🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

z55EjfE.jpg

TJ cup-a-soooooup!
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The on-site medical staff at my complex have expressed concern over my frequent migraines. I gotta stop trying to make sense of TJ's comments.

Not sure about this, but I believe it's pointless to call it "trying" once it is done successfully.

On the other hand, we are talking about one of you trying to make sense of them, which may cause headaches the way it seems to when I attempt the same thing with some of yours. (I often start to wonder if, as someone previously suggested, you aren't actually joking about something &/or failing to make sense, hoping I'll make attempts to understand them when the individual poster knew while typing it such an attempt would be fruitless.)

Finally, I must respond specifically to Post 2204... Phil Ken Sebben asks me to prove my claim of intelligence superiority. He says my words sound like "word salad" to the rest of you, & claims that "unlike" me, "most of" you "are literate". He ends this same post calling me "Churchie", & claiming my words prove what he claims is the fact that I'm "an idiot"...

... I skipped over the middle, as I am saving the best for last: He states I should realize that quoting Mark Twain doesn't making me "any less of a fool" (implying the laughable idea I am one). However, he uses Twain's real name, misspelling the surname, which was correctly spelled by Loke on the directly-previous page.
 
Not sure about this, but I believe it's pointless to call it "trying" once it is done successfully.

On the other hand, we are talking about one of you trying to make sense of them, which may cause headaches the way it seems to when I attempt the same thing with some of yours. (I often start to wonder if, as someone previously suggested, you aren't actually joking about something &/or failing to make sense, hoping I'll make attempts to understand them when the individual poster knew while typing it such an attempt would be fruitless.)

Finally, I must respond specifically to Post 2204... Phil Ken Sebben asks me to prove my claim of intelligence superiority. He says my words sound like "word salad" to the rest of you, & claims that "unlike" me, "most of" you "are literate". He ends this same post calling me "Churchie", & claiming my words prove what he claims is the fact that I'm "an idiot"...

... I skipped over the middle, as I am saving the best for last: He states I should realize that quoting Mark Twain doesn't making me "any less of a fool" (implying the laughable idea I am one). However, he uses Twain's real name, misspelling the surname, which was correctly spelled by Loke on the directly-previous page.

Question- do you talk like this, or is it only a text thing?
 
I find the mental image of TJ sperging out overly flowery and unnecessarily long prose to some baffled cashier or waitress hysterical.
 
Not sure about this, but I believe it's pointless to call it "trying" once it is done successfully.

On the other hand, we are talking about one of you trying to make sense of them, which may cause headaches the way it seems to when I attempt the same thing with some of yours. (I often start to wonder if, as someone previously suggested, you aren't actually joking about something &/or failing to make sense, hoping I'll make attempts to understand them when the individual poster knew while typing it such an attempt would be fruitless.)

Finally, I must respond specifically to Post 2204... Phil Ken Sebben asks me to prove my claim of intelligence superiority. He says my words sound like "word salad" to the rest of you, & claims that "unlike" me, "most of" you "are literate". He ends this same post calling me "Churchie", & claiming my words prove what he claims is the fact that I'm "an idiot"...

... I skipped over the middle, as I am saving the best for last: He states I should realize that quoting Mark Twain doesn't making me "any less of a fool" (implying the laughable idea I am one). However, he uses Twain's real name, misspelling the surname, which was correctly spelled by Loke on the directly-previous page.

1) I think you misinterpreted his words. He said that he didn't understand you; that's why he is getting migraines, from the brain damage necessary to understand your sentence structures.

2) I could walk you through some of it if it made you feel better. Want me to hold your hand too?

3) Respond away, I got plenty of patience. You do need to prove something like that. Regardless of what you would like to say about us, the fact of the matter is that there are many people on this forum, many of which probably have wonderful jobs (the word 'probably' is there because I never asked, since it's none of my business), wonderful lives, and wonderful intellects. The only way we can tell from here is from their own word and from how they write. By the way, this last fact alone means you're not looking so hot, but I digress. From an objective standpoint, I have to say that your sentences are a bit choppy and unstructured, as if you're trying to put too many words into a simpler sentence. See what I'm saying; you with me so far? Yes, most of us are literate. Being literate means we can read and write. What do you think we do here? If you don't like the nickname "Churchie," then you can ask him nicely to stop. And again, you really need to prove through some action that you are, in fact, smarter than us, because nothing so monumental as you being smarter than dozens of people can go unproven- it's just not how society works, friend.

4) How do you know the middle doesn't have any important information? You may wanna check, just to be sure. To be fair, quotes are easy to get nowadays, and can be used incorrectly, or, in this case, unintentionally ironic.

5) Somebody else being the residential fool? I am insulted! Your presence insults me, good sir. (Not really- it's called a joke)

6) I wouldn't recommend pointing out others' errors, lest yours be likewise pointed out in great detail.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The irony of Mr. Church reprimanding someone else for a minor typographical error may have broken me.
 
Not sure about this, but I believe it's pointless to call it "trying" once it is done successfully.
... He states I should realize that quoting Mark Twain doesn't making me "any less of a fool" (implying the laughable idea I am one).

You're right. You're not a fool.

You're simply a pervert who writes seventh-grade-level prose and tries to convince people he's some sort of genius by resurrecting dead threads on obscure internet forums and regurgitating the tired old argument that 'he is smarter than everyone because he says so' over and over and over again.

You're more of a simpleton than a fool, really.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Finally, I must respond specifically to Post 2204... Phil Ken Sebben asks me to prove my claim of intelligence superiority. He says my words sound like "word salad" to the rest of you, & claims that "unlike" me, "most of" you "are literate". He ends this same post calling me "Churchie", & claiming my words prove what he claims is the fact that I'm "an idiot"...

... I skipped over the middle, as I am saving the best for last: He states I should realize that quoting Mark Twain doesn't making me "any less of a fool" (implying the laughable idea I am one). However, he uses Twain's real name, misspelling the surname, which was correctly spelled by Loke on the directly-previous page.
That wasn't a response. That was a summary.
 
Not sure about this, but I believe it's pointless to call it "trying" once it is done successfully.

Aww, senpai noticed me! I knew he couldn't resist responding if I set myself up for an insult. How cute.

He also powiedział(a):
On the other hand, we are talking about one of you trying to make sense of them, which may cause headaches the way it seems to when I attempt the same thing with some of yours. (I often start to wonder if, as someone previously suggested, you aren't actually joking about something &/or failing to make sense, hoping I'll make attempts to understand them when the individual poster knew while typing it such an attempt would be fruitless.)

Let me see if I can try to communicate on your level. I do apparently have a 142 IQ, after all.
Ahem.
I assume "one of you," is referring to me, BOLDYSPICY! (or BS!, why not? Seeing as you have a penchant for both shorthand & sophomoric humor)---why can't you just address me directly? Perhaps it is because you feel I am so far beneath you, but this is just conjecture on my part. At any rate, as to why I seemingly have trouble trying to comprehend your posts---because I have to hack through all the pseudo-intellectual fluff & go over your stream-of-consciousness with a proverbial fine-toothed comb in order to locate the point that you are impotently trying to communicate. On the other end of the spectrum, why does trying to comprehend my posts tax you so? I tend to favor brevity, as opposed to you; it seems I was erroneous in my assumption that your highly advanced mind would be capable of processing such straightforward statements. Perhaps you see now why the general consensus is, in fact, that you are not so intelligent as you claim.

I hope this sheds some light on your confusion.

There. I used words in the wrong context, didn't address some of his points, threw in a dig or two there, & overall failed to make any fucking sense, much less communicate a point. GUISE AM I DOING IT RITE
 
@Cowlick
Let's assume for a moment that you are the smartest person here and we're a bunch of subhumans who can barely breathe unaided like you keep telling yourself.
If that's the case, then you're coming here insulting a bunch of tards who are jealously making fun of you and are too dumb to know any better, or even learn not to it. Does making fun of re.tards make you feel warm and fuzzy inside? Why are you wasting your most likely extremely limited time on Earth on your inferiors?

I'm well aware of my hypocrisy, but this seems to be his Standard Operating Procedure everywhere he posts.
 
1) I think you misinterpreted his words. He said that he didn't understand you; that's why he is getting migraines, from the brain damage necessary to understand your sentence structures.

Hahaha, thanks for the validation, mang. Sometimes I worry that I'm really a couple hot dogs short of a picnic, & maybe that's why I muddle through his. . .assault on the English language. Sad when TJ makes me start questioning my own intelligence (or lack thereof).

Not that it really matters, but I'm actually female. The only reason I bring this up is because is it just my imagination, or does TJ go out of his way to ignore female users?
 
Hahaha, thanks for the validation, mang. Sometimes I worry that I'm really a couple hot dogs short of a picnic, & maybe that's why I muddle through his. . .assault on the English language. Sad when TJ makes me start questioning my own intelligence (or lack thereof).

Not that it really matters, but I'm actually female. The only reason I bring this up is because is it just my imagination, or does TJ go out of his way to ignore female users?

No problem. If you ask me, being a bit... eccentric is acceptable, and even beneficial at times. And you can't do any worse interpreting him than he is trying to convey the idea in the first place. Yeah, if he gets you to question your intelligence, then something seems to be wrong. He has yet to provide a reason to, after all.

I don't know about that. He's mostly ignoring me, and I'm a guy, so it could be him ignoring who he considers to be female. Or he could be ignoring those who doesn't think are smart. Or he's just laughing at us on the other side of the screen. Either way, he's a scumbag.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole