- Dołączono
- 4 Lip 2022
It's the bongoloid King, sausage finger Charles.royal commission? What do they have an abo king or something in vegemite land?
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
It's the bongoloid King, sausage finger Charles.royal commission? What do they have an abo king or something in vegemite land?
>mass shooting in BuffaloA mass shooting in Buffalo, New York? That's not even Orwellian bullshit, not even Kafkaesque bullshit, it's down right Pythonesque bullshit.
We know, they're heebs.This is only the tip
how dare the kiwifarms inspire such terrorism in other countriesFor context, they're doing this because a few muzzies went down to Bondi Beach and shot a dozen or so jews last December. Yes, because that's all our fault, not the islamic terrorists they're letting into the country.
It means something has them spooked.the fact this isnt even about antisemitism this time makes it worse, the agency responsible for social cohesion is the one in charge of antisemitism as well. why? jews are a miniscule part of the population. less than one percent in aussie land. the fuck is purging less than one percent of the population going to do to social cohesion? normally nothing, if the social fabric is designed around them everything. why is the agency trying to say josh is indecent for displaying a mass shooting against non jewish white people also dual focused on one particular insignificant minority? how can people say jews dont have too much power when this exists.
im sure the bad goy subordination and punishment commission and orwellian compliance office just wanted a fair hearing, just like how their pm fairly objects to white statehood while jerking off the yidsraeli ethnic supremacy and genocide projects.I'm not sure what the issue is here. The Royal Commission is advising that the documents provided by the eSafety Commissioner are relevant to the website, and giving the opportunity to object to their publication. Where's the problem?
If anything, the Royal Commission may have been an opportunity for Lolcow LLC to submit that the eSafety Commissioner is harming social cohesion by attempting to police the internet. Alas, submissions are now closed.
We write to advise that the Royal Commission has sought the views of the eSafety Commissioner regarding the disclosure of certain documents to parties with leave to appear in Hearing Block 3 (HB3). Some of the documents identified by the Royal Commission involve material that is relevant to Kiwi Farms. A copy of that document is attached.
If Kiwi Farms objects to the disclosure of such documents to the parties with leave to appear at the Royal Commission hearings, or publication of such documents, Kiwi Farms may contact the Royal Commission by email to the Solicitors Assisting at ASCRC.SolicitorsAssissting@royalcommission.gov.au by 12:00PM tomorrow, 2 July 2026.
We will shortly inform the Royal Commission that we have notified you, and requested that you contact the Royal Commission by 12:00PM tomorrow, 2 July 2026 if you have any objections.
DEY MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOE DI PRIVY COUNCIL AND DI GOVERNOR GENERAL WHO REPRESENTS THE SOVEREIGN OI FINKRoyal Commission
Enlighten us, then. By context it's appears to be some agency of beurocratic busybodies operating well beyond their jurisdiction. By what authority is an American media company beholden to the Australian government?Reading through the rest of the thread it's plainly obvious that no-one posting even knows what a Royal Commission is or does.
Reading through the rest of the thread it's plainly obvious that no-one posting even knows what a Royal Commission is or does.
As an American, I have no need to know, so I dont. Could be reccomending the worst beans to put on toast for all I care.Reading through the rest of the thread it's plainly obvious that no-one posting even knows what a Royal Commission is or does.