TCPA Hearing 9/6/19 - Marchi ran from the Law, TI crumbles, conspiracy still on the table, and collective autism from all sides.

[Sheryl Nome]

It doesn't make sense to allow one party to engage in dilatory motion practice while flat out refusing to provide discovery, and then file a TCPA.

It does seem that if a defendant begins to conduct discovery, they shouldn't be able to file a TCPA, as they at least have demonstrated that they believe the lawsuit to meritorious by engaging in discovery themselves. :^)

 

[Ivan Shatov]

Damn you could be charged with murder for that post.
Absolute destruction.

One thing about law twitter: it's not hard to identify the name and physical location of the majority of the shittalkers.

@Dumb Bitch Smoothie, you know me well enough to know I'm not one for pozloading my neghole. But I do have to wonder what happens when someone puts together a detailed map with an estimate of billable hours burned by these rejects. Like, when a legal reporter gets wind of the fact members of prestigious law firms like to argue online about their horse-toothed waifu all throughout the day.

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

One thing about law twitter: it's not hard to identify the name and physical location of the majority of the shittalkers.

@Dumb Bitch Smoothie, you know me well enough to know I'm not one for pozloading my neghole. But I do have to wonder what happens when someone puts together a detailed map with an estimate of billable hours burned by these rejects. Like, when a legal reporter gets wind of the fact members of prestigious law firms like to argue online about their horse-toothed waifu all throughout the day.

They would absolutely lose their minds if their online activities were leaked. They can talk about how much of better lawyers they supposedly are but I don't know a single person outside of their circlejerk who feels that their behavior is acceptable.

So really, it's less of an if and more of a when this comes to light in their professional lives. They're touching their own poo. Just like they're dumb enough to confirm the details of their doxx and furthermore assume that they can sue over that information being shared. If they're such super lawyers they should know better.

But it'll happen. Their five minutes of internet fame won't mean shit once all of this is over and they can't get work.

 

[TJ-Weber]

One thing about law twitter: it's not hard to identify the name and physical location of the majority of the shittalkers.

@Dumb Bitch Smoothie, you know me well enough to know I'm not one for pozloading my neghole. But I do have to wonder what happens when someone puts together a detailed map with an estimate of billable hours burned by these rejects. Like, when a legal reporter gets wind of the fact members of prestigious law firms like to argue online about their horse-toothed waifu all throughout the day.

Goddamn man, you coming in with the fire.

 

[Jamestyalor4312]

Unpopular opinion: I do not have high hopes for Vic now. IMO Beard made a few major mistakes. Let me elaborate.

1. Why not contact conventions and get a affidavit or at least a notarized statement of why they cancelled Vic. The Judge has been body slamming prima facie like he's the undertaker and prima is Rey Mysterio. If any of the I can't remember but it was 13-18 conventions that cancelled him said "yes we were influenced by funi and or monica/jamie/rons tweets or funimations decision". That would prove defamation there. Would not win the case alone but would be a good start.

2. Improperly submitted affidavits. Nuff said, that was some seriously eye rolling shit.

3. This kinda goes along with #1 but it wouldn't of hurt to get a affidavit/statement from Rooster Teeth. As far as I know they didn't do an investigation they just piggy backed off of allegations alone no investigation at all. So if certain VA's tweets were part of that decision, yada yada yada.

Even as a ISWV supporter, on the youtube videos he was like "We don't have to prove anything, prima facie, blah blah". It just made me roll my eyes. He has been more than well paid for this case, I like Ty but I just don't think he put in his A game here and no one should be butthurt about that.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

More Dumb shit

Oh my fucking god you are so fucking stupid.

"Just get an affadavit." Its not that simple. He cannot force them to give him a statement, and its in their legal interest NOT to give Ty statements because he could potentially sue them for Breach of contract. He also can't just GET a statement or Affadavit from Rooster Teeth. Seriously how do you think he can do that? He cannot compel them with the discovery stay and they are hostile for good reason.
The one convention that actually did provide one, Kamehacon, was apparently not good enough according to Chupp, in complete contravention of case law, the reasons why one can only fucking wonder

As for the affidavits, it didn't fucking matter to the judge so I have no idea why anyone cares anymore.

Why did you even post if you know this little. You could have read one of any number of threads to get this information and instead you post and make yourself look like a dumbass

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Why did you even post if you know this little.

Practicing to be a twitter lawyer.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Practicing to be a twitter lawyer.

Even a twitter lawyer isn't dumb enough to suggest Ty just get an affadavit from a hostile party while a discovery stay is in place.

 

[Calm]

Unpopular opinion: I do not have high hopes for Vic now. IMO Beard made a few major mistakes. Let me elaborate.

1. Why not contact conventions and get a affidavit or at least a notarized statement of why they cancelled Vic. The Judge has been body slamming prima facie like he's the undertaker and prima is Rey Mysterio. If any of the I can't remember but it was 13-18 conventions that cancelled him said "yes we were influenced by funi and or monica/jamie/rons tweets or funimations decision". That would prove defamation there. Would not win the case alone but would be a good start.

2. Improperly submitted affidavits. Nuff said, that was some seriously eye rolling shit.

3. This kinda goes along with #1 but it wouldn't of hurt to get a affidavit/statement from Rooster Teeth. As far as I know they didn't do an investigation they just piggy backed off of allegations alone no investigation at all. So if certain VA's tweets were part of that decision, yada yada yada.

Even as a ISWV supporter, on the youtube videos he was like "We don't have to prove anything, prima facie, blah blah". It just made me roll my eyes. He has been more than well paid for this case, I like Ty but I just don't think he put in his A game here and no one should be butthurt about that.

1. That's what the discovery period was for, but it was blocked by the defendants for obvious reasons (why incriminate yourself?). The whole purpose of the TCPA was to open up discovery and build a case off of the public evidence already in play.

2. The judge didn't even care about the improperly submitted affidavits and he didn't give a single hoot about them being improperly notarized. He took issue with the fact that Ty tried to resubmit an amended document at the last minute like an amateur and that his mind was already set on how the proceedings would go.

3. Why the fuck would Rooster Teeth give an affidavit or statement at this point in time? They're doing the smart thing by staying out of it to avoid incriminating themselves -as they'll only be a part of the case if they're forcibly dragged into it.

 

[Jamestyalor4312]

Mad at internet

He did not even attempt besides the one and the one he attempted he got. Very curious. Yes dumbshit I know it's not required but he didn't even fucking try. Enough of them confirming they were influenced by tweets and/or Funis decision would of made a difference.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

He did not even attempt besides the one and the one he attempted he got. Very curious. Yes dumbshit I know it's not required but he didn't even fucking try. Enough of them confirming they were influenced by tweets and/or Funis decision would of made a difference.

How do you know he didn't try. Please, impart to me this wisdom. I desire to know. He may have reached out to cons, he may not have, it doesn't actually matter because none of them HAVE to give him an Affadavit, and they would be wise to not give Ty an affadavit.

You don't need an Affadavit to pass the TCPA on something like this anyways, thats well well beyond the standards needed.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

He did not even attempt besides the one and the one he attempted he got. Very curious. Yes dumbshit I know it's not required but he didn't even fucking try. Enough of them confirming they were influenced by tweets and/or Funis decision would of made a difference.

No he didn't Try because that would be hours he had to spend contacting them to do it and getting told to go fuck himself.

 

[Jamestyalor4312]

How do you know he didn't try. Please, impart to me this wisdom. I desire to know. He may have reached out to cons, he may not have, it doesn't actually matter because none of them HAVE to give him an Affadavit, and they would be wise to not give Ty an affadavit.

You don't need an Affadavit to pass the TCPA on something like this anyways, thats well well beyond the standards needed.

He didn't try because in multiple videos he was asked by superchat if he was gonna contact x con or this x con and he said no he didn't need to completely relying on prima facie. He literally said probably more then ten times on videos he wasn't going to seek any more proof that statements were false, affidavits, anything because he didn't need to.

All I said is evidence helps a case, a 7 year old watching law and order knows that.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

He didn't try because in multiple videos he was asked by superchat if he was gonna contact x con or this x con and he said no he didn't need to completely relying on prima facie. He literally said probably more then ten times on videos he wasn't going to seek any more proof that statements were false, affidavits, anything because he didn't need to.

All I said is evidence helps a case, a 7 year old watching law and order knows that.

Great. He didn't need to.
He's right about that, as a matter of law he's right

And as a matter of being an ethical lawyer, he's also right, BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T WASTE YOUR CLIENT'S MONEY RACKING UP BILLABLE HOURS ON A WILD GOOSE CHASE.

Seriously, the probability of a con willingly giving an affadavit to Ty that literally says 'Yeah we broke contract' opens them up to direct legal liability of being sued by Ty and losing, hardcore. Why the fuck would anyone ever do that?

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

relying on prima facie

Yes the thing that he actually had to prove, it isn't his fault the Judge was a dumb fuck, why contact these people when you can't subpoena them when they tell you to get fucked, it would be a waste of the Go Fund me Cash.

 

[Jamestyalor4312]

Great. He didn't need to.
He's right about that, as a matter of law he's right

And as a matter of being an ethical lawyer, he's also right, BECAUSE YOU SHOULDN'T WASTE YOUR CLIENT'S MONEY RACKING UP BILLABLE HOURS ON A WILD GOOSE CHASE.

Welp the judge disagreed so, yeah. He's been repeatedly asked for more proof basically across the entire fucking board on his claims. So even if 90% of the time it would of been a goose chase the 10% of new evidence would of been great but whatever.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Welp the judge disagreed so, yeah. He's been repeatedly asked for more proof basically across the entire fucking board on his claims. So even if 90% of the time it would of been a goose chase the 10% of new evidence would of been great but whatever.

Have you considered, that the Judge was wrong? Given that he just got slapped down by an appellate court earlier that week? That is one of the points of appeals, because Judges can be fuckwits.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Welp the judge disagreed so, yeah. He's been repeatedly asked for more proof basically across the entire fucking board on his claims. So even if 90% of the time it would of been a goose chase the 10% of new evidence would of been great but whatever.

If the Judge applied an erroneous standard of evidence, thats the Judge's fault and why appeals exist.

You're assuming Ty would have gotten any new evidence, but fail to provide any reasoning why a party who could themselves be sued by Ty would provide an affadavit of their own free will.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Even a twitter lawyer isn't dumb enough to suggest Ty just get an affadavit from a hostile party while a discovery stay is in place.

You give them too much credit.

He took issue with the fact that Ty tried to resubmit an amended document at the last minute like an amateur and that his mind was already set on how the proceedings would go.

I'd blame Ty for that wholly, but then Chupp proceeded not to even rule on whether the second amended affidavit would be allowed-- not that there wouldn't be grounds for it to be allowed, apparently.

Welp the judge disagreed so, yeah.

The judge is a dork who couldn't even be bothered to definitively decide on whether to allow exhibits before allowing parties to run their mouths in reference to them for the entire hearing, in addition to completely nonsense adjudications like needing to demonstrate more than one instance of TI in order to get TI past the gate because apparently someone committing TI once doesn't open the gate for rationally inferring that they committed it multiple times.

 

[Allanon]

Unpopular opinion: I do not have high hopes for Vic now. IMO Beard made a few major mistakes. Let me elaborate.

1. Why not contact conventions and get a affidavit or at least a notarized statement of why they cancelled Vic. The Judge has been body slamming prima facie like he's the undertaker and prima is Rey Mysterio. If any of the I can't remember but it was 13-18 conventions that cancelled him said "yes we were influenced by funi and or monica/jamie/rons tweets or funimations decision". That would prove defamation there. Would not win the case alone but would be a good start.

2. Improperly submitted affidavits. Nuff said, that was some seriously eye rolling shit.

3. This kinda goes along with #1 but it wouldn't of hurt to get a affidavit/statement from Rooster Teeth. As far as I know they didn't do an investigation they just piggy backed off of allegations alone no investigation at all. So if certain VA's tweets were part of that decision, yada yada yada.

Even as a ISWV supporter, on the youtube videos he was like "We don't have to prove anything, prima facie, blah blah". It just made me roll my eyes. He has been more than well paid for this case, I like Ty but I just don't think he put in his A game here and no one should be butthurt about that.

1- You can't just 'get' an affidavit. The person you're contacting has to be WILLING to give one, and they have to be willing to say what you want them to say. If you want to compel information, that's for discovery. Which they couldn't execute because of discovery stay. As we can see from people like Stan and EriMin, Ty was very active in reaching out for information from people, so to assume that he didn't contact cons for affidavits is stupid. KC has always been the most sympathetic of the cons, as it's the only one that invited him back (with severe, damaging restrictions)

2- No one cares. Especially Chupp. The judge only had an issue with the amended petition, which he shouldn't have had, because it wasn't a trial. He just treated it like one because he had no idea what he was doing.

3- RT has the same answer as #1. The only way to get info from them is via discovery, which was stayed. RT is also not necessary for a prima facie case against the current defendants.

You're not an ISVW supporter, don't bother to pretend. You just repeated all of KV's stupid talking points about the hearing. Even a casual and barely informed person should know at this point what a prima facie case is, and dismissing it as 'blah blah' is ridiculously disingenuous.