🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon, alleged rapist and revenge pornographer. Exiled in Mexico carlesss on a diet of slop. Has triple titties. Wanted to fuck Keffals' moobs.

[Liquid Cool]

This upcoming article needs to be Koh's magnum opus.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

YouTube is apparently refunding all $25,000 raised for St. Jude's Children's Hospital raised by the #Healstream a few weeks ago.

Wyświetl załącznik 582668 Wyświetl załącznik 582669 Wyświetl załącznik 582670

This is shaping up to be the singular worst Public Relations catastrophe for the Wall Street Journal of all time.

 

[Ruin]

Do any of you autists really think that fat idiot Ralph is going to take down the Wall Street Journal?

 

[Liquid Cool]

Holy fucking shit this is the next level. Fuck gamergate 2, fuck getting matt on Tucker

We need to get fuckin Ralph or something on Tucker to talk about the wall street journal taking money from a children's cancer charity to own the right
that shit would actually be hillarious

"Hold on Tucker, I have to read some superchats. DirtyDDisagrees says for Fourtenn dollars and eighty-eight cents..."

 

[Bob Barker]

Do any of you autists really think that fat idiot Ralph is going to take down the Wall Street Journal?

No but this is ammo for everyone else with a beef with the WSJ to use against them.

Ralph doesn't have the reach, but pewdiepie, keemstar, Tucker Carlson, have a much larger reach and if they get involved they could so some real serious damage.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

"Hold on Tucker, I have to read some superchats. DirtyDDisagrees says for Fourtenn dollars and eighty-eight cents..."

You say this like it wouldn't be the most fantastic thing of all time

 

[PREACHERGOKU]

Do any of you autists really think that fat idiot Ralph is going to take down the Wall Street Journal?

Of course not, this is just another shit show for me but I do think if played right it could become an even bigger shit show. Pewdiepie is for sure going to make a video on this since he hates WSJ already.

 

[ResidentHousepet]

Spoiler: Lots'o Comments Archive

http://archive.fo/dySIE (Not a full archive capture because twitter and first time trying to archive like a newfag)

 

[1Tonka_Truck]

We need to get fuckin Ralph or something on Tucker to talk about the wall street journal taking money from a children's cancer charity to own the right
that shit would actually be hillarious

WSJ and Fox News have the same parent company. I don't think tucker is gonna talk about this shitshow.

 

[BlueSpark]

And so on.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

I didn't think it could get this low down. I hope the fuckers get what's coming to them in the end. I'm legit disgusted.

 

[Superman93]

Someone edit the guy screaming with Ralphs face and the guy sitting down that bitch reporter's face

 

[Ma_Hooty]

Oof

 

[Sheryl Nome]

We now live in a world where Ralph the alt right retard has done more for free speech activists than Sarg'n of applebees

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

Ah, I love a twofer. WSJ for being... well... WSJ and Google for essentially colluding with them

 

[HarblMcDavid]

This could have been a mostly nothing if they just deplatformed ralph for a few months. It's still blatant political deplatforming by a crooked corporation pushing an agenda but that still stays at an internet drama level of happening, maybe some articles on less influential right leaning platforms but that's it.

Problem is, now you took 27k in St Jude donations from very ill kids who do actually need that money. It's uh...kinda hard to justify that even if that's 27k of 14.88 chats that address the topic of heeb removal, it's for fucking charity and almost everyone knows what St. Jude is and what they do. That gave mainstream coverage an in that simply wasn't fucking there before.

 

[thebonesauce]

I mean, it’s one thing to silence someone on YouTube.

It’s another entirely to take $27k away from sick and dying children for health care and research.

 

[Secret Asshole]

The hastag got shadowbanned instantly from the Trending section.

Fucking hilarious.

Of course it would be.

Of course not, this is just another shit show for me but I do think if played right it could become an even bigger shit show. Pewdiepie is for sure going to make a video on this since he hates WSJ already.

He's not going to take down the WSJ, but this looks fucking terrible for progressives. Anyone can understand this, its a relatively simple story: Media with progressive politics puts pressure on charity to rescind donations from conservatives. Nobody is going to take their side besides die-hard re.tarded soyboys and progtards.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=OGp9P6QvMjY

I firmly believe that getting the donations of children's hospitals cancelled and refunded over petty politics and internet drama is morally abominable and ethically atrocious.

Keep in mind that this is a hard and controversial stance gleaned only from rigorous research and internal debate on my own end.

You may give positive ratings now.

 

[Sonork]

Federal crimes. Well yeah, sure, of course not.

But criminal law provides its own, separate protections for the defense. Like they have to prove intent with most serious crimes. Youtube can't get in hot water criminally for unknowingly hosting ISIS material either.

I know, that's why i was talking about someone who is actively moderating a forum and allowing ISIS to post videos. Providing material support (including services) with knowledge that they're being used to facilitate terorism is a federal crime and you can't say well, I didn't post it, they were just posting it on my forum and I allowed it and did nothing to remove it. That would be ridiculous.