- Dołączono
- 6 Mar 2017
I dont know whats more sweeter
Niggos/man children flippin out over having to pay the toll or OwO coming back
Niggos/man children flippin out over having to pay the toll or OwO coming back
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
i have high blood pressure therefore im triggeredLike literally just eating popcorn and drinking sweet tea. Sometimes, you need a little sodium chloride in your life, fam.
i have high blood pressure therefore im triggered
156your blood pressure is probably much better than these people on twitter and something awful I'm seeing atm lol.
I remember american medias reporting about the german mittelstand. might be off topic but i think its interesting to read for some context. there are reasons to support the mittelstand, but its of course not simply applicable to the us.Oh no! Poor small businesses. In a digital world where Amazon is already biting at the chops of the brick and mortar shops, how will Mom & Pop sell their quilts now?
I'm confused by this complaint. Obama added $6.5 big-Ts to the debt (which is $200B more than every president before him) in 8 years.Number crunchers are saying this could add as much as 1 trillion dollars to the US National debt over the next six years...
That's $1,000,000,000,000
Damn son; your kids, kids kids will still be making payments on that amount.
What's that got ya'll up to now?
Oh yah a smudge over 20 trillion dollars in debt.
Lol...have fun with that.
Wait wait, I got more...
Debt per citizen: $63,890
Debt per taxpayer: $170'405
Good thing I don't really know how this shit works out cause those numbers are down right insane.
I'm confused by this complaint. Obama added $6.5 big-Ts to the debt (which is $200B more than every president before him) in 8 years.
The problem is when people throw around arbitrary big numbers like that it's really hard to gauge what their actual impact will be, but it doesn't stop dummies from waving it around like it proves their point.
The way I see it, if anyone feels they may get affected, then read the actual legislation and hire/consult a tax professional, instead of crying about it on Twitter/FB.Your interpretation of the bill is almost definitely going to fall in line with wherever you get your news. All I know is that hundreds of thousands of people are now complaining on Twitter about a tax law they didn't read, only got the footnotes from their favorite mouthpieces, and are probably not even paying taxes to begin with.
One such contested change, for instance, is that apparently small businesses will be hurt by removal of itemized deductions, though pro-bill people will claim small businesses don't typically use itemized deductions.
The wonderful Washington Post writes:
"Say goodbye to most deductions. Almost all itemized deductions are going away, except for three. The final House bill keeps the deductions for charitable donations, property taxes up to $10,000 a year and the mortgage interest deduction. The mortgage interest deduction would be capped at $500,000 for mortgages (down from $1 million now)."
Oh no! Poor small businesses. In a digital world where Amazon is already biting at the chops of the brick and mortar shops, how will Mom & Pop sell their quilts now?
Inc.com has a different take.
https://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/stop-panicking-tax-bills-dont-eliminate-your-business-expenses.html
"The problem is that some people in the media, and apparently some business owners, don't realize that there are two ways in which business expenses can be deducted. One is as an expense of a legitimate business. Even a sole-proprietorship can deduct legal fees, a home office, and so on by using the right forms.
"However, there has been another way to deduct business expenses. If you're an employee and incur unreimbursed expenses on the part of your employer, you've been able potentially to deduct them."
So there's a lot of conflicting information and none of the people fucking voting for this shit actually read it. They're just doing what their owners want. The same goes with the dipshits at the WaPo. The only reason why this is breaking news is that it's Trump's thing.
Even worse, Obama bailed out the banks with not even a slap on the hand, despite them possibly being the 1% of the 1%.I'm confused by this complaint. Obama added $6.5 big-Ts to the debt (which is $200B more than every president before him) in 8 years.
The problem is when people throw around arbitrary big numbers like that it's really hard to gauge what their actual impact will be, but it doesn't stop dummies from waving it around like it proves their point.