- Dołączono
- 22 Mar 2018
While I agree that staying radio silent would not have been a good idea, trying to make a situation about Internet "cancelcCulture" that was not at all a case of cancel culture, and claiming that you're gathering hate messages they've gotten over the controversy, stealing your own husband's tweet after people rightfully called her out for using a dead man as leverage, and then saying she deserves punishment and that all clown memes are deserved and still talking as though she's a victim in a situation she put herself in really doesn't help her look any better.
Whether or not what she was saying was right or whether or not she had a point: doing it this soon, while using Etika's name for something that didn't happen, and then stealing a Tweet from your ex-husband (while said ex-huband is telling others that using a death for self-gain is scummy) is a horrible look. At least if she waited a week or just said a simple "I'm sorry" with nothing else attached, just those two words: then I could understand. It was the same with the divorce, whether or not Holly was right or wrong, trying to create a narrative of complete innocence in a situation as messy as this while pinning mental health and unrelated topics to it will only serve to make the Internet hate you even more.
That seems like you just want a specific apology tailored to you, and that anything that doesn't fit that reaction is disingenuous, which I disagree with. If she's apologizing, that should be good enough, but we live in an age where apologies do not bring satisfaction, it only brings more calls for specific ways to apologize or specific consequences. I guarantee you if she brought this up next week exactly as you prescribed, someone else is going to ask why it took her so long to apologize and still call her apology disingenuous based on the length of time it took for her to give an apology.