2026-07-01 - Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion: Disclosure of document

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
A mass shooting in Buffalo, New York? That's not even Orwellian bullshit, not even Kafkaesque bullshit, it's down right Pythonesque bullshit.
>mass shooting in Buffalo
>Josh used to live in Buffalo
>website is bad, frequented by bad people


Obviously, Josh is the ringleader of a killer cult but they just can't prove it yet. Australia's clay will be stained red by the time they have the evidence
 
the fact this isnt even about antisemitism this time makes it worse, the agency responsible for social cohesion is the one in charge of antisemitism as well. why? jews are a miniscule part of the population. less than one percent in aussie land. the fuck is purging less than one percent of the population going to do to social cohesion? normally nothing, if the social fabric is designed around them everything. why is the agency trying to say josh is indecent for displaying a mass shooting against non jewish white people also dual focused on one particular insignificant minority? how can people say jews dont have too much power when this exists.
 
the fact this isnt even about antisemitism this time makes it worse, the agency responsible for social cohesion is the one in charge of antisemitism as well. why? jews are a miniscule part of the population. less than one percent in aussie land. the fuck is purging less than one percent of the population going to do to social cohesion? normally nothing, if the social fabric is designed around them everything. why is the agency trying to say josh is indecent for displaying a mass shooting against non jewish white people also dual focused on one particular insignificant minority? how can people say jews dont have too much power when this exists.
It means something has them spooked.
 
I'm not sure what the issue is here. The Royal Commission is advising that the documents provided by the eSafety Commissioner - which are the ones referred to in this thread - are relevant to the website, and giving the opportunity for Lolcow LLC to object to their publication. Royal Commissions are essentially independent panels that explore a problem within the remit they are given. They don't have any enforcement powers, and are not at all trying to do what the eSafety Commissioner tried to do. This solicitor has made contact so that there is a fair opportunity for the subject of these documents to object to their publication. Where's the problem?

If anything, the Royal Commission may have been an opportunity for Lolcow LLC to submit that the eSafety Commissioner is harming social cohesion by attempting to police the internet. Alas, submissions are now closed.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
It's not antisemetism to suggest Israel is a fake, parasitic country leeching off the goodwill and money of the United states while screwing the american people over through its degenerate pedophilic lifestyles and its creation of actual muslim terrorists through copius amounts of funding to create a "boogeyman" for us to waste money over. It's also not Antisemetism to suggest that if Israel is wiped off the map, everyone, including the western world will benefit.
 
I'm not sure what the issue is here. The Royal Commission is advising that the documents provided by the eSafety Commissioner are relevant to the website, and giving the opportunity to object to their publication. Where's the problem?

If anything, the Royal Commission may have been an opportunity for Lolcow LLC to submit that the eSafety Commissioner is harming social cohesion by attempting to police the internet. Alas, submissions are now closed.
im sure the bad goy subordination and punishment commission and orwellian compliance office just wanted a fair hearing, just like how their pm fairly objects to white statehood while jerking off the yidsraeli ethnic supremacy and genocide projects.
 
The ability to send these emails should be paywalled. You want to inform me of your Australian homosexuality? Pay a $100 fee to get your message to my inbox and maybe my eyes will see it.
 
We write to advise that the Royal Commission has sought the views of the eSafety Commissioner regarding the disclosure of certain documents to parties with leave to appear in Hearing Block 3 (HB3). Some of the documents identified by the Royal Commission involve material that is relevant to Kiwi Farms. A copy of that document is attached.

If Kiwi Farms objects to the disclosure of such documents to the parties with leave to appear at the Royal Commission hearings, or publication of such documents, Kiwi Farms may contact the Royal Commission by email to the Solicitors Assisting at ASCRC.SolicitorsAssissting@royalcommission.gov.au by 12:00PM tomorrow, 2 July 2026.

We will shortly inform the Royal Commission that we have notified you, and requested that you contact the Royal Commission by 12:00PM tomorrow, 2 July 2026 if you have any objections.

"You literally have until tomorrow to respond electronically."

Welp Kangaroo Courts on the right continent I guess?!

Also lol at July 2nd. Our official vote to break off from Britain was July 2nd, the Lee Resolution. Declaration of Independence was on the 4th.

The irony is rich and palpable.

In conclusion:

Stralyans tongue my anus, Charlotte.
 
it’s a shame Null is a grown up with tasteful retorts because every single one of these people deserve to get hit by a full blown stalker child response
 
Royal Commission
DEY MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOE DI PRIVY COUNCIL AND DI GOVERNOR GENERAL WHO REPRESENTS THE SOVEREIGN OI FINK

enlighten us plebs, please

one thing is certain, this is yet another example of motivated actors attempting to crystallize precedent?

and it's tiring to see the crown seek to exercise censorship via its own kangaroo courts

the idea being, one of these will eventually stick or trigger a "newsworthy" action

(ie a disgruntled kiwi takes the bait and does big crimes in the name of freeze peach gossip nigger forum)

which precipitates the next cycle, as the feedback loop of attention does its thang

ad infinitum ad absurdum

nice response, though from the nullster

BIGUPS RASCLAT BUMBOCLAT
 
Reading through the rest of the thread it's plainly obvious that no-one posting even knows what a Royal Commission is or does.
Enlighten us, then. By context it's appears to be some agency of beurocratic busybodies operating well beyond their jurisdiction. By what authority is an American media company beholden to the Australian government?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole