UK Migrant care workers bring dozens of family members despite curbs - 😭 15 for every worker!

Archive / Original(🔒)

Migrant workers are still bringing in family members at a ratio as high as 15 for every worker despite new restrictions, according to Home Office figures.

Just 12 health and care workers from Cameroon sponsored a total of 180 family members to join them in Britain in the year to March, in statistics branded “shocking” by the Conservatives.

Ghanaian health and care workers brought on average more than eight family members, known as dependants, in the same period, as 2,131 joined only 257 workers.

Bangladeshis brought on average more than five dependants (139 workers joined by 747 family members), and Indians more than four (2,395 joined by 10,504).

The Home Office barred care workers from bringing family members in March 2024, and last year it extended the ban to all migrant workers unless they had a job at degree level or above.

However, those who were already here before the restrictions were introduced can still bring dependants to the UK.

Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, has used the figures to announce a new Conservative policy that would extend the ban on dependants to care workers already in the country.

He said: “These shocking figures show far too many family members, including the family of people working in kebab shops and vape stores, are being let into the UK. The number of dependants is unacceptably high, the burden of supporting them all too often falls on the British taxpayer. Worker visas should not be a route to let in thousands more family members. It is an abuse of the system.

“Far too many people entered the UK on social care visas and the previous Conservative government [was] right to put a stop to it. But today’s revelations show those already here on social care visas are still bringing in large numbers [of] dependants. This must be urgently stopped.

“Social care workers already here should not be able to receive new visas for new dependants. We have seen hundreds of thousands of dependants of care workers come here, more than the number of actual care workers, and this must now urgently stop.”

There were also high ratios among migrant worker groups more generally. A total of 1,029 skilled worker visas were issued to Pakistanis, who brought in 6,155 dependants — six for every worker. Nigerians had nearly five times as many dependants as main applicants — 1,114 family members joining 230 workers on skilled worker visas.

Members of UNISON rally at Parliament Square with signs supporting "Fair Visas" for migrant health and social care workers.
Unison members have called for fairer visas for health and social care workers
The average ratio was 1.3 dependants for every worker. Europeans issued with skilled worker visas brought in significantly less than one family member each. French workers were one of the main European recipients of such visas and in the last year 1,804 workers brought in 701 family members — a ratio of 0.4 for each worker.

Research by the migration advisory committee, which advises the Home Office on immigration policy, found that migrants arriving on skilled worker visas — including health and care workers — were more likely to stay in Britain than previously. Some 85 per cent of migrants who arrived in 2019 stayed for at least five years, compared with 74 per cent of those who arrived in 2014.

Most migrants granted right to stay under ECHR are unemployed
Migrants from wealthier countries are less likely to stay long term, while those from Africa, southern Asia and non-EU European countries had the highest rates of long-term stay.

The higher “stay rates” have increased the likelihood of migrant workers obtaining indefinite leave to remain, which grants the right for foreign workers to live, work, study and claim benefits in Britain permanently.

This has been one of the factors that has led the government to announce new “earned settlement” rules that will double the time it takes to qualify for settlement from five to ten years, with opportunities for migrants to “earn” settlement earlier if they work in public sector roles, highly paid jobs or contribute to society through volunteering.

However, the government is under pressure to drop plans to apply the new rules to an estimated 1.6 million migrants already in the UK.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood speaking at a podium during an Eid reception.
Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary
Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, is considering a range of “transitional arrangements” which could soften the impact of the changes on migrants already here, including an option to exempt hundreds of thousands of care workers.

The Home Office said: “We have taken significant action to reduce the number of dependants joining workers in the UK, steps which have contributed to overall net migration falling by 82 per cent in just three years.

“This has included restricting dependants for all occupations below degree-level, increasing language requirements and ending overseas recruitment for care workers.

“Visa numbers for foreign workers are down 50 per cent from their peak in 2023 as these reforms take effect, and we will double the route to settlement from five to ten years, ensuring it is earned through contribution and integration.”
 
The hidden cost of every migrant, is the extended family they bring in with reunification programs. It's why a boat of a "100" is so bullshit because behind every one of those men that is accepted(I think around 60%), is their parents, their wife's and her parents, their brothers and sisters, and their children and spouses(do they allow for siblings?).

Even with the care worker this case it's egregious. the gov has a shortage of care workers, they bring one, then said care worker brings in her/his family, likely including near elderly parents, and so that one worker becomes a null, because you now have increased the dependents, so you court for more migrants and the cycle repeats. Migration the more you read, is pure insanity.
 
That's the moderate position. I'm just not sure it can be afforded in this economy.
If the more extreme method has to be done, you better hope the right side wins. Because it will be held above everyone's head for all of eternity otherwise if the progs/marxists win.
 
If the more extreme method has to be done, you better hope the right side wins. Because it will be held above everyone's head for all of eternity otherwise if the progs/marxists win.
All will be eligible for Indefinite Leave To Remain, and thus benefits, and sponsoring even more family coming over.
Right now dependents have freedom to work, without the industry or hours restriction of their sponsor.

After ILTR, the "care workers" would stop being careworkers, but vote for more people to immigrate here to care for their elderly parents. I'm still jetlagged, but I don't regret stepping away. Reform/Labour/Cons won't fix this.
 
You see 15 extra people for every one and you see leeches. The Bank of London sees those people as extra loan applicants that boost the line for this quarter.

Who do you think Parliament is going to listen to?
 
Because it will be held above everyone's head for all of eternity otherwise if the progs/marxists win.
I've already seen what happens if they win. Mr. Stalin, Mr. Dong, and Mr. Pot were kind enough to show us. They rather dislike any threat to their power. Gulags are for the intelligentsia, not the proles. Proles just starve to death out of sheer indifference and a desire to acquire foreign currency. You know you're poor in a communist regime when the secret police don't ask you for papers.
 
Headline reminds me of how over here in Burgerland, I've never seen people from India travel solo. Seems I always see them travel in odd and maybe multi-generational groups.

Western-style dating:

A boyfriend and girlfriend go somewhere nice alone, just the 2 of them.

India-style "dating":

Arranged marriage couple travels in a group of 16 with both of their parents, the guy's brother, two random uncles, one of their aunts and her husband, and that aunt's kids?
 
You see 15 extra people for every one and you see leeches. The Bank of London sees those people as extra loan applicants that boost the line for this quarter.

Who do you think Parliament is going to listen to?

"You mean 15 pieces of extra voting cattle, per new voter?":feels:
"You mean 15 more benny applicants to process per benny applicant?":feels:
"You mean 15 more rentoids to milk per single-bedroom unit?":feels:
And most importantly:
"You mean 15 more people applying to get their uncles and cousins in through their own right to family reunification":feels:
 
How do you expect some poor immigrant to come here to work a low skilled job while getting free accommodation, discounted travel, benefit payments and free medical if they can't have their 15 person support system with them?

SHAME ON YOU!
 
But they won't. They'll become the new "British" people.
Have any people contributed to modern human progress per capita more than the British?
The British don't deserve to end up like dodos.
Seems I always see them travel in odd and maybe multi-generational groups.
I lived in a shared flat with a Indian woman. She was literally on the phone a clear majority of the time she was home.
You can't vote your way out of this shit. There is only avenue of correcting the issue.
Not for long, the army is recruiting from Nigeria now. Modern day Scythian Archers.
Maybe if Restore win, the nation has a chance, but they're currently polling at 4% nationally.
 
All societal leeches should be shot. That coincidentally means all migrants, how convenient
 
Have any people contributed to modern human progress per capita more than the British?
The British don't deserve to end up like dodos.
They don't deserve it unless they let it happen around them. And they're probably going to let it happen.

The northern Irish gave me momentary hope the country would burn in righteous flames, but... the Britoids just don't have the fire in them anymore, I don't think.

But I hope they'll prove me wrong.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole