TERFs freak out over Jonathan Yaniv - featuring /r/gendercritical

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku NP 901
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
lol oops.

In that case @annoyingfuck disregard everything I said above and say whatever you like here and tell anyone who complains to go fuck themself.

@annoyingfuck is correct but it needs to be tied to Yaniv.

The original r/gc thread naming Yaniv 11/16 was the subject of intense mod consternation. One mod was very much in favor of it and the others weren't because they feared their sub would be banned by Reddit itself. The user was instead banned by Reddit despite adhering to the site-admin rules passed down by this mod who ended up agreeing with shadowbanning Yaniv content around April, probably to keep the sub in the cucked atmosphere that is Reddit, and maybe because she got bored.

I know they resurrected Yaniv after pub ban got lifted, but it wasn't an especially popular thread.
 
Like the other day, some crazy old harpy aired the theory, that the reason that young men are attracted to anarchism, is because then the strongest male can take whatever woman he wants, and can beat wives without police or authorities intervening.

That's dumb as shit.

Everyone knows you need to form a highly mobile and well-armed rape gang, and then distribute the female chattel fairly between you. "Strongest male" isn't shit when you catch him in a crossfire.
 
Yup...
As entertaining as r/GC is and as sensible as some of them are, it’s also filled with an undercurrent of kooky old Lesbians, who view everything through the lense of: “all men hate women, and think about harming and oppressing them 24/7”.
Like the other day, some crazy old harpy aired the theory, that the reason that young men are attracted to anarchism, is because then the strongest male can take whatever woman he wants, and can beat wives without police or authorities intervening.
Saaay whaaaat?‽

Not even old kooky, there is an absolutely shit show of a thread going on at present done by a chick, who says she's married to a man, that thinks all women hate PIV and anyone that says otherwise is delusional, because corkers like these:
'single most dangerous act a woman can engage in',
'And they will beat you or impregnate you and leave you or kill you if you deny them what they think defines them, their essence. It goes like this: penis is man, PIV is man's entire purpose, hence: deny him penetration for whatever reason and you are denying his very selfhood.'
'I don't think many of you are honest. And I'm not blaming you. Safe PIV is much better than rape.'

There is lots more but fuck me, she's delusional and has huge issues that she's projecting onto anyone that isn't a man hater!

Tying it back to Yaniv, he's just a representation of all men and the power they have over women. The Yaniv posts are fairly rational a lot of the time because he's a representation of what is wrong with the world at present and what it means for a women as a whole.
The problem is when those same rationals are used against men that aren't pedo arseholes, then it all becomes an shit show in a teacup.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Tying it back to Yaniv, he's just a representation of all men and the power they have over women. The Yaniv posts are fairly rational a lot of the time because he's a representation of what is wrong with the world at present and what it means for a women as a whole.
The problem is when those same rationals are used against men that aren't pedo arseholes, then it all becomes an shit show in a teacup.

I agree with you but doubleposting is definitely frowned upon here. Consider consolidating your post before a janitor gets aggravated at having to do this for you.
 
Not even old kooky, there is an absolutely shit show of a thread going on at present done by a chick, who says she's married to a man, that thinks all women hate PIV and anyone that says otherwise is delusional, because corkers like these:
'single most dangerous act a woman can engage in',
'And they will beat you or impregnate you and leave you or kill you if you deny them what they think defines them, their essence. It goes like this: penis is man, PIV is man's entire purpose, hence: deny him penetration for whatever reason and you are denying his very selfhood.'
'I don't think many of you are honest. And I'm not blaming you. Safe PIV is much better than rape.'

There is lots more but fuck me, she's delusional and has huge issues that she's projecting onto anyone that isn't a man hater!
This is literally exactly how they get to the "lesbians are privileged" position. PIV is rape so "having to date men" is inherently dangerous therefore lesbians are privileged because they never get PIV raped by men. I keep putting "have to" in scare quotes because they will lose thier shit if you start suggesting maybe they just like, don't date or stay single if it's so fucking awful. But they HAAAAVE TOOOOO don't you understand sexuality? Gawd.
 
Not even old kooky, there is an absolutely shit show of a thread going on at present done by a chick, who says she's married to a man, that thinks all women hate PIV and anyone that says otherwise is delusional, because corkers like these:
'single most dangerous act a woman can engage in',
'And they will beat you or impregnate you and leave you or kill you if you deny them what they think defines them, their essence. It goes like this: penis is man, PIV is man's entire purpose, hence: deny him penetration for whatever reason and you are denying his very selfhood.'
'I don't think many of you are honest. And I'm not blaming you. Safe PIV is much better than rape.'

There is lots more but fuck me, she's delusional and has huge issues that she's projecting onto anyone that isn't a man hater!

Is that the thread where she goes on forever about how awesome, anti-porn, kind and soft spoken her husband is...

And then writes: “I’m perfectly aware that at any moment he can go watch violent pornography, beat me, rape me and dominate me because of the physical difference and because he’s a man blah blah blah... It’s not a good feeling.”

Like WTF woman?! Who on earth thinks like that?

The physical difference between men and women is something they constantly bring up as a reason as to why men are dangerous. So? Just get a gun then! The great equalizer and all that.

Some of these harpies seem to spend 90% of their time obsessing over men.

And they seem convinced that men do the same, constantly thinking up ways to harm women and take pleasure from that. As if there wasn’t a dozen thing men might spend their time on, or consider more important than women: Jobs, hobbies, friends, whatever.

It’s like they come from another planet, or something, and don’t understand how men, or people really, think.

I suspect the problem is caused by brain damage due to excessive exposure to Marxism at an early age, though.
 
Is that the thread where she goes on forever about how awesome, anti-porn, kind and soft spoken her husband is...

And then writes: “I’m perfectly aware that at any moment he can go watch violent pornography, beat me, rape me and dominate me because of the physical difference and because he’s a man blah blah blah... It’s not a good feeling.”

Like WTF woman?! Who on earth thinks like that?

The physical difference between men and women is something they constantly bring up as a reason as to why men are dangerous. So? Just get a gun then! The great equalizer and all that.

Some of these harpies seem to spend 90% of their time obsessing over men.

And they seem convinced that men do the same, constantly thinking up ways to harm women and take pleasure from that. As if there wasn’t a dozen thing men might spend their time on, or consider more important than women: Jobs, hobbies, friends, whatever.

It’s like they come from another planet, or something, and don’t understand how men, or people really, think.

I suspect the problem is caused by brain damage due to excessive exposure to Marxism at an early age, though.

This would be technically true of my SO though. He's literally twice as large and strong. If I ever thought he'd be violent toward me he'd be outta here. Don't have relationships w/ppl you're uncomfortable with. FFS.
 
This would be technically true of my SO though. He's literally twice as large and strong. If I ever thought he'd be violent toward me he'd be outta here. Don't have relationships w/ppl you're uncomfortable with. FFS.

In her case (and in yours I guess) it more like: “There’s a theoretical possibility it may happen”, which is a totally useless thing to worry about.

There’s also the same theoretical possibility that the smaller wife may buy a gun and shoot her bigger husband, or knife him while he’s asleep.

To get back to the topic of Yaniv, the TERFs (I assume everyone here uses that expression in a descriptive way and not as a slur. I like it because it’s a handy abbreviation.) think of him as the prototypical trans woman: A perverted autogynophile, who has being a woman (and tampons) as a fetish.

Where I think they’re slightly off the mark, is when they ascribe some intention of violence on Yaniv, or speculate that he has violent thoughts about women. Or even to a lesser degree that he hates women.

(But then again, every man is according to them driven by hate against women and dream of being violent towards them.)

Sure, Yaniv may hate the occasional woman who crosses him, but he strikes me as a guy, who’s literally so obsessed with himself, and so egotistical, that there isn’t much room left for hating women in general.
 
In her case (and in yours I guess) it more like: “There’s a theoretical possibility it may happen”, which is a totally useless thing to worry about.

There’s also the same theoretical possibility that the smaller wife may buy a gun and shoot her bigger husband, or knife him while he’s asleep.

To get back to the topic of Yaniv, the TERFs (I assume everyone here uses that expression in a descriptive way and not as a slur. I like it because it’s a handy abbreviation.) think of him as the prototypical trans woman: A perverted autogynophile, who has being a woman (and tampons) as a fetish.

Where I think they’re slightly off the mark, is when they ascribe some intention of violence on Yaniv, or speculate that he has violent thoughts about women. Or even to a lesser degree that he hates women.

(But then again, every man is according to them driven by hate against women and dream of being violent towards them.)

Sure, Yaniv may hate the occasional woman who crosses him, but he strikes me as a guy, who’s literally so obsessed with himself, and so egotistical, that there isn’t much room left for hating women in general.

Jon's in a Norma/Norman relationship. I've known other men like this. They don't typically escalate to physical force true but their relationship with women is not normal.

