I personally see it a bit differently. The bylaw infractions (window tint for example), and even the noise issues (Miriam screaming outside), are all issues that should be dealt with exclusively at the strata council level. The Strata Property Act is very specific about how these issues are handled, and if an owner violates a bylaw, the remedy to resolve these is set out in the act by way of fines. They can be refined every seven days (and fines are maxed at 200/occurrence). So the strata should be enforcing ALL bylaw violations (being careful not to single out just one occupant, but deal with every complaint from every owner with the same heavy hand). Luckily for MOST owners, it's pretty easy not to be an absolute fuck and live peacefully without having to worry about your neighbours ratting on you for this/that. A lawyer goes beyond, and really I don't believe has any power to enforce a bylaw, or deal with a nuisance owner for example. There is a tribunal for this (when issues escalate in a strata corp.).
I think a lawyer is best served by a single individual facing a threat from another individual (perhaps?), but the strata itself has no power to act as a shield between one owner and another (or even between one owner and the remainder of the owners), with respect to death threats. In my opinion.
Basically, there are strata issues (bylaw infractions), and there are legal issues (death threats for example), and I personally don't see a grey area where they overlap. They are each handled by their respective systems.