Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General

This is genuinely retarded.

Like I am actually confounded by this. How stupid do you have to be to believe this
When you're to the left of Karl Marx everything to the right of you is fascism. Wikipedia which is mostly center left with some racial and political areas of the site that are laughably fringe left. To the communist this is not fringe enough. It is not enough to simply imply Donald Trump is a Nazi you must outright declare it. Not doing so is helping normalize the fascist enemy. Remember, Reddit is also the same website where people believe the New York times a very, very progressive left website is right-wing because they dared to cover trans stories that were critical of trans ideology. Any deviation from their dogma is tantamount to blasphemy.

TLDR: Wikipedia forces it's politipergs to somewhat hide their views in the articles they write. Redditors take issue with this because they believe they are in a holy war with a genocidal orange dictator and not declaring he is that loud and proud is covering for him.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Redditors take issue with this because they believe they are in a holy war with a genocidal orange dictator and not declaring he is that loud and proud is covering for him.

I think you mean Redditards. Honestly that site is arguably worse than Wikipedia. Wikipedia doesn’t even really try to hide the bias, whereas subs like r/politics masquerade as neutral on their face but are secretly liberal gulags where dissent = ban.
 
This is some Reddit mod level of petty faggotry.

pathetic2.png
 
I think you mean Redditards. Honestly that site is arguably worse than Wikipedia. Wikipedia doesn’t even really try to hide the bias, whereas subs like r/politics masquerade as neutral on their face but are secretly liberal gulags where dissent = ban.
What the FUCK are you talking about? Some of reddit may not have been the cesspool it is now but that was exclusively about 10 years ago at the least, and EVEN THEN r/politics has never been anything other than as-absurdly-tyrant-left-commie-faggot-as-humanly-possible. The fact you posted this shit makes me think you must be very young and haven't been around for very long.
 
Had GPT openly tell me it cant share certain information with me as it doesnt want to endorse "hateful ideologies". It was obviously because their morality or safety team or whatever put in hard guard rails.
In my experience ChatGPT is more willing to talk about right wing beliefs and whatnot in a more neutral tone. I like to test it out whenever a new version or whatever drops just to see if it'll ever really be worth using seriously.
I've also noticed that the quality of ChatGPTs responses changes depending on the device you're on. When I'm on mobile it'll be pretty retarded and overuse emojis whereas on my laptop it's more likely to drop down decently written paragraphs and just in general be more intelligent. This might just be some type of confirmation bias or whatever on my part though.
 
over the years has been slightly critical of Wikipedia due to Wikipedia not being trustworthy and that it's contributors have a left leaning bias in a 2021 interview. He is also a critic of Wikipedia since leaving Wikipedia calling it "broken beyond repair" and that it lacks credibility and accuracy due to left-wing ideological bias.
I guess its akin to feeling of seeing your child troon out and post Trump derange syndrome posts on Bluesky 24/7.
 
I think you're overestimating the impact of wikipedia in this current environment. Information and society right now is so siloed and varied that there isn't really a single arbiter or authority of truth right now(which is a good thing if its these lib fags controlling what's true). The average social media vertical short form video shitpost with even a 100k views probably has more impact than a fagipedia article with a similar amount of views or more a month or so.

And it's not just a single video either, it's dozens and hundreds of videos & posts, which leads to a culture & some form of community which has exponentially more impact than any amount of wiki articles. People don't really scroll on any encyclopedia for 8+ hours a day and find friends there but they do on social media. It might've been different a decade or two ago but I think their monopoly now has lessened.
You say this, but Wikipedia is highly trusted by the devs training ChatGPT et al. The bias in Wikipedia propagates into the LLMs that we are increasingly using in lieu of Google/Wikipedia to find answers. It still has a very real impact on how people see the world.

I've also noticed that the quality of ChatGPTs responses changes depending on the device you're on. When I'm on mobile it'll be pretty retarded and overuse emojis whereas on my laptop it's more likely to drop down decently written paragraphs and just in general be more intelligent. This might just be some type of confirmation bias or whatever on my part though.
I would expect different instructions being injected into ChatGPTs context based on your device info - makes a lot of sense to instruct for conciseness or similar on a mobile device with less screen real-estate to work with. You may be able to control this to some degree if you're signed in, I know Anthropic and Perplexity allow you to set response style preferences on your profile.
 
Thanks for sharing. I'd hate for anyone to miss this:
a.png
I love how retarded these people are. Yeah, just settle for these alternatives you've never heard of if you don't like how biased Wikipedia is.

The bottom commenter fails to see the irony in their own comment. They posted this take on Reddit of all places, one of the most jannied social media platforms around.
 
Regarding 'Cultural Marxism': I think it's fucked for all the reasons everyone in this thread is talking about, but it's also fucked in the opposite way, in that it's named after Marxism and is essentially completely incompatible with Marxism. It's like, Marxism conflicts with 'leftism' too much to even be leftist anymore, but Marxism is obviously far left, so the shitlib trannies infiltrated it and came up with something completely nonsensical the way they always do in order to shoehorn Marxism into something they actually believed in so they could call themselves Marxists, and completely missed the point of Marxism. And it's fucked everything up because most of the 'leftists' are just shitlibs larping as socialists, and "Marxists" are mostly just trannies larping as Marxists.

There is a very simple test: Who is more privileged, a black transwoman or a white man? If you don't answer 'whoever has more income,' you're not Marxist. It is a very hard requirement that you believe in class above all else to be Marxist. I would even go as far as to say that the concept of being transgender existing in anyway beyond mental illness is anti-Marxist: the only Marxist identity is class identity, and trannies chimp out if you don't prioritize their gender identity over all else. Also, all trannies are either: Someone who is rich enough to afford medical treatment out of pocket, and thus evil by Marxist standards, or someone who's using tax payer money for self-sterilization treatment which both wastes the working class's socialism money while also lowering the birthrate of the working class.

And obviously, none of that is acceptable to a 'leftist,' so they had to come up with their own definition of Marxism that means the complete opposite so that they could pretend to be socialist.

So now, identifying with the left is basically impossible, because of how hostile 'leftists' are to leftism. If you're economically left/Marxist, the right hates you because they assume you're a woke retard in addition to disagreeing economically, while also the vast majority of your own party hates you because you're not a woke retard. That's why there's MAGA Communism floating around, it's easier to get conservatives to agree with Marxism than it is to get a 'leftist' to agree with Marxism.
 
Marxism has been intertwined with nigger simping for a very long time. To unlink the two would require the purge of all purges. By that I mean a long program of memento damnatio on some of the most revered Marxist thought leaders of the last century.
Good luck with that. Personally I think you'd have a better time putting on the gas mask mustache and convincing committed racists of the importance of nationalization.

As an example:

I often see it mentioned as one of Stalin's favorite movies but I haven't seen actual sources for this.
Here's one of the co-authors of the script:
1782397858593.png
Isaac Babel (Babel was arrested by the NKVD on 15 May 1939 on fabricated charges of terrorism and espionage, and executed on 27 January 1940.)
lel
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Slippin' Jimmy Wales comments seem like something straight out of 2012 if it weren't for the timestamps. This in particular is so completely disconnected from reality:
1782252478153.png
It has the built in assumption that wikipedia isn't leftist propaganda (lol, lmao) and that there is a dearth of conservatives because of perception when in reality conservatives are actively repressed there AS THE CURRENT INCIDENT SHOWS. These aren't hypothetical problems to look out for bro, it's a history of failures that have already come to pass.
I wonder Conservapedia was compromised and hijacked from the start to completely discredit it.

There is a very simple test: Who is more privileged, a black transwoman or a white man? If you don't answer 'whoever has more income,' you're not Marxist. It is a very hard requirement that you believe in class above all else to be Marxist. I would even go as far as to say that the concept of being transgender existing in anyway beyond mental illness is anti-Marxist: the only Marxist identity is class identity, and trannies chimp out if you don't prioritize their gender identity over all else. Also, all trannies are either: Someone who is rich enough to afford medical treatment out of pocket, and thus evil by Marxist standards, or someone who's using tax payer money for self-sterilization treatment which both wastes the working class's socialism money while also lowering the birthrate of the working class.
Not directly related, but this is what pisses me off when they cry about "punching down". They say I can't make fun of, say, Leslie Jones, because she's a black woman. However, Leslie Jones has far more fame, credentials, and money than perhaps I'll ever have.
 
The article about jerking off to MLP is longer than the one about racism on the internet. What does it take to get a little recognition?
To be honest, the main character of MLP, a literal small horse named Twilight Sparkle has the most porn made of in human history, The achievements of the wankmasters are getting recognized. Sorry, internet racists, you should have dropped more N bombs.
 
Spoiler culture, literally. "If you want to know the ending you have to buy the ticket"

Fuck that. Sometimes I gotta leave early and I want to know how the episode ends. I'm not "Ruining it" for anyone but myself, and fuck those rulemongers.

Did find out Law and Order bitched out on the Luigi episode though (They don't provide the verdict)
There's actually been recent cases where people have used spoiler culture tier reasoning shit to get people into legal trouble in non-american countries. Big one I can think of is that one Japanese guy there was an article repost about in like A&N or somewhere similar a few months back. Like they actually managed get the guy fined for copyright infringement somehow by talking about the plot of the fucking things he was reviewing.

Wyświetl załącznik 9190013

Wyświetl załącznik 9190014
After I found this image, I found out a different screenshot that reveals the person behind this post as a DKF fag
Wyświetl załącznik 9190016
"People die when they are killed" type of shit. Yeah no shit murder's "really frowned upon".
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole