As some dude with first-hand experience said in here; pups belong in neither the rubber, bdsm or furry fandom. They're disgusting and fit no traditional means. I could understand it if it was a subgenre of latex play; animal motives/behavior, but they push it as some sort of furry lifestyle. "it's who I am".
Please tell me the parent of that small child punched this kink geared man after the photo. I can't imagine how anyone can say the fandom isn't all crazed sex offenders. In this case you need to think of the small children.
They have the same "VALIDATE US DAMNIT" thing as babyfurs where they'll throw themselves at your face constantly trying to get respect they don't deserve to have.
Some furries do think of the children, which is part of the problem.
>claims to be a pedo
Troll shielding
Want my dox? 1801 S 10th St, McAllen, TX 78503
Rather shocked nobody posted it yet, but here is Violent J's fursuit.
Weird, innit.
Rather shocked nobody posted it yet, but here is Violent J's fursuit.
Weird, innit.
It's certainly well made, not that mongoloid-looking crosseyed cartoon design most fursuits have.
An idiot. At least half of Animal control’s regulars yiff in hell, but you don’t see us bragging about it.
It’s pretty much an unspoken truth that this subforum (Animal Control) was essentially composed of mostly furfags. When the zoosadist thing blew up an influx of uncreative people not reading the “don’t lament about the fandom” rule in here mucking up threads with uncreative and unfunny posts that did nothing but farm positive ratings from their ilk who otherwise don’t give a shit about furry drama being entertaining. When you talk drama and shit about any community, the first people to take an interest to it are half the time the people it’s about, who are also probably the ones that started the talks in the first place.
