🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[Chuggernaut]

The number of times anyone wins anything is based not only on their ability in the task, but that of their competitors. Therefore, your increased number of wins can be "chalked-up" to the the fact that (as you suggest of me) your parents, the government, some combination, &/or people I did not name or list put you in a remedial-intelligence school so the majority of more intelligent folks would not have interact with you, thereby undoubtedly lowering the risk of injury or death to you or anyone else.

This seems to also accomplish the task of pointing out you ate smarter than some (your former bee opponents), but it would be incorrect to count me among them.

How would you know what an educational program of any sort is like? By your own admission you haven't taken a class of any sort in almost twenty years. You might as well be trying to lecture me on having a job.

 

[Ti-99/4A]

These things just make themselves sometimes.

 

[klystron]

Let's say, hypothetically, there were something I could write or post a picture of right here that would prove my so-called "claim". If that were the case, I'd post it here. Anyone not previously involved in the thread who had (for whatever reason) read this far into it would see that is pointless & approaching redundancy, as they would already be aware of the honesty/truth of my claim, having read all my previous posts in the thread.

Let's say hypothetically that a forum member would email you something from a trusted source showing his accomplishments if you would have just provided even a temporary email address. Therefore, said forum member would prove that at least one forum member is way more accomplished than you and it would hurt your feelings because your reality bubble would pop and the imaginary sense of self that holds up your fragile psyche and keeps from you offing yourself will instantly vanish. Let's suppose that rather than accept this proof, you decided to just continue your pursuit of this false reality that you are somehow worth anything and not give the forum member to do exactly what you say you would do if you could, which is to show proof. That seems more hypocritical than hypothetical to me. Maybe this is a sign of your advanced intelligence.

 

[ON 190]

Regardless of that claim, I (again) understand it, but doubt its honesty... Especially the latter part, where you claim to enjoy something I see you do rarely-if-ever, often in fact seeming to intentionally not do it.

The cognitive dissonance here is staggering. We're to take you at your word for your accomplishments, but you won't take anyone else's word for theirs. It's like I said in your profile, what would I have to gain by lying to you about my academic accomplishments?

This seems to also accomplish the task of pointing out you ate smarter than some (your former bee opponents)

Please don't accuse us of cannibalism.

 

[Le Bateleur]

So what does @Cowlick sound like? Discuss.

His phone number is publicly available; call him up and find out.

Please don't do this. It'd be almost as stupid as posting on forums using your real name...

 

[DrChristianTroy]

So @Cowlick, Top 5 dead or alive. Who are they?

 

[DespicableFool]

I know what you wrote is not a compliment, but it matters not, as what you wrote before that is a misstatement of what I'd written. Let me try again...

Let's say, hypothetically, there were something I could write or post a picture of right here that would prove my so-called "claim". If that were the case, I'd post it here. Anyone not previously involved in the thread who had (for whatever reason) read this far into it would see that is pointless & approaching redundancy, as they would already be aware of the honesty/truth of my claim, having read all my previous posts in the thread.]

I bet there is something you can post here that will prove your superior intelligence. You could even compare to me, perhaps the newest member here. Sure, it may indeed be insufficient compared to everyone, but it will get the ball rolling. And again, like I said to you last time, you can even decide how to outdo me. This the equivalent of me going "Hit me," alright. What are you afraid of? I'll even give you some suggestions. You could come up with a question or a series of questions that I can't answer, or we can compare life accomplishments. Take your pick sir, or forever be remembered for your cowardice. You are being challenged by an 18 year old, after all; how could you lose?

 

[Mr. X]

1] Yes, I have repeatedly claimed to be the smartest poster in the thread without showing proof. In order to prove that claim, all I need to prove is I am smarter than everyone else posting in it, which is clearly seen & proven to anyone who has read the thread (a chihuahua could overstep the bar, you all set it so low).

2] I also admit that I have read most, but not all, of your posts in their entirety. I read & attempt to comprehend each one individually, but eventually realize (almost without any exceptions) that, much the way it may be difficult to gain the intelligence necessary for some of you to understand some of what I say in the thread or PMs, it is impossible for me to lose the intelligence necessary to understand what you write... Well, perhaps my neurosurgeon could fix that, but then I'd be that stupid permanently (as many of you appear to be) & unable to continue the normal conversations & interactions people offline know me to have been involved in.

Your narcissistic personality disorder is acting up again. Please take your medicine.

 

[ON 190]

Let's say, hypothetically, there were something I could write or post a picture of right here that would prove my so-called "claim". If that were the case, I'd post it here.

So you admit there isn't any proof. You can't claim I'm misquoting you or twisting your words, since that is literally what you said.

 

[ThatGuy]

1] Yes, I have repeatedly claimed to be the smartest poster in the thread without showing proof. In order to prove that claim, all I need to prove is I am smarter than everyone else posting in it, which is clearly seen & proven to anyone who has read the thread (a chihuahua could overstep the bar, you all set it so low).

2] I also admit that I have read most, but not all, of your posts in their entirety. I read & attempt to comprehend each one individually, but eventually realize (almost without any exceptions) that, much the way it may be difficult to gain the intelligence necessary for some of you to understand some of what I say in the thread or PMs, it is impossible for me to lose the intelligence necessary to understand what you write... Well, perhaps my neurosurgeon could fix that, but then I'd be that stupid permanently (as many of you appear to be) & unable to continue the normal conversations & interactions people offline know me to have been involved in.

"I have proven how smart I am by continuity saying how smart I am"

Do you have a hamster running inside a wheel in your head? Because you just go around and around, and don't make any sense whatsoever.

Wyświetl załącznik 9571
These things just make themselves sometimes.

Timmmy!!!

 

[MrsFrizzle]

The cognitive dissonance here is staggering. We're to take you at your word for your accomplishments, but you won't take anyone else's word for theirs. It's like I said in your profile, what would I have to gain by lying to you about my academic accomplishments?

I'm willing to take him at his word about his accomplishments. He won a local spelling bee several times and had one or more articles published in a local newspaper. We're not talking Nobel Prize candidacy here.

 

[ON 190]

I'm willing to take him at his word about his accomplishments. He won a local spelling bee several times and had one or more articles published in a local newspaper. We're not talking Nobel Prize candidacy here.

That's the best thing. Most of us haven't doubted his accomplishments, only his constant claims that they make him better than all of us.

 

[CatParty]

@Cowlick why won't you accept the challenge? What are you hiding?

 

[ON 190]

@Cowlick why won't you accept the challenge? What are you hiding?

Many many bodies.

 

[Le Bateleur]

Cowlick, do you play chess? Or poker? Backgammon? Magic: the Gathering, even? Any kind of game with some intellectual bent?

Even better: what game do you play that requires the most intelligence?

Name the game, and we'll put up a champion to challenge your brilliance.

What say you?

 

[ON 190]

Cowlick, do you play chess? Or poker? Backgammon? Magic: the Gathering, even? Any kind of game with some intellectual bent?

Even better: what game do you play that requires the most intelligence?

Name the game, and we'll put up a champion to challenge your brilliance.

What say you?

Note to @Cowlick: Go Fish and Uno are not acceptable games to challenge us to.

 

[DespicableFool]

Cowlick, do you play chess? Or poker? Backgammon? Magic: the Gathering, even? Any kind of game with some intellectual bent?

Even better: what game do you play that requires the most intelligence?

Name the game, and we'll put up a champion to challenge your brilliance.

What say you?

Whatever it is, I call dibs on being first. Glass Joe va toujours premier!

Edit: Yes, I admit that me likening myself to Glass Joe suggests that I would suck. What's your point?

 

[ChuckSlaughter]

No... I said they have more stupidity, which you have just (again) proven.

Poor cowlick, I don't think its very good for you. Don't you feel bad or angry after reading this? It seems like you do.
Save yourself the trouble and just don't look.

Can you explain how you're more intelligent than others on this site? Saying "It's clearly proven" or "It's obvious" doesn't count.

It's self evident as you would see if (by any unusual & miniscule chance) you had a brain for even a moment to think it!

TEAR DOWN THE THREAD! TEAR DOWN THE THREAD!

 

[DespicableFool]

TEAR DOWN THE THREAD! TEAR DOWN THE THREAD!

But...I just started...

 

[Poor Choices]

I know what you wrote is not a compliment, but it matters not, as what you wrote before that is a misstatement of what I'd written. Let me try again...

Let's say, hypothetically, there were something I could write or post a picture of right here that would prove my so-called "claim". If that were the case, I'd post it here. Anyone not previously involved in the thread who had (for whatever reason) read this far into it would see that is pointless & approaching redundancy, as they would already be aware of the honesty/truth of my claim, having read all my previous posts in the thread.

First if you're worried about redundancy you don't need to call us all morons every night. Second, you base your argument of superior intelligence on an unproven assumption - that an outside observer would both understand the logic of your arguments and judge them to be more sound than this forums'. Imagine despite your pre-conceived notions that you are in fact stupid. Now further imagine that stupid you proves your intelligence by citing an imaginary third party that agrees you are the smartest person on this board. Take special note that your (in this scenario) third party is imagined so their intelligence is limited by your own - no wonder they would agree you were the smartest person they'd met! If this were anyone but you, given your "skill" to call users out posting claims without definite proof, you'd point out that they were a self-masturbatory jackass so far off point that it physically hurt.

Isn't it possible, oh mighty Lord, that you could be the dumbest one here and your stupidity would prevent you from realizing?

*takes another hit off the bong*