🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

He keeps trying "TJ Church" and it isn't working. I don't think he understands the meaning of "popular".

Totally understand! From Webster's online... "pop·u·lar adjective \ˈpä-pyə-lər\
: liked or enjoyed by many people

: accepted, followed, used, or done by many people"

Members have posted under my pic next to each of my posts that I'm a "personal hero & best friend", whereas others repeatedly say they want me here! Sounds "popular" to me!
 
Cowlick powiedział(a):
Adding nothing to what you posted (& in fact removing some), we (in actuality, you) have shown that "Chugger" being "an actively-publishing journalist" tells us nothing about their ability or quality level, & the same lack of information would be learned if they informed us how much they were paid for any of the times they were published.

I literally have no idea what this word salad is supposed to mean. Yes, everyone here could be lying about everything and Chuggernaut could never have published a single article. But there are literally hundreds of thousands of people in the US alone who get paid for writing; why is it so unlikely this forum's members might include some of them?

And congratulations on publishing a newspaper article. Sincerely, that's great. But full-time journalists publish several articles every week, unless they're working on a long-form feature (which might require a week or two to research and write, particularly for stories of 2,500 words or more). It's not an easy way to earn a living, to say the least.
 
Totally understand! From Webster's online... "pop·u·lar adjective \ˈpä-pyə-lər\
: liked or enjoyed by many people

: accepted, followed, used, or done by many people"

Members have posted under my pic next to each of my posts that I'm a "personal hero & best friend", whereas others repeatedly say they want me here! Sounds "popular" to me!

Great! Now please show your understanding and PM me an email address.
 
Totally understand! From Webster's online... "pop·u·lar adjective \ˈpä-pyə-lər\
: liked or enjoyed by many people

: accepted, followed, used, or done by many people"

Members have posted under my pic next to each of my posts that I'm a "personal hero & best friend", whereas others repeatedly say they want me here! Sounds "popular" to me!
It's because the sh!t you say is ironically hilarious, not because we like you as a person.
 
Totally understand! From Webster's online... "pop·u·lar adjective \ˈpä-pyə-lər\
: liked or enjoyed by many people

: accepted, followed, used, or done by many people"

Members have posted under my pic next to each of my posts that I'm a "personal hero & best friend", whereas others repeatedly say they want me here! Sounds "popular" to me!

Hate to break it to ya, bub, but that's kinda a joke. He probably thinks you to be an annoying knat. Also, could you quote a few people saying they sincerely want you here? And not because we like to laugh at you, mind you; present me with evidence that you are actually liked around here for your endearing personality.
 
Guys I don't think @Cowlick will send me an email address. He asks for proof of our achievements but refuses to perform even the simplest acts to obtain it. I think that he is afraid of accepting that some people are more accomplished than he. :(
 
TJ, even a 5 year old could take a picture of an article with their phone and blur out the details.

It's obvious that you're just a liar.

Or maybe you are just less intelligent than a 5 year old.
 
It's because the sh!t you say is ironically hilarious, not because we like you as a person.

The question asks you to name a popular one, regardless of reason. Also, I was a popular one before I was ever actually here.

Secondly, simply search the thread, & see others posting they want me here &/or like having me here; I claimed that was the case, & it can be proven, regardless of reason(s).

Lastly, since everyone loves to correct me here (even when I'm right), let me point out the Fool mentioning how something that was written "sounds" to them.

TJ, even a 5 year old could take a picture of an article with their phone and blur out the details.

It's obvious that you're just a liar.

Or maybe you are just less intelligent than a 5 year old.

I'm not less intelligent than a 5-year-old, though many here have proven themselves to be. (Besides the fact you're misstating that they'd be able to do.)
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
The question asks you to name a popular one, regardless of reason. Also, I was a popular one before I was ever actually here.

No, you weren't. Four posts in this thread, then it died due to lack of interest. People were more interested in Nick Bate, or Moleman or Mylar. Literally anyone else but you.
 
I don't know. Most of us are capable of not double-posting. Seems like a basic skill you could teach a 5-year-old.
 
I'm not less intelligent than a 5-year-old,

Yes, you've proven that you are - as you cannot complete a simple task that would get many people here off your back. Take a damn picture of your article that was published. No excuses.

You're a liar and less intelligent than a child. Proven fact, nothing you say can dispute that.
 
No, you weren't. Four posts in this thread, then it died due to lack of interest.

It certainly wasn't due to lack of interest... If there was no interest in me or my "lolcow"-related status, there never would've been a thread (as there never should've been). However, my experience due to this thread existing proves it was not due to the other members knowing the impropriety of posting such things about me.
 
The question asks you to name a popular one, regardless of reason. Also, I was a popular one before I was ever actually here.

Secondly, simply search the thread, & see others posting they want me here &/or like having me here; I claimed that was the case, & it can be proven, regardless of reason(s).

Lastly, since everyone loves to correct me here (even when I'm right), let me point out the Fool mentioning how something that was written "sounds" to them.

With us, though: No. And the question is structured in a way that makes the answer obvious. Allow me to help you out: Who was this wiki made in order to document? I can hook you up to a wonderful wiki with all the information you need if you so desire.

Sounds to me like you're admitting that you like being a troll. Are you a troll, TJ? By the way, no, we don't like having you here. You are a rather rude houseguest, and we are simply making the most with what we're given.

Oh; he mentioned me, I got the warms. Yeah; it's fun to correct people- you seem to agree based on your earlier comments. Oh yeah; you TOTALLY are, buddy! We all know it. Also, scoff; I love how you say 'the' before my name. I didn't know I had a fan. And yeah, you use your eyes to hear things. And your nose! :lol: (IN case you were too stupid, that was a reference to the song, by the way.)
 
It certainly wasn't due to lack of interest... If there was no interest in me or my "lolcow"-related status, there never would've been a thread (as there never should've been). However, my experience due to this thread existing proves it was not due to the other members knowing the impropriety of posting such things about me.
One person who heard of you from a website made a thread. Nobody else cared. If you hadn't of awkwardly pretended to be some guy and bumped it (half a year after the last post), it'd of stayed at 4 posts.
 
It certainly wasn't due to lack of interest... If there was no interest in me or my "lolcow"-related status, there never would've been a thread (as there never should've been). However, my experience due to this thread existing proves it was not due to the other members knowing the impropriety of posting such things about me.
Four people does not constitute interest, much like your sister liking your porn does not constitute you being popular before you blew up on this site.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole