- Dołączono
- 9 Sty 2020
I think you're missing the entire point or you are ignorant of the information. You should trust the testimony. There is plenty of it BEFORE the submersible imploded. Stockton has been shown to have legally hounded and destroyed legally and professionally anyone outside or within his company who questioned his hull. This has been extensively covered and documented. There was a chorus of people within the company that tried to steer him straight and were professionally destroyed by Stockton. They outright claimed death was imminent if he wasn't stoped. They were dead right. And a chorus of companies said so - before the implosion.On the bright side, Oceangate did make 2 major scientific and engineering discoveries that will forever change the field of submersibles:
1) They proved that a carbon fiber hull can survive multiple dives. Previous attempts to build something like the Titan were abandoned due to the belief that they could only survive one dive.
2) They proved you could fuck up every step of the construction of a carbon fiber submersible and it would still somehow survive a dozen trips to the Titanic.
I wouldn't trust the testimonies of former engineers and employees due to the fact that they could've been responsible for the problems wile laying all the blame on their boss. Also, everyone bitching about the lack of testing need to accept that it wasn't just Oceangate that is to blame: a lot of the testing would've required help from 3rd parties and universitites and those places told Oceangate to fuck off. So you can't lay all the blame on the CEO who literally went down with the ship.
Companies that evaluated the design CLEARLY EXPRESSED that it was NOT to be taken to the depths it was asked to do so and were entirely unambiguous as to their statements that this design was NEVER to be taken to those depths. Period. No exceptions.
The blame lays solely on Stockton and the Directors who allowed him to pursue the destruction of anyone who questioned his approach, and this hull design.
It is true his carbon fiber hull did impressively make repeated depth dives to the Titanic; but these are not discoveries. Anyone could have told you a carbon fiber hull could make it to the Titanic; but Stockton wanted it to be within a weight limit rather than a class that could actually do the job. He reversed engineered the problem "It needs to weigh this" and bullshitted everything about it to justify the thickness, rather than build it to suit. Worse, he also designed a Hull that when it expressed fatigue, could not actually be remedied, nor could it accurately be predicted when failure would happen. This by and large means his design is a life gamble every time and that is just unacceptable. For this reason, carbon fiber hulls like this are not deployed because unlike with metals that you can control the casting, composition and accurately predict failure, carbon fiber by virtue of it's production method can be subject to variations.