But seriously that kind of turnaround from Chupp to suddenly catch that in testimony and go 'wait a goddamn fucking second' would be incredible.
theworstkindofeurofag
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 23 Kwi 2019
If Chupp actually ends up reversing his decisions, I might end up going to church again.
- Dołączono
- 5 Wrz 2019
The best of this is that this shit shows that Lemoine was projecting his fraud onto Ty regarding the affidavits
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
I'm trying to think of an honest explanation but all the possible explanations involve at least some degree of dishonesty and deliberate attempt to deceive the court on a matter material to its decision, i.e. fraud on the court.
The redaction only makes it worse. Why redact an otherwise completely innocuous and nonprivileged item like deposition preparation? It only makes sense if they remembered that their clients committed perjury about that very event.
- Dołączono
- 5 Sie 2019
Lemoine couldn't even kill a mosquito, what makes anyone think he's capable of hustling a grift without being caught?
- Dołączono
- 21 Mar 2019
That's what I was thinking. Not re: honest explanation, since I obviously wouldn't know, but the redaction. If it were at least unredacted then they could claim they had been negligent during deposition and missed when their clients lied, at least shunting some of the responsibility off onto their clients, but deliberately hiding it means they know it's a lie - either their billing or the deposition answers - and did nothing about it.
It seems like they could have just avoided it by not billing it, but I suspect they expected Chupp to do what everyone was predicting and look at none of it, then wave it through.
Crabbo
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 10 Lis 2018
Im staggered that Nick may have been right on the money again.
Chupps incompetence and constant adherence to how a prior case went would follow suit with his laziness and a lack of knowledge about these preceding's.
I just cant wait to see what got Chupps head perked up, and has him digging into past record to compare.
Hoping for Chupp to have his own redemption arc!
Chupps incompetence and constant adherence to how a prior case went would follow suit with his laziness and a lack of knowledge about these preceding's.
I just cant wait to see what got Chupps head perked up, and has him digging into past record to compare.
Hoping for Chupp to have his own redemption arc!
- Dołączono
- 5 Kwi 2019
While it would be awesome if Chupp "saw the light"(read the goddamn papers), we have to keep in mind that the appeals court will have the ultimate say. And there is a huge disadvantage in that.
The appellate judges have never met Vic, but more importantly, have never met the Fuhrer. Lets hope that human element doesn't interfere too badly.
The appellate judges have never met Vic, but more importantly, have never met the Fuhrer. Lets hope that human element doesn't interfere too badly.
LuNaS
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 23 Kwi 2019
Ok, while I don't think this will result in a backpedaling by Chupp about his rulings... Dear heavens I would probably laugh myself into an injury if that happened, if it happened indirectly because JSL wanted to depose Vic... Oh my...
Rate me hopeful as much as you want, if Chupp actually backpedaled his rulings the chimp outs would be a thing of legend.
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
I don't see that happening, but the billing issues are more than minor and those are probably what he is addressing. I wouldn't get overly optimistic. Still, if Chupp generates a good, solid record for the appeals court to look at, even if he does just greenlight all their bills, that's a better outcome than we were expecting.
They may also have been led to believe by Ty's generally affable willingness to get along that he was some dumb rube they could just away with murder against. Their arrogance and overconfidence may very well come back to bite them on the ass.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 6 Maj 2019
Don't quote me on it, but I think you need to slot those people in beforehand. It simply... wasn't a reason to in a timely manner.
- Dołączono
- 10 Lis 2015
How the hell does that work? I need more details.
So whats the remedy for something like this based on the 3 options Allanon listed?
Another question. Is it significant that MoRon lied about their depo prep or who was paying for thier lawyers? I mean obviously its lying under oath but how does lying about those things specifically hurt Vic?
- Dołączono
- 8 Maj 2019
Plus they had already gone for 4 hours with those that were already going on the stand.
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
Anything from just denying them the questionable billing item to sanctioning them for it, up to and including completely denying their billing or reducing it to a dollar, or even issuing a perjury referral for criminal prosecution to the state. Don't expect much, though.
So ask to slot them in beforehand and ask for more time or another hearing. The worst that happens is the judge says no. If there really is evidence of perjury right there in the defendants' own filings why wouldn't you try to get that in front of the judge? Don't just expect Chupp to figure this out on his own. Tell Vic's lawyers to work for their $500 an hour.
- Dołączono
- 28 Sie 2018
How funny would it be if they got hit with some fraud accusations that were substantiated by the judge? Lemoine and KV have been crowing about how Nick and Ty are grifters/fraudsters with the GFM, but then it's confirmed the only grifters remain on KV side, only this time it's on the record and attorneys are about to get their shit pushed in.
- Dołączono
- 21 Mar 2019
If Chupp changes his tune (not just in a 'flips the ruling' way, but in an attitude way) from now on, this may be what Nick was talking about months ago, where the last thing you want in a TCPA motion (as a defendant) is for the judge to get interested in the case. Chupp was clearly uninterested in the case when the initial hearing hit and wanted it all off his docket, but as of this latest hearing, it's possible he's gotten interested.
That said, my own theory is that if he's paying more attention, he's been doing it since the 'death threats'. Bear with me, but up until that point, Chupp had been pretty lazy about everything. He'd respond to things by not ruling on it, like 'you're not going to file TCPA like that, right?' and 'I probably will look at it, can't see how I wouldn't', 'lol public figure sure, there's lots of people here', and generally seemed lost, confused and uninterested. Then he gets these death threats sent to him by Marchi and he orders an emergency hearing, demands immediate mediation, and appears to realize for the first time there might be some substance to the case.
So here's what I suspect: Chupp didn't read a darn thing up until the death threats. He just relied on the evidence brief handed to him in the hearing. This is why he dismissed all motions to strike, because he didn't want to be bothered with reading them, and he granted all the extensions - he didn't want to bother reading into it. The hearing shows up, he assumes this is some petty, unimportant defamation case where one guy got mad about other people saying things he didn't like. He doesn't do any research into the TCPA before the hearing and so doesn't know the standards for it very well. This is why he agrees with Sam that Jamie's statement would need fact-finding but still dismisses the claim before that - he had no flippin' clue what the statement was before then.
He gets the death threats and pushes them to mediation, still not getting the situation. They don't settle out like he hopes, and he gives a glance over at the TCPA filing. He barely reads it, thus getting Ron's role hilariously wrong, and just shoves it off his docket because it's probably getting appealed and judges who know TCPA better than him can look at the whole thing. From that emergency hearing onward you see he's more alert in transcripts, asks more questions and is more bewildered by the defense. Martinez is credited with being very smooth and efficient, but Chupp also doesn't talk over him and literally tell him to shut up, either.
This all culminates in the billing stuff. So wouldn't it be funny if the defense sending those 'death threats' to him to try to poison the judge against Vic actually was the trigger to get Chupp off of his butt and pay attention to a case he'd written off as 'a slapfight between cartoon people'? Especially if their perjury in the frivolous billing and Lemoine's insane superbill is what finally pushed him into this deeper investigation/possible demand of unredacted billing.
Garm
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 5 Cze 2019
Schizophrenia.
- Dołączono
- 5 Sie 2019
Oh, they'll still spin it.
They'll suddenly hate Chupp or say Vic used his gay pants power to bewitch him.
They are so desperate to be right that they'll entirely disregard the truth.