Reading through his filings a few things stand out, which exemplify why he will never work as a paralegal again. He keeps on reiterating that the Utah small claims court has certain procedural rules which are included within the relevant codes. However he keeps on stating that he wanted to take certain actions during his small claims procedure that would go against the code, subsequently they were not allowed by the presiding judge. The interesting thing is how Russell then saw these incidents and I believe it is one of the clear insights into his mind and his mentality, according to Russell the fact that he was not allowed to take certain actions contrary to the relevant codes means that the judge was biased and aggressive towards Russell. This shows how narcissistic Russell is and it also shows how he really has no real insight into the law and would never be capable of truly working as a paralegal as he is unwilling to follow simple procedure and believes that these do not apply them, something that would render any paralegal unfit for such a position.
Other than that it seems like he is writing another book than an actual legal filing and is trying to gain sympathy from the judge on the basis of an entire sobstory, none of which really has to do with Taylor Swift. Now I do not know this judge, however I do not believe that this is a good approach to take.
His request for relief over the filing costs seems unlikely to be successful because even by his own account and the numbers he filed he would have over 400 dollars left after each month after his normal costs are deducted from his pay. This means he could easily have saved up for this filing. Although I think it is believable I am shocked that he only has a 100 dollars in his checking account (if true). This all really shows that he puts away all his money for his hooker trips, since after his hooker trip last month he now only has so little in his checking account.
Another thing as I do not use creditcards, but his statement that he needs to pay 100 dollars a month to a credit card company, does this not mean that he is in debt and seemingly a significant amount if he needs to pay a 100 dollar each month?
Overall, it seems to me more likely than not that this case will never see a court room, which is an utter shame.