Like Jon. Ninety percent of the people he's gotten banned are women and he has no probs with that. Put him against a Jason Jones say and other than a Wikipedia hiccup he can't do shit to this person. Same with the elevator video guy. Jon had success for over a decade because he focused on women. Now that men are getting involved, he can't do nuffin.
 
To get back to the topic of Yaniv, the TERFs (I assume everyone here uses that expression in a descriptive way and not as a slur. I like it because it’s a handy abbreviation.) think of him as the prototypical trans woman: A perverted autogynophile, who has being a woman (and tampons) as a fetish.

Naaaaah. It’s more that he is a massive “told ya that’ll happen” with regards to self-ID laws and forbidding any critical debate over the ideology being forced upon a largely unwitting public.

Most normal people that don’t spend all day on Twitter think a trans woman is a poor wee fella who fancies men and wants to be a real girl so bad that he chops off his dick and balls. When in reality, most Male trannies keep their wangs and LARP as lesbians in a way that is simultaneously pathetic, hilarious and deeply creepy.

Edit: I dun spell so gud
 
I don't know... I don't like the idea of being friends with someone just because they hate the same thing- they could still be nuts. I guess just like I distinguish between trannies and troons I make the same distiction between "gender criticals" and TERFs. Being critical of gender norms and such is fine but crazy ladies going on witch hunts, motivated by radical feminism and automatic hatred towards every tranny? No thanks. We're laughing at troons who are doing exceptionally stupid or evil things, not those who are invisible. I doubt anyone on KF would be bothered if they acted like decent people. And TERFs just don't like them existing, that's the difference.

Also, don't take away my porn or something.
 
There is lots more but fuck me, she's delusional and has huge issues that she's projecting onto anyone that isn't a man hater!
I would hardly blame this on Marxism, man hating etc. Women have always complained about their husbands when they had husbands who were pussies.

That being said, it is society's fault for not making her man sack the fuck up.
 
Idk why this forum attracts so many people who want to tell us all how they aren't at all like those cows we're talking about.

Nobody wants to be associated with Yaniv. Whether you think of him as representative of male or female, straight guy or lesbian, transgender or crossdresser, any sane person who also falls into whichever category is going to reflexively say "Jesus fuck, no! We're not like that! I'm not like that!"

And to be fair, Yaniv is almost one of a kind. Just not for the reasons he wants.
 
This is literally exactly how they get to the "lesbians are privileged" position. PIV is rape so "having to date men" is inherently dangerous therefore lesbians are privileged because they never get PIV raped by men. I keep putting "have to" in scare quotes because they will lose thier shit if you start suggesting maybe they just like, don't date or stay single if it's so fucking awful. But they HAAAAVE TOOOOO don't you understand sexuality? Gawd.

This really pisses me off about the TERF position. The extreme radical feminists who push this don't seem to realise they're saying sexual orientation is a choice (except women have chosen to be heterosexual). Who else says sexual orientation is a choice? Troons. I didn't wake up one day and think "you know what sounds like it'd be a great time? Lesbianism."* It just is. Lesbians can be just as fucked up as anyone else on the planet so I don't know why some of them think we are some kind of holy grail. We're just people like anyone else. I wish the troons would leave us alone and I wish the 'COMPHET MAKES WOMEN TOLERATE PIV" ones would leave us alone. I don't want to sit and talk about feminism with you, I want to lie on the sofa watching shit movies and have a truckload of sex that doesn't involve dicks or Dworkin.

* I mean it is a great time but still
 
This really pisses me off about the TERF position. The extreme radical feminists who push this don't seem to realise they're saying sexual orientation is a choice (except women have chosen to be heterosexual). Who else says sexual orientation is a choice? Troons. I didn't wake up one day and think "you know what sounds like it'd be a great time? Lesbianism."* It just is. Lesbians can be just as fucked up as anyone else on the planet so I don't know why some of them think we are some kind of holy grail. We're just people like anyone else. I wish the troons would leave us alone and I wish the 'COMPHET MAKES WOMEN TOLERATE PIV" ones would leave us alone. I don't want to sit and talk about feminism with you, I want to lie on the sofa watching shit movies and have a truckload of sex that doesn't involve dicks or Dworkin.

* I mean it is a great time but still
Additionally, because of the constant screeching about how awful men are in relationships and the laser focus on the size and strength difference, often domestic violence in lesbian relationships is not taken seriously enough.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole