Article Yaniv raided / arrested by RCMP

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
What kind of "show" would he like to have? I honestly really can't imagine any shows with him being able to bring that much money to a channel like TLC🤔

He thinks all this is creating "buzz" around a protected group he feels he's a spokesperson for. And he sees that there are entire shows dedicated to rafter hoarders, massively obese people and someone who didn't even have enough of a dick to make a stink-ditch. Even Christie the meth alcoholic got the most watched Intervention ever.

So for him, it's like "why not me"?? He's not entirely wrong here you know. His timeline has been far more entertaining than The Handmaid's Tale S3 , which people pay tardbux to Hulu every month to watch. If Jon had a miniseries I can't say I wouldn't, but only if it includes Mama Yaniv yelling, Blaire White, a Twitter terve/KF handmaiden side and the promised season finale of him being dead or in actual prison.
 
long time lurker, have only commented a few times now.

you are asking whether he'd be in a male or female prison. we can look at matthew ralf harks, aka madilyn rebecca harks, who was, i believe, kept in a women's prison.

i'm not sure if i'm linking correctly.
article about this dude.

i think i linked correctly, but now i don't know how to add text you can expand. relevant text that suggests he was in a women's prison:

Madilyn Rebecca Harks is a serial child sex offender who confessed to committing approximately 200 offenses against 60 victims. Previously named Matthew Ralf Harks, the convicted predator is male and identifies as a woman. His many victims include neighbors and a fellow church member.

Mr Harks was originally imprisoned for the sexual assaults of two children, a four-year-old girl and a five-year-old girl. While on probation for those offenses, he sexually assaulted a seven-year-old girl, and was handed a three-year prison sentence in 2007.

According to the Vancouver Sun, Mr Harks sexually assaulted two female inmates who were “child-like in appearance” during his incarceration.
 
He thinks all this is creating "buzz" around a protected group he feels he's a spokesperson for. And he sees that there are entire shows dedicated to rafter hoarders, massively obese people and someone who didn't even have enough of a dick to make a stink-ditch. Even Christie the meth alcoholic got the most watched Intervention ever.

So for him, it's like "why not me"?? He's not entirely wrong here you know. His timeline has been far more entertaining than The Handmaid's Tale S3 , which people pay tardbux to Hulu every month to watch. If Jon had a miniseries I can't say I wouldn't, but only if it includes Mama Yaniv yelling, Blaire White, a Twitter terve/KF handmaiden side and the promised season finale of him being dead or in actual prison.
Sounds to me like if TLC allowed him to get a show of his own would they'd be shooting themselves in the foot somehow. I mean I doubt it'd even become that popular anyway if at all
 
The Mounties are the equivalent of the American feds. They show up for crimes in the federal jurisdiction. So yes, usually it's for a big deal and they don't fuck around. Usually.

RCMP are largely responsible for rural uniform policing in most of Canada, and are a sham of a law enforcement agency. For bigger stuff they're slightly more competent, but those investigations typically involve other agencies that do the actual work.

The RCMP are a joke
 
Surrey has a grocery store that specifically hires ex convicts. Hope Johnny dusts off his resume, He's gonna need it for his new career at PricePro 🙂



Honestly I'm surprised he doesn't identify as a white passing middle eastern POC for oppression points even though it conflicts with his racism.
Didn't his mother in the tribunals tried to prove they were not racist by saying their ancestors were from Brazil?

What kind of "show" would he like to have? I honestly really can't imagine any shows with him being able to bring that much money to a channel like TLC🤔
My 600- pound life? I can see him as Steve 2.0.
 
Quick question: if they get a warrant to search his computers on weapons-related charges, and they find CP, that CP is admissible evidence in court for CP charges, right?

Here's to hoping that the mounties have their ducks in a row for going on a fishing expedition for JY's computing devices.

No. In Canada, they'd have to get another warrant to seize his tech and search it for the CP and THEN file CP charges.

So, for those not understanding why the RCMP would be camped out so long, I'll break it down.

John's stungun is illegal in Canada. Because the Langley detachment members not only knew he had it, but gave him advise on how to use it to circumvent the law, they can't be trusted to execute their duties in relation to John. This necessitates bringing in the boys from up the road. They would toss the apartment to find the stungun, but since recovering from a room and not from a person, they can't prove who actually had it.

Now, the RCMP could TECHNICALLY just search the internet for an archive to present as evidence, but then he'd only go down for possession. However, they likely got a warrant to search his computers to check his internet history to trace where he purchased the stungun from. If the RCMP are also seeking evidence regarding something else like CP, they would have to petition the courts for a separate warrant to seize his computers and search them for CP.

If I were to speculate, they're using the search warrant relating to the stungun as a cover to look for other stuff. The longer it takes them to fail to find any prohibited weapons, and his prior ownership of pepper spray justifies a thorough search of the apartment to find any OTHER weapons besides the stungun he showed off, the longer they have to hold the apartment and look for other stuff.

Same thing applies to drugs or evidence for any other sort of charges. So, if in the process of searching his apartment for weapons they find a bag of pills in his dresser, they have to leave it in place and explain in an application for a warrant that in the process of serving a different warrant they found drugs. IF that warrant is then issued they could seize the drugs and file charges with the crown.

If, in trying to trace the purchase of his stungun through his internet history they discovered CP or anything else illegal, they technically can't remove those files from his computer until they have a warrant to do so as those files are technically his property. They also can't hold his computer full of illegal files while waiting for a warrant. So, raiding his computer for a copy of the video showing him brandishing the stungun gives them an excuse to dig through the rest of the hard drive, and doing it on site while also executing another search warrant enables them to prevent John from deleting any illegal files before the RCMP can get a warrant for their seizure. This would be why they didn't just scoop his computers and search for what they want in their office.

The take away from all of this is that Canadian laws cuck everyone who isn't a criminal. You're not allowed to use force to protect yourself, nor can you possess functional weapons except for hunting or competition shooting, and competition weapons must be stored at a gun range. The police also can do very little about crime without jumping through a fuck ton of hoops to prove to the courts that a crime has actually occurred unless they witnessed it themselves. Basically, the executive branch of the federal government holds all the cards, and the only real way to improve police effectiveness is to increase manpower, which increases taxes.

Canada as a nation should probably have a thread tbh.

I've noticed that normies and the local media are slow or unresponsive when it comes to being aware of Yaniv's misadventures. Has anyone considered letting local media outlets know about this? Maybe they could send a van out and we could see news footage from the scene.

Canadian media shuns the "live action" news style of the US, and really tries to avoid talking about anything happening in Canada. Saturday evening we had a mass-shooting at a club in Toronto and it's hardly been spoken about.

Last summer there was a bombing at a child's birthday party somewhere in Ontario, and the bombers fled the scene and successfully avoided being ID'd. Other than the initial reports, which weren't front page news, there's never been any follow up, and there never will be.
 
No. In Canada, they'd have to get another warrant to seize his tech and search it for the CP and THEN file CP charges.

So, for those not understanding why the RCMP would be camped out so long, I'll break it down.

John's stungun is illegal in Canada. Because the Langley detachment members not only knew he had it, but gave him advise on how to use it to circumvent the law, they can't be trusted to execute their duties in relation to John. This necessitates bringing in the boys from up the road. They would toss the apartment to find the stungun, but since recovering from a room and not from a person, they can't prove who actually had it.

Now, the RCMP could TECHNICALLY just search the internet for an archive to present as evidence, but then he'd only go down for possession. However, they likely got a warrant to search his computers to check his internet history to trace where he purchased the stungun from. If the RCMP are also seeking evidence regarding something else like CP, they would have to petition the courts for a separate warrant to seize his computers and search them for CP.

If I were to speculate, they're using the search warrant relating to the stungun as a cover to look for other stuff. The longer it takes them to fail to find any prohibited weapons, and his prior ownership of pepper spray justifies a thorough search of the apartment to find any OTHER weapons besides the stungun he showed off, the longer they have to hold the apartment and look for other stuff.

Same thing applies to drugs or evidence for any other sort of charges. So, if in the process of searching his apartment for weapons they find a bag of pills in his dresser, they have to leave it in place and explain in an application for a warrant that in the process of serving a different warrant they found drugs. IF that warrant is then issued they could seize the drugs and file charges with the crown.

If, in trying to trace the purchase of his stungun through his internet history they discovered CP or anything else illegal, they technically can't remove those files from his computer until they have a warrant to do so as those files are technically his property. They also can't hold his computer full of illegal files while waiting for a warrant. So, raiding his computer for a copy of the video showing him brandishing the stungun gives them an excuse to dig through the rest of the hard drive, and doing it on site while also executing another search warrant enables them to prevent John from deleting any illegal files before the RCMP can get a warrant for their seizure. This would be why they didn't just scoop his computers and search for what they want in their office.

The take away from all of this is that Canadian laws cuck everyone who isn't a criminal. You're not allowed to use force to protect yourself, nor can you possess functional weapons except for hunting or competition shooting, and competition weapons must be stored at a gun range. The police also can do very little about crime without jumping through a fuck ton of hoops to prove to the courts that a crime has actually occurred unless they witnessed it themselves. Basically, the executive branch of the federal government holds all the cards, and the only real way to improve police effectiveness is to increase manpower, which increases taxes.

Canada as a nation should probably have a thread tbh.

It was called long ago. Most Burgerstans didn't see it at the time as anything BUT satire. Twenty years later, it all makes sense.

 

Just FYI, it's called "reasonable grounds" in Canada. Because British English.

In the U.S., if your initial search wouldn't have covered the search that uncovered the other contraband, you can't use that as evidence, under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. I am not sure how Canada handles this, but probably in some similar way, although if anything, they probably have even less respect for your rights in such a search. That's just a guess, though.

And you're correct. There are a few work arounds for such situations I'm not going to explain, but in order to get warrants in Canada you have to present the courts with evidence that a crime has occurred or is very likely to have occurred, and those warrants are VERY specific. Say the police are forewarned someone is transporting something illegal in the trunk of their car, and the police then see that vehicle being driven down the road. They can stop the vehicle but can only search the trunk of the car.
 
Depends on the correctional department. For bipolar/mild schizophrenia here it tends to go Zyprexa, Risperdal, Seroquel, Geodon, Clozaril. And Haldol is still the first injection given for a psychotic chimpout. But while there is a standard formulary, inmates can and do request psych med changes... and sometimes they're even given them.

Edit: And Remeron seems to be the most prescribed antidepressant for some reason... maybe because it makes them fat and docile?
Clozaril? My Susan senses are tingling.
As for Remeron- I didn't know much about it before but a lot of patients seem to complain of memory loss and changes in heart rythm. And it can worsen mania in bipolar people. How do they decide which meds are going to be used at their facility?
 
The reality in Leafistan may not be what Ms. Trudeau would have you believe. Immigration up there has limits and a point system to screen in those with means and ability, with certain countries being given a significant advantage for a long history of the cultures cooperating (Commonwealth, Nordic countries, etc)... you know the exact same system he calls Trump a racist for proposing

Except those who enter under refugee claims. Or those who are sponsored by family members who did meet those criteria.

Jugdish might have gotten here on merit, but his entire extended family didn't. He was allowed to bring them. That's why there are so many ancient East Indians working as cleaners. After five years, they qualify for the Canadian Pension Plan same as anyone else.
 
We’ve had women arrested in the uk for misgendering, the coppers sent round over tweets, people taken to court for expressing concerns over puberty blockers and people losing their jobs over it. The ability to say what you think in Britain is dead and buried. KF is the one place I can mock the exceptional without consequence. If cases like yaniv’s lead to a tiny bit of backlash in the real world I’ll be happy

Just wait until the chickens come home to roost on the Trans Kids issue.

I believe that what’s playing out in front of us now, will result in the biggest medical scandal since Thalidomide. But at least Thalidomide was an honest mistake.
 
Eh, on the contrary I would say that cops typically *want* citizens to know the proper methods of being law-abiding, especially when it comes to weapons. In the United States at least, cops are frequently among the most pro-2nd Amendment people out there, and advise citizens who get into trouble with guns (e.g. for not having proper registration or whatever) on how to avoid getting into further trouble in the future.

Regardless, it's sad and pathetic how cucked Canada is that you can't even lawfully own a taser or pepper spray up there, let alone a proper semi-automatic firearm. You'd think Canadians would be all about gun ownership, considering how much splendid wilderness there is available for hunting.


You can own pepper spray. it's only illegal to use on humans.

Laws in Canada are written around intent. Not the object itself. (Exceptions being outright banned items like switch blades)

Walking around with a can of bear spray in a large city like Toronto where there are no bears is going to get you attention. No issues if you are in rural areas with bear/couger problems.

Carrying a small personal size pepper spray won't get you attention in the city because you are allowed to protect yourself from things like aggressive dogs.

There are no size limits on things like knives, you just can't be strolling around with a machete in the city for no goof reason.. intent

Collapsible batons are legal, but the have to be FULLY visible and once again, your reasons for having it have to reasonable. A drug dealer or other hoodlum is gonna have issues. not so much someone
who works security.
 
Clozaril? My Susan senses are tingling.
As for Remeron- I didn't know much about it before but a lot of patients seem to complain of memory loss and changes in heart rythm. And it can worsen mania in bipolar people. How do they decide which meds are going to be used at their facility?
Any antidepressant given to someone with bipolar can, and frequently does, make mania worse, mood stabilisers have to be given along side them to prevent it.

Honestly I haven't seen anyone reporting side effects that severe in a quick search, so I'm gonna go out on a whim and say those are probably rare effects. The most common side effects seem similar to most other antidepressants- sickness, drowsiness, strange dreams and weight gain. Heart conditions are listed under side effects, but under "Frequency not Known." All antidepressants have a lot of risks, including heart conditions and, ironically, even suicidal behaviour. Remeron doesn't seem to be that different than any other drug in that sense, it's likely they chose to use it because it was the cheapest option for their local pharmacy. It's all about that money, in the UK we don't even use branded drugs- everything is generic (Prozac -> Fluoxetine/Valium -> Diazapam etc) because its so much cheaper with no difference in the medications lol.
 
No it's not, commented similar a little while back. Both seem quiet.

Usually, when something happens he's quick off the starter blocks complaining, bragging or threatening. he hasn't done anything like that, mama neither.

Makes me think they may be a tad worried about something as I can't see them taking the advice of anyone to shut their gobs.


Miriam doesn't have social media accounts.
Anything with her name is Jonathan pretending to be her.

She stated more then once she has no accounts at the tribunals.
When she said that, Jonathan would start cutting her off because he doesn't want people getting wise to that fact.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole