🦊 Furry Furry Fandom and Drama General

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Holdek
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Users are bawwwing over the new Tumblr rules.

Wyświetl załącznik 608415

Get the fuck over it Tumblr are cleaning up their site and it's only a matter of time before Twitter follows.

Can't wait for Twitter to ban adult content and cause all the murrsuiters to rise up and start talking about sex worker solidarity and safety again.

'cause if there's anything that children sold into sex slavery in Pattaya and people on the internet posting pictures of themselves humping in carpets have in common, it's...hrm.
 
Can't wait for Twitter to ban adult content and cause all the murrsuiters to rise up and start talking about sex worker solidarity and safety again.

'cause if there's anything that children sold into sex slavery in Pattaya and people on the internet posting pictures of themselves humping in carpets have in common, it's...hrm.

the salt that would flow from twitter if they banned adult content would be able to season all of America's fast food and then some.
 
Rather shocked nobody posted it yet, but here is Violent J's fursuit.
DtRgFW4WwAAK-Uv.jpg

DtR8eGEWwAAk8Sw.jpg
DtTHhDpV4AA31au.jpg
Weird, innit.

I hate to say it but it's a nicely made head. Good shaving, looks like it's meant to resemble a skull? Not bad at all. Wouldn't want to see it in a dark alley though.

Here's the thing: I'm a furry and an :islamic: degenerate who has pics of Tawna Bandicoot on his cell phone, but hate fursuits, the entire community and all of its "major figures" and would laugh my ass off if all the zoosadists, diaperfags, and zoophiles got "free helicopter rides". What does that make me?

Maybe I'm just like Kage https://youtube.com/watch?v=2uyOksOPZlg
Edit: this post is cancer and deserves to be bad rated

How can you have been here since August but still act like you joined 4 minutes ago?
 
The problem is that we think of the children, but they don't.

And if you ask furries to think of the children, they just LOL at you and hit you with a Simpsons meme. Or piss themselves in anger and snap about how furry cons are adult events.

Users are bawwwing over the new Tumblr rules.

Wyświetl załącznik 608415

Get the fuck over it Tumblr are cleaning up their site and it's only a matter of time before Twitter follows.



He's banned from almost every website.

https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Tay_Ferret

I sincerely hope he's in prison where he belongs.



Many young furries would give their right arm to have such a supportive dad who takes them to furry conventions, kudos to him.

And I’ll take the negative responses on this one willingly - as I’m not a ICP fan, I basically don’t care one fuck about his fursuit; so far as him being a ‘supportive dad’ - yeah, sure, right.

Takes his daughter to a fetish con full of thirsty nerds, perverts, pedos, zoophiles, and just plain old creeps. He’s not exactly doing her a favor; I think this is just him getting attention and Twitter likes.
 
Known sex-offenders at fur cons aren't a problem because folk can steer clear of them, it's the ones that folk don't know about that are the real problem, often using furry and furry-cons as a facade for their sexual perversions.

The problem with furries is they single out the creeps and perverts on baseless rumors or simply because a fur looks weird or creepy while the real sex-offenders are undetectable.

(I admit known sex-offenders are a problem because the majority are freaked-out by them and don't want to associate or be seen near them)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Known sex-offenders at fur cons aren't a problem because folk can steer clear of them, it's the ones that folk don't know about that are the real problem, often using furry and furry-cons as a facade for their sexual perversions.

That doesn't cut it when it's a con where they deliberately let adults and minors mingle, many of whom have no clue who the convicted sex offenders are who the people running the con are totally okay with being there.
 
That doesn't cut it when it's a con where they deliberately let adults and minors mingle, many of whom have no clue who the convicted sex offenders are who the people running the con are totally okay with being there.

The only way fur-cons could work around this is to rewrite the convention rule book banning sex-offenders from attending, all attendees would have to be screened for sex-offenses and some cons would lose key staff.

I'm pretty sure that's not going to happen in the foreseeable future so the only way forward is for folk to be on-guard and report any sex-offenders.

If a fur-con bans somebody with a spent conviction this could be construed as discrimination and land the con in hot water and possibly court paying compensation, don't underestimate the powers of the human rights act.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The only way fur-cons could work around this is to rewrite the convention rule book banning sex-offenders from attending, all attendees would have to be screened for sex-offenses and some cons would lose key staff.
That's a pretty weak justification, at least in the US arrest and conviction records are generally a matter of public record. Alternatively, if they wanted to be really thorough, they could easily roll a background check into the ticket price. As for losing staff, you could always bring in outside consultants to replace them.
 
The only way fur-cons could work around this is to rewrite the convention rule book banning sex-offenders from attending, all attendees would have to be screened for sex-offenses and some cons would lose key staff.
Level one: Guns and bombs.
Level two: Murrsuit and drugs.
Level three: STDs.
Level four: Political orientation.
Level five: Telegram group membership.

"Welcome to the 'it's not a fetish' furcon!"
 
Sex offenders are not a protected class, as far as I'm aware. And the sex offender registry is a matter of public record. Some states even make it nice and easy by broadcasting sex offender status on driver's licenses and IDs. This doesn't help if someone isn't on the registry, but it's honestly not hard to bounce names from one list off another list. And since the registration systems are pretty much custom built anymore, they can probably have a feature added to run names off a sex offender registry and flag the registration if there's a match.
 
That's a pretty weak justification, at least in the US arrrest and conviction records are generally a matter of public record. Slternatively, if they wanted to be really thorough, they could easily roll background check into the ticket price. As for losing staff, you could always bring in outside consultants to replace them.

Things work differently in the UK sex-offender data is not easily accessible without having to jump through hoops to get information.

There's red tape involved in doing DBS checks and tight controls on who and why the checks are needed, con-staff working with under 18's could have DBS checks but regular con-goers would most likely not be allowed to be checked.
 
The only way fur-cons could work around this is to rewrite the convention rule book banning sex-offenders from attending, all attendees would have to be screened for sex-offenses and some cons would lose key staff.

Growly is totally known and notorious. They wouldn't have to rewrite shit, just tell him to stay the fuck away.

They're just a bunch of pedofriendly scumbags is what they are.
 
SonicFox won esports player of the year or some shit at The Game Awards; continues to yabber on for about a minute, starting off by giggling like an idiot with his fursuit head on, saying 'shit', and then being told to wrap it up by the teleprompter. Oh, and he had to round off saying "I'm a gay black furry" for some reason.

He seemed to be able to carry the ego well cause, as he said, he just "likes to play games". It has taken a massive turn and he's just showing off at this point. Somehow, this lack of professionalism and shooting the fandom in the foot, is cool to twitter.
Untitled-1.png
x.PNG
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole