Starfield - Bethesda's new space IP: will probably be full of fun and easily trackable bugs

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku 2d6
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia

How do you think Starfield will turn out?


  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    1 015
Shouldn't they be extinct if this takes place after Skyrim?
not really no, especially since they count the extremely retarded TESO lore as canon.
other than that it's not out of the realm of possibility of akatosh doing a little trolling and the fat neckbeard they keep at bethesda will go through the same angle in order to explain dragons returning.
Skyrim's MC is literally called "the last dragonborn."
not with mods it ain't.
 
It’s probably not even worth being pirated, much less bought with hard-earned money. You’re a madman.

Go tell your loved ones / caretakers immediately. Do not be alone with your condition. Your life matters. Even if it's black or gay.
1782331752171295.jpg
It was the digital premium edition
 
I pirated this game. Twice. Was it worth it? No, not really but it's more about the principle of the matter. Todd and Micro$lop don't deserve a shiny red cent for this shit! It's not that this game is just mid (which it is) , but it's just irritating to play. I mentioned the hailing mechanic in an earlier post, and maybe this is just a "me" thing, but the map really pisses me off. Playing these games has taught me to use "M" to open the map, then I press "Tab" to close the map, however in this game when you press tab you go from surface map to the system map, then to the star map. So I just end up frantically mashing the tab button to get back to the game. You should only be able to access the system map from your ship, but I'm sure they didn't want the player to have to sit thru a loading screen to fast travel back to their ship, but their way is less immersive, and it creates another problem like I just outlined. Maybe if they had some sort of document that explains design, they might of been able to polish this turd better.

To be fair to Starfield, there isn't anything egregiously stupid like Billy the fridge kid (at least what I saw, which wasn't much), but overall I think this game is stupider than Fallout 4. At least with F4, you could make the cope argument that it's supposed to be a homage to the campy Sci-Fi and creature features of the 50's , but Saarfield was their super serious big brained grounded NASA punk experience. Take Hadrian. She's not a clone because Emil wanted to say something about the ethics of cloning, but because it's supposed to be a sHoCkInG ReValAtIoN. Not to mention all the other clones happened to die conveniently offscreen, plus it would be hard to explain why there's a bunch of people running around that look like a infamous war criminal. And despite Az's famous Fuck your Pronouns meltdown, she's not a tranny. She doesn't refer to herself as trans, and even Space Obama refers to her as her daughter. And despite having the tech to clone people that have been dead for centuries, they couldn't clone any cows and chickens, and instead had to hunt giant armored beak things to near extinction.

Let me put it another way. Think of the thousands of games that have been made in the past three and a half decades. From solo indie dev projects to multi-million dollar AAA releases. Everything from arcade, strategy, platformers, simulations, RPG, FPS, 4X, RTS, etc. Everything from ROMhacks to demakes to remakes. One of those games has to better use of your time than Saarfield. Even if you're a lifelong gamer that has played everything under the sun, I'm sure you could find something!
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The most enjoyable part of Starfield is completely accidental. Since the vast majority of quest-givers and major NPCs are some variety of minority, playing as a straight white dude lets you roleplay as the guy they call in to fix the DEI hires' fuckups.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole