It’s also the only genre that usually has niiice hardcover books. I got a copy of Clockwork Lives and Clockwork Destiny and they are absolutely beautiful books. One day I should read the first book in the trilogy but the cover is embarrassing in comparison with the other two.
Wyświetl załącznik 9180027
Edit: well I went down a rabbit hole and now I'm checking out Mainspring by Jay Lake, where a clockmaker's apprentice was ordered by an archangel to find and rewind the main spring of the earth otherwise all life will cease
I vaguely remember that Jeter and Blaylock were relevant earlyish steampunk writers from the 70s-80s, iirc. After Moorcock started the subgenre with Nomad of the Time Stream.
@Morridowfag
I hope you're wrong. I enjoy LitRPGs as they are a good light read/listen for more tired day and there are some really good writers making those (Dungeon Crawler Carl and The Wandering Inn come to mind), I just can't help but think that this is the same thing that a lot of early 20th century pulp fiction came off back in the day to some people. I ain't saying the whole genre is perfect (with pulp fiction we have a century long filter ensuring the trash remained forgotten while the stars lived on) but it has proven me wrong enough times to make me give it the benefit of a doubt even if I dismiss those more times than I care to count. And that fucking awful romantasy smut trend that BookTok is constantly gooning over sure as hell gives it some points for at least not being more of that fucking shit.
Vidya and tabletop have their influences but ultimately it is used as a mechanical framework to further justify the story and setting, the writing itself tends to take it surprisingly seriously to the point where in some cases I wanna call it anti-millennial writing. Absurd situations but the protagonists take them completely seriously and try to understand the RPG system thrust upon them while doing their best to not die horribly in a new and unfamiliar world. It ain't just brainrot but a fun idea being executed well and being a fresh breath from the sea of middle aged woman's gooning material and politically driven slop at worst, and an actually interesting read at best.
I think the issue with LitRPG is that it doesn't really have the sheer variety that pulps have. Remember, a lot of the major writers that came out of the pulps were on a literary diet of classics. Modern writers? Not so much. I don't really like litrpg stuff and prefer to use my time in reading genre fiction from before 2000 or so.
I will say that, based on what I've read of litrpg and all the asian comics that use litrpg stuff, it's usually pretty straightforwardly simple.
The problem with old pulps is that we've only really started to look at them through a proper critical lens in the past 40 years or so. I'll admit that there were attempts beforehand, but that always got sucked into the high culture/low culture conflict.
The pulps produced Dashiell Hammett, Raymond Chandler, Ray Bradbury, Clark Ashton Smith, H. P. Lovecraft, Robert E. Howard, Philip K. Dick, Kurt Vonnegut, and so many other legitimately notable writers. Even the B-list of pulp writers is pretty respectable once you dive into them. The real issue is that people simply don't read on the scale they used to, as the variety of popular entertainment that's easily accessible outweighs reading. Even with books being easier to access.
I'd say my issue with litrpg is that it's subject to today's "literary inbreeding". Writers, for the most part, aren't as widely read as they were in the pre-internet age.