Las Vegas Mass Shooting - 50 Dead, 200 Injured. Worst Mass Shooting in US History

Who dun it

  • Mudslimes

    Głosy: 78 10,8%
  • Irish Republican Army

    Głosy: 56 7,7%
  • Trannies

    Głosy: 50 6,9%
  • Angry White Guy

    Głosy: 363 50,2%
  • Sam Hyde

    Głosy: 176 24,3%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    723
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Nobody intentionally picks the "wrong" side, you idiot. Even the worst Isis baby rapist thinks they are doing the right thing, and that whoever is on the other end of the spectrum is the one that's really in the wrong. Having a fixed, unwavering belief in any Ideology is exceptional. Being reasonable and able to admit when you are wrong is pretty much the only thing that's is going to save this toilet of a world.
I'm probably a bad communicator, because I wasn't saying that you should stick to an ideology. I'm saying that, for example, if violence is wrong, it doesn't matter who is perpetrating it - it's still wrong. So you don't go 'centrist' between them, you go directly to the other side, which is non-violence. Sorry if I'm being dumb here.
 
the only way this works is if you think one side is evil and the other good. Truth is there are good ideas and bad ideas on both sides. Centrists want to borrow the good from both and get rid of the bad. If you think one side is evil then you are likely an extremist yourself.
That's exactly my point. It's about ideas, not sides.
Edit: Sorry for double posting. :(
 
I think we have a new candidate for the most retarded thing said about this shooting.

full mcintosh vegas edition.PNG
 
I seem to remember that point being made in about half the episodes of CSI ever.

What I'm getting from the rest of the thread is that the guy basically had some sort of really heavy duty automatic weapon, possibly an Armalite rifle, and that "gun control" is a bit of a bogus point here because those things actually are controlled or at least really difficult to get hold of. Am I reading this right?

From what's being reported on the news here, he had multiple weapons in the room with him and didn't need to reload, only switch weapons.
 
Is it possible he just went full exceptional over dem dirty rednecks ruining muh gambling experience?

If he was considered a "vip" on the strip, it's likely he knows the other vips. VIPs who blow their winnings on shit like expensive guns and still have enough to be a high roller.

Take dan bilzerian for instance. That dudes a high profile gambler and he's got a fucking armory.
 
shit like this makes it all too easy to see the fucking vultures of ideology coming over to rip at the carcass to their own needs.
hell world
 
clearly, the obvious solution to this is to ban guns. that's always worked. surely they couldnt just get guns from a black market dealer and/or use any other weapon in order to kill someone. its not like people in the past have killed each other with things other than guns
 
I think we have a new candidate for the most exceptional thing said about this shooting.

Wyświetl załącznik 289634

The only reason why Jonathan doesn't know of female mass murderers is because 1) he didn't bother doing any research as usual and 2) when a woman decides to murder a lot of people they don't often use guns. They'll use things like knives, poison, gas, and vehicles. Depending on the country, also suicide vests.
 
The only reason why Jonathan doesn't know of female mass murderers is because 1) he didn't bother doing any research as usual and 2) when a woman decides to murder a lot of people they don't often use guns. They'll use things like knives, poison, gas, and vehicles. Depending on the country, also suicide vests.

The most successful mass murdering women in history were nurses.
 
HAHAHAHAHA. what a fucking great thing to wake up to

i was invited to fly down and see this concert with some co-workers but was too cheap to dish out money for tickets + vacation shit

this feels so fucking unreal
 
The only reason why Jonathan doesn't know of female mass murderers is because 1) he didn't bother doing any research as usual and 2) when a woman decides to murder a lot of people they don't often use guns. They'll use things like knives, poison, gas, and vehicles. Depending on the country, also suicide vests.

Joshy Macintoshy thinks that ALL violence comes from toxic masculinity, a stance which probably comes from his constant guilt over his gender, race, and economic privilege.

I've always wanted to ask him if ANTIFA's violence was also toxic masculinity, but I'm sure he'd just block me and embrace cognitive dissonance once again.
 
I'm probably a bad communicator, because I wasn't saying that you should stick to an ideology. I'm saying that, for example, if violence is wrong, it doesn't matter who is perpetrating it - it's still wrong. So you don't go 'centrist' between them, you go directly to the other side, which is non-violence. Sorry if I'm being dumb here.
Centrists are not centrists on every topic under the sun. They are centrist in US politics. You know, they want to take good ideas from both Dems and Repubs and get rid of the dumb shit. As a centrist I am not wishy washy on violence or racism. I condemn both, unless its against furries.
 
No way a white dude firing into a country music festival isn't a mentally ill socialist.

Especially since his current girlfriend is Asian and is a huge lefty herself. Oh and let’s not even mention the fact that she’s in an open poly relationship with him

There’s no way a far-right white nationalist would go ahead and start shooting up a fucking country music festival so it’s either some far-left commie shit, a Muslim convert, mental illness or a mix of two or three of these
 
This is a really fascinating case. I'm a criminology buff, and I've haven't heard of a mass murder quite like this. First off, most mass murderers/shooters are young (or relatively young) men; Stephen Paddock was 64 years old. Most mass murderers leave behind some kind of manifesto or document explaining their motivations; from what I can tell, Stephen Paddock didn't leave behind any kind of detailed explanation (if he did, it would have mentioned by now). He also attacked from a vantage point, which while not unheard of (Charles Whitman is one of the most infamous examples) is still pretty unusual. Most mass murderers prefer to be up close and personal with their victims.

He also wasn't poor or anything either, but the one photo Marylou has with him (that's the photo journalists have been running with) he doesn't seem happy so some sort of depression I'm guessing, but Marylou was in pretty good spirits in that photo.
Joshy Macintoshy thinks that ALL violence comes from toxic masculinity, a stance which probably comes from his constant guilt over his gender, race, and economic privilege.

I've always wanted to ask him if ANTIFA's violence was also toxic masculinity, but I'm sure he'd just block me and embrace cognitive dissonance once again.

Back when I used Twitter each my accounts were autoblocked by him, including the account that lasted 10 minutes.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
>apparently wasn't a gun guy
>yet managed to acquire an illegal weapon, despite no previous criminal activities.
>despite not being a gun guy, managed to hit moving targets 12 football fields away
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole