US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
I don't think that is a bad thing. Trump's relationship with Bibi is a little too close and it definitely makes some of Trump's foreign policy choices feel more MIGA than MAGA because of it. He isn't going to stop supporting Israel, but having a guy that he can't build a personal relationship with will help keep the relationship between our countries more professional for lack of a better term.
On at least one occasion trump told sara to keep bibi's ass in line.

1782436986408.png

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...etanyahu-through-his-wife-over-lebanon-plans/

probably a bit too familiar with each other if you tell dude's wife (who he cheated on) to keep his bitch ass sane.
 
TLDR: Some judge in DC said that the Po-Po can't expect niggers to act like a normal human beings and thus you have to give them special exceptions during interactions. This nigger was walking around with a stolen gun shoved down his pants and when cops saw the gun shaped bulge they asked to search him, he said OK and they found the gun. The judge said "a Black Man wouldn't have the confidence to say no to Law Enforcement due to historcial and cultural racism but a white person would and thus the search is illegal" she then threw out the case as without the search there is no evidence. The DA appealed it beceause...fuck that noise, but the SCOTUS declined to take up the case so this nigger walks to get arrested next week for some other shit.
You forget this part where the police goon squad jumped out and told everyone on the street they were checking for firearms, cornered this one guy, kept telling him to show his waistband despite already showing it twice and denying he had a gun, and then when he pulled up his pants, suddenly decided he had a gun on him.

Mind you, even under the laws of Washington D.C., there is no legal duty to inform the police you are carrying a gun unless they have you lawfully detained on reasonable suspicion that you have committed a crime.

And no the cops believing you have a gun on you isn't reasonable suspicion, the neighboring Third Circuit and Fourth Circuit already ruled that detaining someone merely for having a gun is unconstitutional.

United States v. Black, 707 F.3d 531 (4th Cir. 2013) - Where a state permits open carry, the exercise of that right, without more, cannot justify an investigatory detention ... Where a person has exercised his right to carry a firearm openly, the possibility that he may also be a felon does not eliminate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Being a felon in possession of a firearm is not the default status. Permitting such a justification would eviscerate Fourth Amendment protections for lawfully armed individuals in those states.
Facts of this Case: The police detained and started searching everyone in a group for guns because one member of the group was lawfully open carrying a pistol.

United States v. Ubiles, 224 F.3d 213 (3d Cir. 2000) - A mere allegation that a suspect possesses a firearm... does not justify an officer in stopping a suspect absent reasonable suspicion... For all the officers knew... Ubiles was another celebrant lawfully exercising his right under Virgin Islands law to possess a gun in public... This situation is no different than if the informant had told the police that Ubiles possessed a wallet, a perfectly legal act in the Virgin Islands.
Facts of this Case: The police got a report that a guy had a gun on him, just that, didn't say he was waving it around or anything, just that he had a gun on his person, then stopped and searched him on that basis alone.

So good for him getting the case thrown out, what the cops did was objectively bullshit.
 
Kiwi reports in the field.
Reflection pool is reflective.
Retarded pro algae protesters are here lamenting the pond is now scum, but also that the algae is dead.
Wyświetl załącznik 9193527
Ding dong the algae’s dead
What algae
The bad algae
Ding dong the bad algae is dead


1782439129636.png
AI summarry:
a study led by researchers at the University of Texas at Austin and Stanford University indicates that Russia is likely testing a satellite-based system capable of causing continental-scale GPS blackouts. By analyzing data from global navigation satellite system (GNSS) monitoring stations, the team identified 75 days of simultaneous, high-powered interference across Europe, Greenland, and Canada between 2019 and 2026.

Forensic analysis of the signal timing pinpointed the source to Kosmos 2546, a Russian military satellite in the EKS early-warning constellation, which operates in highly elliptical Molniya orbits. The interference bursts are short (under 10 seconds), occur during business hours on weekdays, and target frequencies slightly offset from the standard GPS L1 band. Lead researcher Todd Humphreys suggests these are deliberate tests of electronic warfare capabilities, potentially designed to degrade navigation systems without immediately triggering full-scale conflict detection.

While the Russian Embassy declined to comment and some experts remain skeptical about the intent, the findings highlight a significant escalation in space-based electronic warfare. The system appears to selectively disrupt GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou signals while leaving Russia’s own GLONASS system unaffected, raising concerns about the potential for future, more damaging disruptions during geopolitical conflicts.

A continental-scale GPS blackout caused by satellite-based interference would be catastrophic, triggering immediate chaos in transportation and a cascading collapse of critical infrastructure. Unlike localized ground jamming, a space-based source like the Kosmos 2546 satellite can disrupt signals across entire continents simultaneously, leaving no safe corridor for aviation or shipping.

Immediate Transportation Collapse​

The most visible impact would be the grounding of global aviation and the paralysis of maritime shipping. Modern air traffic control relies heavily on GPS-based ADS-B systems; without them, airspace capacity would drop by roughly 15–40%, forcing authorities to ground non-essential flights to prevent mid-air collisions. Similarly, 90% of global trade moves by sea, and large container ships depend on GNSS for navigation in narrow straits and automated docking. A blackout would likely cause port congestion, shipping delays, and a heightened risk of collisions, with estimated economic losses in affected regions reaching $8–10 million per day for the maritime sector alone.

Critical Infrastructure and Financial Meltdown​

Beyond navigation, the precise timing provided by GPS is the invisible heartbeat of the global economy. Financial markets use these nanosecond-accurate timestamps to verify high-frequency trades; a loss of synchronization would force stock exchanges to close and could freeze banking systems. The energy sector also relies on GPS timing to synchronize power grids; disruptions could lead to phase drift, causing widespread blackouts and potential hardware damage. Telecommunications networks would suffer degraded throughput, impacting internet and mobile services.

Economic Magnitude​

Studies estimate that a total loss of GPS service in the United States alone would cost the economy approximately $1 billion to $1.6 billion per day. Over a 30-day period, damages could exceed $30 billion, with the agriculture sector facing up to $15 billion in losses if the outage occurs during planting season due to the reliance on precision farming equipment. A five-day disruption in the UK was previously estimated to cost £5.2 billion ($7.2 billion), a figure that has likely grown with increased digital dependence.

Strategic Implications​

The current tests by Russia, which involve short bursts (<10 seconds) during business hours, appear to be calibration exercises rather than full-scale attacks. However, they demonstrate a proven capability to blind civilian infrastructure across Europe and North America instantly. If escalated during a conflict, shifting these signals to the primary GPS frequency could cripple Western defense logistics, civilian supply chains, and emergency services simultaneously, creating a "single point of failure" for modern civilization.

I really don't know why they keep poking the bear as Russia just seems to keep inventing new ways to make western civilisation grind to a screeching halt. that being said, it would be nice if the financial bubble popped while I'm still young enough to survive and rebuild my life
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
United States v. Black, 707 F.3d 531 (4th Cir. 2013) - Where a state permits open carry, the exercise of that right, without more, cannot justify an investigatory detention ... Where a person has exercised his right to carry a firearm openly, the possibility that he may also be a felon does not eliminate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Being a felon in possession of a firearm is not the default status. Permitting such a justification would eviscerate Fourth Amendment protections for lawfully armed individuals in those states.
Facts of this Case: The police detained and started searching everyone in a group for guns because one member of the group was lawfully open carrying a pistol.
This is against the cops searching you without consent. The nig in DC gave consent.

United States v. Ubiles, 224 F.3d 213 (3d Cir. 2000) - A mere allegation that a suspect possesses a firearm... does not justify an officer in stopping a suspect absent reasonable suspicion... For all the officers knew... Ubiles was another celebrant lawfully exercising his right under Virgin Islands law to possess a gun in public... This situation is no different than if the informant had told the police that Ubiles possessed a wallet, a perfectly legal act in the Virgin Islands.
This applies to as (far as the cops can tell) legal gun owners. A tip off that a hoodrat with a criminal record has a gun in his waistband is enough red flags for reasonable suspicion to at least ask a few questions.
 
what the cops did was objectively bullshit.
For citizens you're right. For criminals we just let run around, probably not.
"Suspicion" is such a funny thing isn't it?
A beat cop who knows the territory can be overruled by a judge who never goes to the places of the people whom they judge.
So who is right about suspicion? It's subjective.

Also unfortunately not all people are of the stock that agreed upon the constitution and bill of rights.
Can people who are unable to understand what a right even is or a right from a wrong really be held to the same standard?

If they can then the judge is wrong.
If they can't then they don't deserve the rights.
 
she was a big old fat HAWG of a woman. I think it was just flirting, and a small time frame of weakness of the resident heeb
The resident heeb likes to go hogging???

Maybe he isn't so bad of a lad after all. CTR, you like that back bacon? Them big ol' girls? C'mon now, fess up. We're all friends here. You'll be let off the hook for going after non-kosher ladies.
 
On the Utah primaries, basically went as I expected. Establishment got in, same old shit. Some of my guys won, some got felted. SLC did put in a white guy for the dem candidate though, which was a surprise, I thought they were more pozzed. The funniest reaction though is all the accounts on twitter, seething that their republican candidates didn't get in. It's a weird dynamic here. If you want to run outside SLC, you have to be republican, nobody will vote for you otherwise. This leads to funny results. Overall, the people that are going to get sent to congress this election are solid mid, and I'm sorry they aren't more based.
 
On the Utah primaries, basically went as I expected. Establishment got in, same old shit. Some of my guys won, some got felted. SLC did put in a white guy for the dem candidate though, which was a surprise, I thought they were more pozzed. The funniest reaction though is all the accounts on twitter, seething that their republican candidates didn't get in. It's a weird dynamic here. If you want to run outside SLC, you have to be republican, nobody will vote for you otherwise. This leads to funny results. Overall, the people that are going to get sent to congress this election are solid mid, and I'm sorry they aren't more based.
I mean this with no offense.

But Utah primaries have to be the most boring race in the entire country.
 
"On our word they do not vote.
Liberals don't trust the government for shit, until it's time for them to use something the government is doing to back up their statements, then they love the government. They're so punk rock. :story:

The idea that you can simply make something illegal and then walk away and it will never happen again is just literal fairytale fantasyland bullshit. Even video games don't follow logic that unrealistic.

CTR, you like that back bacon?
Do they make Kosher BBWs?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I mean this with no offense.

But Utah primaries have to be the most boring race in the entire country.
None taken. The most excitement we've had is the new dem district the courts pulled out of their ass. There are some general gripes, mail in voting and shit, but in general, it's going as expected.

What's been interesting to me is observing these retards on twitter fighting over candidates. I suspect some are Dems.
 
This is against the cops searching you without consent. The nig in DC gave consent.
As Mr. Carter raised his shirt, DelBorrell asked, “[h]ey [c]hamp, you not got nothing on you?” Mr. Carterresponded, “no” and lifted his shirt again. Unsatisfied, Officer DelBorrell requested, “[d]o you mind hiking your pants for me real quick?” Mr. Carter complied. “n a single quick motion, [Mr. Carter] hiked his pants [up] by holding them at the waistband with two hands.” He “then lifted his shirt [again] and put it back down.”While this was happening, Officer Guzman had begun to approach Mr. Carterfrom the other group. When he was about six to ten feet away, he noticed a bulge in Mr. Carter’s groin area. Officer Guzman then instructed Mr. Carter to “stand up . . . one more time.” Mr. Carterstood. Guzman then remarked, “[r]ight there, brother, right there,” pointing to Mr. Carter’s right groin area. Mr. Carter replied, “[t]his is my phone,” pulling a phone from his right pocket. Officer Guzman subsequently frisked Mr. Carter and after a brief struggle in which the other officers on the scene joined, the officers recovered a firearm hidden in Mr. Carter’s pants.
So you have a guy, who the police are asking if he has a gun, already told him no, despite having no legal obligation to tell them if he does or not, who already showed his waistband twice despite having no legal obligation to do so, yet the police continued to press him and tell him to do things.

By the way you missed this part.

For its part, the government admits that it lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to seize Mr. Carter when Officer DelBorrell asked him to raise his pants. It also concedes that if it did seize Mr. Carter at that moment, the firearm and statement were products of an unreasonable seizure and should have been suppressed. The government’s sole argument on appeal is that it did not seize Mr. Carter until after Officer DelBorrell’s request that Mr. Carter “hike” his pants up, when it did have reasonable suspicion to seize him. Mr. Carter does not deny that the officers had reasonable suspicion after Officer DelBorrell’s question and simply argues that the seizure began before then
So what was the reasonable basis for the police to continue asking him and giving him 'polite requests' before it became an illegal stop?

The government's postition was there was apparently reasonable suspicion to sieze him after seeing the bulge, my question, which I felt the court should've of asked instead of going on this weird fucking tangent about muh blacks, was on what fucking basis did the suspicion of him having a gun make any difference considering once again, the D.C. law doesn't impose a duty to inform on lawful carriers of firearms until after the police establish reasonable suspicion to stop you?


This applies to as (far as the cops can tell) legal gun owners. A tip off that a hoodrat with a criminal record has a gun in his waistband is enough red flags for reasonable suspicion to at least ask a few questions.
Yet it wasn't in the U.S. Vigin Islands where at the time of that ruling, it was generally impossible for any private citizen to get a carry permit.

Both cases clearly state that the police having knowledge of you being in mere possession of a firearm is never grounds alone for reasonable suspicion of a stop as the police must treat it as lawful until otherwise proven. Mind you in US v. Black involved a group of blacks standing around in a group in the middle of the ghetto like Mr Carter, with one lawfully open carrying a firearm. On that basis the police jumped out and started searching everyone in the group despite absolutely zero evidence anyone else was armed let alone the person open carrying was doing so unlawfully.
 
So you have a guy, who the police are asking if he has a gun, already told him no, despite having no legal obligation to tell them even if he was, already showed his waistband twice despite having no legal obligation to do so, the police continued to press him and tell him to do things.
Tell them to go fuck themselves and if they want to search you, get a warrant.

This is very simple. This is the exact reason why the Judge ruled this way, because she believed niggers in the inner DC city are too stupid to understand you can just tell them to get a warrant and leave the area.

Imagine bootlicking to own da nigs. If the cops are wrong then they are wrong, do not let raycism render you retarded
This is true, but also, Johnny's not wrong. He is a nigger lover, clearly. You can hear the salivating as he types from the text you can read.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole