Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[AnOminous]

Anyway obviously the 70-year-old pillar of the community who got murdered because he took in a degenerate tranny doesn't get any mention, it's just 'tranny genocide', and not 'repressed homosexual former lawyer wants some young ass and ends up getting murdered as a result'

So pretty much a couple of queers decide to spice up their relationship by bringing in some rough trade who turns out rougher than they'd expected.

 

[Clones of Alex Jones]

PORN IDENTITY Police investigating ‘hate crime’ after transgender woman turned down for porn role ‘because she has a penis’

• Phoebe Cooke

• 18 Oct 2019, 11:01
• Updated: 19 Oct 2019, 3:27

COPS are investigating a "hate crime" after a transgender woman was turned down for a porn role "because she has a penis".
Ria Cooper, 25, who became Britain's youngest trans person when she transitioned 10 years ago, says an anonymous photographer messaged her saying he wanted them to have sex on camera and sell the resulting porno.

Spoiler: photos

4
Ria Cooper has accused a photographer of 'transphobic comments'Credit: SWNS:South West News Service

4

Ria Cooper says she's speaking out to help other transgender people suffering abuseCredit: SWNS:South West News Service
But when he found out Ria still has male reproductive organs he immediately retracted the offer.
In messages exchanged over WhatsApp, the photographer claimed he couldn't work with her because "she has a c***".
'TRANSPHOBIC'
Ria has hit out at the "transphobic behaviour" and says she's being unfairly discriminated against in her modelling career.
The woman from Hull, East Yorks., has reported the comments to Humberside Police, which is investigating the incident as a hate crime.
She previously appeared on This Morning, when she discussed how she began transitioning at 15.
Ria, who was assigned male at birth, struggled with how the hormones she was prescribed changed her, and shortly after her 18th birthday decided to live as a man.
The qualified beauty therapist has now transitioned to a woman, and has opened a hair and beauty salon to help other transgender people.
Ria says the man got in touch with her after she released her new glamour modelling portfolio online.
He apparently told her the industry was like a "family" and vowed to help her make her way to the top of it.
Then the photographer told Ria he had just been informed by a friend that she is transgender, before saying "Playboy won't accept that".
He then cut all contact with Ria, who says her social media profiles clearly state she is a "ladyboy".
Ria has described the comments as "discriminatory" and "appalling", comparing the abuse to that of a racist.
She said: "When I first changed I found it really scary and very confusing.


"I had no one to lean on for support it was such a massive change.
"But, now I'm comfortable and confident in my own skin I wanted to help others."
A spokeswoman for Humberside Police said: "We received a report of a hate incident yesterday, on Wednesday, October 16. The report has been logged and will be investigated."

4
Ria shared this picture of herself as a child when she spoke of her journey on This Morning in 2017Credit: ITV/This Morning

Ria Cooper appeared on the This Morning sofa to discuss her decision to transition for the third timeCredit: ITV/This Morning
Transgender woman Ria Cooper slammed by This Morning viewers for 'chewing gum' on show

Police investigating 'hate crime' after transgender woman turned down for porn role 'because she has a penis'

COPS are investigating a “hate crime” after a transgender woman was turned down for a porn role “because she has a penis”. Ria Cooper, 25, who became Britain’s younges…

www.thesun.co.uk

Police investigating 'hate crime' after transgender woman turned down…

archived 20 Oct 2019 09:34:01 UTC

archive.fo

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

You know there’s trans porn, right? There is an entire category, nay, plethoras of sites just for you.

 

[Harnessed Carcass]

You know there’s trans porn, right? There is an entire category, nay, plethoras of sites just for you.

Silence, bigot

 

[Classist.]

This is why we should look after the mentally ill instead of enabling them. The fact that they've been transitioning since 15 says volumes about their childhood and mental health. When did this sort of thing become not just socially acceptable but encouraged, when did tolerance become acceptance?

 

[deodorant]

So I can become a tranny and get free sex and money?

No wonder so many people are hopping on this trend.

 

[soft kitty]

I hate trannies so fucking much. When is this shit going to go away. Why do people insist on feeding into this delusion, it's so fucking backwards. This is the worst timeline. How many transgender people are in Africa or Islamic countries? Zero that's how fucking many, because those people have REAL problems.

 

[queue-anon]

This is why we should look after the mentally ill instead of enabling them. The fact that they've been transitioning since 15 says volumes about their childhood and mental health. When did this sort of thing become not just socially acceptable but encouraged, when did tolerance become acceptance?

He even detransitioned a few years ago, which I think shows that a lot of trannies detransition because they can't decide what they want (it's not a mental illness, guise!), because they want even more attention, and/or because trans is old hat and they want to reinvent themselves yet again.

In the end, I couldn't give less of a shit if these idiots are ruining their lives for bullshit, but they're steamrolling over all the rest of us in the meantime. If only these crazy fucks would leave all the rest of us alone.

 

[pwnest injun]

I hate trannies so fucking much. When is this shit going to go away. Why do people insist on feeding into this delusion, it's so fucking backwards. This is the worst timeline. How many transgender people are in Africa or Islamic countries? Zero that's how fucking many, because those people have REAL problems.

Well, there's a bunch in Iran because it's a work around for killing homosexuals. If a dude gets chopped by the state, he's a lady so he isn't gay anymore doesn't need hanging. Welcome to the future of Moderate Islam.

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole]

One of these things is not like the other.

he wanted them to have sex on camera and sell the resulting porno.
-
she's being unfairly discriminated against in her modelling career.

One of these things just doesn't belong.

"she has a c***"

 

[Gone_Fission]

The only way to end this insanity is for society as a whole to assert that transgenderism isn't even a valid concept at all. Not even cutting slack to transmedicalists or indulging the "muh good based trannies, tho" like the way even some rightoids suck off Blaire White. No transgender is valid, no transition services should be funded by the state or private insurance, and all tranny docs should be sued into oblivion for malpractice and the parents of trans kids should be arrested for child abuse. This shit is societal cancer and we need to go full chemo at this point.

 

[Comrade Autogynephilia]

Neovage cave in is extremely dangerous it turns out....

Penny needs your help with ongoing medical costs, organized by Penny Zimmerman

UPDATE 02/21/2019 i thought we were done. i thought i was finally in … Penny Zimmerman needs your support for Penny needs your help with ongoing medical costs

www.gofundme.com

Start reading from July:



....

It looks like they only wanted $2000 initially but then managed to get $10k, I wonder if they added a few things from the troon doctor's menu towards the end and hence this happening.

BTW I found this on Kyle Burns' twitter just after he'd smugly tweeted this:

 

[AnOminous]

Neovage cave in is extremely dangerous it turns out....

Another dying troon butchered by a quack. They want to do this to 7 year olds.

 

[remiem]

Neovage cave in is extremely dangerous it turns out....

Outside of the classic- play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

You just know whatever is left behind if this troon survives will be more mutilated than ever before because of this. Assuming something ruptured or tore and they start profusely bleeding, they won't be able to risk dilating because it could cause the same thing to happen again. Could have died for a completely voluntary surgery that looks like shit in normal circumstances. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If u don't help this troon pay for their own mistakes ur a bigot!

 

[Silence of the Troons]

It's Time for 'LGB' and 'T' to Go Their Separate Ways - Quillette

The growing rift between increasingly radicalized transgender-rights activists and the lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) communities has finally come out into the open. This week, Europe’s biggest LGBT-rights organization, the London-based Stonewall charity, was publicly accused of subordinating...

quillette.com

It’s Time for ‘LGB’ and ‘T’ to Go Their Separate Ways

The growing rift between increasingly radicalized transgender-rights activists and the lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) communities has finally come out into the open. This week, Europe’s biggest LGBT-rights organization, the London-based Stonewall charity, was publicly accused of subordinating LGB rights to the group’s increasingly single-minded goal of replacing sex with gender as a marker of identity. As Helen Joyce recently wrote in Standpoint, “Stonewall went all in for gender self-ID. Its online glossary now describes biological sex as ‘assigned at birth’ (presumably by a midwife with a Hogwarts-style Sorting Hat). ‘Gay’ and ‘lesbian’ now mean same-gender, not same-sex, attraction. ‘Transphobia’ is the ‘fear or dislike of someone based on the fact that they are trans, including the denial/refusal to accept their gender identity.’ At a stroke, anyone who declares themselves exclusively attracted to people of the same sex has become a bigot.”

As a gay man who lives in the United States, I have no direct stake in Britain’s intra-LGBT politics. (“LGB/T” might now be a more apt term.) But I am surprised that it has taken this long for such a formal breach to occur. The same pressures have been building everywhere, and it was only a matter of time before someone acted on them.

After the U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide in the landmark 2015 decision Obergefell v. Hodges, many believed the fight for gay rights would begin to wind down. Yet that didn’t happen. Instead, the LGBT-advocacy sector simply redirected its available staff, fundraising and rhetoric to other projects. I know this because I saw this happen, both as a university student, gay man and equal-rights advocate.

In a relatively short period of time, the gay-rights movement fused with more radical campus-based gender and identity-politics movements, to become the compound movement now known as “LGBTQ+”—lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, “queer” and more. Even many people within the movement now have trouble keeping up with all the new subcategories contained within that plus sign. One version of the rainbow flag unveiled last year has 11 different colors on it. The creator, Daniel Quasar, identifies as a “queer non-binary demiguy” whose pronouns are “xe/xem/xyr.” None of these bizarre neologisms have any resonance to those of us who joined the gay-rights movement simply to affirm and protect the basic rights of people to be who they are and love who they choose without stigma or legal sanction. We’ve been forced to watch the simple moral logic of non-discrimination be transformed into a self-parodic alphabet soup of invented identities.

Over the last few months, a Democratic presidential debate focused on LGBT issues was highjacked by a rogue transgender woman who shouted slogans about trans rights while the candidates and moderators nodded along robotically. Presidential candidate Joe Biden has called for unisex prisons, a policy that, if implemented, would lead to the rape of female prisoners. Senator Kamala Harris, another Democrat running for president, even came under fire for daring to suggest that pregnancy is a “women’s” issue—since it is now fashionable to highlight the fact that trans men and the “non-binary” also can bear children.

In his recent Netflix special Sticks and Stones, comedian Dave Chappelle nearly got himself canceled for pointing out the growing estrangement between the LGB and trans communities (whom he collectively referred to as “alphabet people”). This being a forbidden topic, it goes without saying that the ultra-woke outlet Vice ran a scathing review of the special, later echoed by other progressive outlets, such as Salon. LGBT activists chided Chappelle for his alleged transphobia on Twitter,despite the fact that viewers themselves gave the show a 99% rating. This is now a typical pattern: Whenever someone runs afoul of gender orthodoxy, the official pundit class has to pretend it’s appalled, a difficult conceit to sustain when sites such as Rotten Tomatoes make popular assessments a matter of public record.

Chappelle used the analogy of a car trip shared by passengers G, L, T and B. The Gs are driving, with the Ls in the passenger seat. The Ts are in the back. “Everyone in the car resents the Ts,” Chappelle says. “The Ts are making the trip take longer.” Trans comedians and activists, who’ve become accustomed to pride of place in the intersectionalist hierarchy, were up in arms. But Chappelle made it abundantly clear that he had no animus toward anyone in the LGBT community: The target of his satire was not any one group, but the increasingly ridiculous conceit that all of these “alphabet people” are happy fellow travelers. LGB rights and T activism have been revealed to be unnatural bedfellows, and it’s inevitable that, as is happening in Britain, they will go their separate ways.

Gays, lesbians and bisexuals all have something obvious in common: same-sex attraction. This is an alternative sexual orientation that, to some extent at least, shapes our experiences and alters our life outcomes. We typically identify with our biological sex—and in fact, sometimes have spent many years feeling trapped by it. To be gay is to understand that sex is set at birth. My sexual attraction, likewise, is based on hard-wired factors beyond my control.

Transgenderism is a separate concept. While homosexuality leads to obvious differences in real-life behavior, transgenderism offers a categorial redefinition of what it means to be a man or a woman. As Joyce describes it, a “gender identity” is a quasi-spiritual concept—almost like a soul—that is “something between an internal essence, knowable only to its possessor, and stereotypically masculine or feminine appearance and behavior.”

Gay rights activists simply want society to accept their different ways of living and loving—since gay men and lesbians pursue romantic interests and build families in ways that are at odds with conventional heterosexual expectations. Followers of radical gender theory, on the other hand, demand that we all reject our basic understanding of biological sex in favor of a recently conceptualized abstract notion of human identity.

Of course, the idea of transgenderism per se isn’t new—nor is the (perfectly valid and just) demand that people with gender dysphoria be treated with decency and respect. But the original form of this demand was based on the far more reasonable idea that gender is a social construct distinct from biological sex. It was not disputed that a transgender woman is a biologically male human who identifies with the social norms traditionally associated with woman. But in recent years, transgender activists have demanded that sex and gender be conflated, and that the very idea of innate biological differences be pushed into the background. At the most absurd extreme, there are now athletes and scholars who seriously suggest that being male offers no competitive physical advantages over being female, a proposition that even small children know to be unhinged.

One of the unsettling elements embedded within this advocacy is the demand that women—lesbians, more specifically—make themselves sexually available to trans women, on the far-fetched theory that gender identity, not sex, is the real source of human attraction. As Jonathan Best notes, Stonewall now has defined“homosexuality” as referring to “someone who has an emotional romantic and/or sexual orientation towards someone of the same gender.”

“Did you see what happened there?” Best writes. “Same-sex attraction has become same-gender attraction. This might seem academic. But take a moment to reflect on what it means in the context of Stonewall’s affirmation of gender identity. Stonewall is asserting that lesbians are attracted to anyone with a female gender identity, whether that person is biologically male or female. This turns gay and lesbian desire into transphobia. I’m a gay man—I’m attracted to male bodies—not people performing male gender roles. And, yes, that means I like male genitalia. (I really like it). Trans activists argue that my sex-focused homosexuality is transphobic. I’ve seen trans activists compare non-trans inclusive gay desire to racism and describe gay sexuality as ‘genital hang-ups.’”

In the United States, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives has passed the Equality Act, a so-called LGBT rights bill that outlaws discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. That is a noble goal that would seem to be in keeping with America’s larger civil-rights legacy. But the Act explicitly redefines biological sex under federal law according to self-defined gender identity—so it easily could allow for a whole host of adverse consequences. And as we have seen in Canada, where a trans woman tried to leverage human-rights law to force immigrant aestheticians to wax her “female” scrotum and penis, the victims of this movement tend to be women.

Even under current U.S. law, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act serves to outlaw discrimination on the basis of “race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” Activists are arguing that transgender identity is protected under the law’s reference to “sex,” even though “gender identity” is mentioned nowhere in the law. Trans activists also are demanding government support for policies that subject gender-confused children to potentially sterilizing hormones and other aggressive therapies. Their rights are being sacrificed on the altar of gender self-identification as well.

The redefinition of sex as gender is a step that most people—even the most well-meaning and humane members of society—simply will never accept, no matter what laws activists manage to get passed. And the effort to ram this doctrine down the throats of ordinary people will tarnish any movement that insists on such mantras. So long as self-described “LGBT” activists demand that a male with gender dysphoria is “really” a female, many otherwise accepting people will remain opposed to, or at least skeptical of, the wider movement.

As a right-of-center journalist, I know dozens of young conservatives, particularly women, who are completely open and accepting of their gay and lesbian friends, and supportive of gay rights; but simply won’t accept that a man can be a woman, even if they are forced to give lip service to this mantra as a condition of passing sensitivity-training courses or using social media. Many progressive news outlets were aghast when new polling showed that “young people are growing less tolerant of LGBTQ individuals.” But a closer look into the survey’s methodology revealed that on most questions, they were asked about “LGBTQ people,” not gay people. Support for “equal rights” remained steady, but comfort around “LGBTQ” people has declined. Notably, the survey found that comfort levels around “a same-sex couple holding hands” remain virtually unchanged. Although it’s fashionable to pretend otherwise, it’s the T that’s the issue.

To repeat what I wrote above, transgender people deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. And I have spoken out strongly against anti-trans policies (such as a ban on trans soldiers in the U.S. military). To say that these two causes—LGB and T—should separate isn’t to say that one has value and the other does not. I am simply noting that their goals are at odds. As gay writer Andrew Sullivan recently wrote in New York magazine:

The truth is that many lesbians and gay men are quite attached to the concept of sex as a natural, biological, material thing. And gay men are defined by our attraction to our own biological sex. We are men and attracted to other men. If the concept of a man is deconstructed, so that someone without a penis is a man, then homosexuality itself is deconstructed. Transgender people pose no threat to us, and the vast majority of gay men and lesbians wholeheartedly support protections for transgender people. But transgenderist ideology — including postmodern conceptions of sex and gender — is indeed a threat to homosexuality, because it is a threat to biological sex as a concept.

Canadian writer Sky Gilbert, a gay writer, made a similar point in Quillette, noting that transgender activists increasingly are telling young children who may grow up to be gay or lesbian that their effeminate or butch expression is actually a sign of a transgender soul trapped in the wrong body: “Until the latter decades of the twentieth century, if parents caught their son playing with dolls, they might suspect he was gay. And if he grew up to be an adult with same-sex desire, he would go to a psychiatrist to seek help. Now that we have (spuriously) separated sexuality from gender, a parent who catches his boy playing with dolls will take a trip to a psychiatrist—but this time for different reasons: Little he might be a little she.”

The idea of biological sex is at the core to the gay identity—of my gay identity—and the stereotypical definitions of gender expression that the transgender movement peddles ignores the existence of men and women who happen to express their gender in unorthodox ways without actually being transgender. Most of these people simply grow up to be gay. To demand that these children be instead labeled gender dysphoric is essentially a form of woke conversion therapy. We gays experienced quite enough of that phobic behavior from the socially conservative right. We have no interest in getting force-fed another serving from the progressive left.

 

[Thank Fuck For Evil Otto]

It's Time for 'LGB' and 'T' to Go Their Separate Ways - Quillette

The growing rift between increasingly radicalized transgender-rights activists and the lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) communities has finally come out into the open. This week, Europe’s biggest LGBT-rights organization, the London-based Stonewall charity, was publicly accused of subordinating...

quillette.com

"We need to wall off our slippery slope somewhere between G and P."

 

[Zeebie]

Outside of the classic- play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

You just know whatever is left behind if this troon survives will be more mutilated than ever before because of this. Assuming something ruptured or tore and they start profusely bleeding, they won't be able to risk dilating because it could cause the same thing to happen again. Could have died for a completely voluntary surgery that looks like shit in normal circumstances. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Wyświetl załącznik 986528

If u don't help this troon pay for their own mistakes ur a bigot!

Ikr? Every payday I should think about all the deluded grifters on the internet who want my money.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

"Gendered Intelligence" more like "Gendered Stupidity" https://twitter.com/fairplaywomen/status/1188371835689295873

Transgender women should be allowed to compete in female-only sports

• Trans women must have tests to prove they are taking hormone-blocking drugs
• This could stop after pressure from trans lobby group Gendered Intelligence
• Controversy comes as male-born trans athletes dominate some women's sport

Transgender women who were born male should be allowed to compete in female-only sports events without medical checks, according to a group receiving taxpayers' money to run training sessions for national sporting bodies.

Sport England, a quango that oversees grassroots sport, has paid £26,000 to controversial trans lobby group Gendered Intelligence to deliver the sessions to sports associations.

Critics last night accused Sport England of introducing new gender policies through Gendered Intelligence. It is due to clarify its official guidance on trans women later this year.

The controversy comes as male-born trans athletes dominate some women's sport, including Canadian cyclist Rachel McKinnon, who won a second world title in Manchester last weekend.

One training document produced by Gendered Intelligence – and seen by The Mail on Sunday – urges sporting bodies to 'challenge' the idea that trans women who were born male have an 'unfair advantage' when they compete against biological women.

At present, trans women must undergo tests to prove they have been taking hormone-blocking drugs to reduce their testosterone levels before competing in women's sport.

But the document, entitled 'A Social Inclusion Model for Trans People in Sport', asks: 'Why are we worrying about what medical intervention they may or may not have had? They are a woman, within women's parameters.'

Gendered Intelligence has previously been criticised for running trans-awareness school workshops for pupils aged as young as four.

Dr Nicola Williams, from the women's rights pressure group Fair Play For Women, said: 'Sport England has not yet finalised its guidance on transgender inclusion but is already sneaking it out.'

Gendered Intelligence, which registered as a charity earlier this year, claims to have delivered trans training sessions to more than 16,000 people.

Its sport seminars, which have been running since April, claim there is an 'irrational fear' of biological males pretending to be trans women to cheat in sport.

It adds that sports need to move from an 'exclusive' model where trans athletes have to provide medical evidence before competing in their chosen gender category to an 'inclusive' model that 'assumes everyone can play unless there is a clear, objective reason for them to be excluded'.

Cathy Devine, a specialist in sport policy for women, said the advice delivered by Gendered Intelligence may be in breach of the law.

She said: 'The Equality Act says that people with the protected characteristic of "gender reassignment" can be excluded from female sport categories for the purposes of fairness and safety.'

A number of athletes have expressed concerns about the inclusion of trans women athletes, arguing it is unfair to other competitors.

British cyclist Victoria Hood said: 'The science is clear and it's obvious to anyone that trans women have an advantage over women.

'All of the governing bodies are terrified of a small, aggressive group of people. For taxpayers to be paying for these training sessions is ludicrous.'

A spokesman for Sport England said: 'Sport England is committed to ensuring that everyone can benefit from the benefits that leading an active life can offer. That's why we have been working with Gendered Intelligence since April to support the sector to be better equipped to include trans people.'

Gendered Intelligence said: 'The training we have delivered will allow more trans and non-binary people to access grassroots sports and fitness.'

 

[Spastic Colon]

"Gendered Intelligence" more like "Gendered Stupidity" https://twitter.com/fairplaywomen/status/1188371835689295873
Wyświetl załącznik 987318

In other words, now that word has gotten out that SRS is a nightmare, so now they just want to wear dresses and be called women even if they don't do anything else. WTF? Like, seriously, WTF?

So, they claim that they are not cheating and that there are no advantages and yet instead of reassuring people with science and testing -- they declare that we just have to take their word for it. They are admitting that they can't prove it and fuck cis people, you're all transphobes for asking them for proof.

What are those "women parameters" they speak of? Because XX and vagina top the list for me. Dresses, makeup, purple hair, 90's plastic choker, and pre-teen bedroom decorations do not a woman make.

 

[Nykysnottrans]

New Gigi Gorgeous video on hairline surgery:

This is a promo video that Gigi Gorgeous shot for the surgeon who performed the procedure. Since this is a surgery that doesn't get talked about here I thought I'd post it. For me it's a typical example of polysurgery, ie. someone getting more procedures on top of the initial ones, not to fix the initial problem but rather getting more stuff done to fix the damage (leftover scars) caused by the original surgery. A typical example of how a "solution" only ends up causing additional problems. (And no, I do not think covering up visible scars has anything to do with gender dysphoria.)