Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Now that Lidl Drip has left the site, can we remove the option to private one's profile? - It's making me leak.
Because you claim they hate women. Methinks they're like Tantalus who could never grab all the food and water to satiate his hunger and that makes them go insane. Like Audrey Hale cosplaying as the Columbine Shooters - doesn't seem to me she did it because she hated them. Methinks it's because she wanted to fuck them.
As you said, my Glorious Emperor, I am nitpicking. And I think you were wrong in claiming troons troon out because they hate women.
Nope, I was looking for another example of her picking on people out of turn that no one cares about as I mentioned on page 5.
As for you implying I am not lucid or whatever, my intelligence does lean on the emotional side but it is formed over a long period of time, through multiple things I've witnessed. Sharing opinions and having inside jokes is a sign of friendship etc. I don't just jump to conclusions.
I don't interact with users outside of rating their posts and quoting once in awhile and I think that's the best way to go about using the site. Being popular on kf is cringe. Internal drama is cringe.
That’s all I’m saying. The people who are still seething over her and denying that she was ever funny are just telling on themselves for being the silly marks that they are, and still being mad about things she said years after the fact is effete. I don’t appreciate her deliberately twisting the knife when she left just to mindfuck our ooperator, but other than that the only thing she ever did AFAIK was talk shit like anybody else. You don’t have to like your retarded sisters or acknowledge their antics, but it’s insane to actually hate them. My brothers, being this salty is no way to live.
Your proposal is bad and lopsided from a principled perspective, especially mine and my website. The issue has always been that every website is safe for "woman-hate".
>"somebody's gotta do something about this woman-hate problem!!"
>does nothing about said problem
>instead creates a new man-hate problem out of thin air
>is now hated by everybody
>proceeds to cry about being underappreciated or something
The lesson here is a fundamental understanding of how Andrew Tate is a millionaire. Rape white women, enslave white women, beat white women, and reap millions of dollars from white men. Be fair to people and you're a just male feminist everyone despises.
Edit: My anger towards this little gender sperg bullshit is lopsided towards men in part because it disgusts me on a visceral level. I mostly deal with things I don't like by ignoring them. I am very good at icing people out that annoy me. I am very good at not paying attention to things that I don't agree with and see no merit to. When I see hundreds of men who are obviously traumatized, obviously weak and pathetic, building up little sewing circles to fling shit at a thread they don't have to read on a board they never even use, it disgusts me. It builds in me genuine resentment. To see these raped beta men in their faggy little cuck corners crying about how women ruined society. How they're weak and pathetic and can't do anything under the mighty Gynocracy. I never knew they existed until I saw them on my site causing problems for me that I can't just ignore. They're weak. They're beneath me. I should not have to deal with them. They can't even look away from something that upsets them, and then they force me to pay attention to their crying. Grown men crying to me about how unfair it is the girls are saying mean things. Men in their 40s and 50s, crying, about a forum thread they deliberately force themselves to read. Just drop dead. Sincerely, splatter the mud with your brains.
Diabolical disorientation has been around long before fat autistic women figured out they could be collectively obnoxious enough to make fat autistic men go crazy. If it played any role in the contemporary iteration of trannyism, it was only needed for a pretext.
Diabolical disorientation has been around long before fat autistic women figured out they could be collectively obnoxious enough to make fat autistic men go crazy. If it played any role in the contemporary iteration of trannyism, it was only needed for a pretext.
Sure, maybe it wasn't there at the very beginning, but the ideology is what led to the proliferation of it that.
Feminists were first saying roles between men and women were "social constructs"
The logical conclusion to this is that gender itself is a social construct, or else how else would gender roles themselves be "social constructs.?" it's simply the logical conclusion to this.
This really proliferated the whole "Men can become women because gender is a social construct"
I read 15 pages of this thread because it was featured on the front page rotating banner and I've been exposed to facets of this forum I didn't even know existed. I use this site because it's got the best archives, documents, and discussion threads for various types of weirdos on the internet. It's like a gayer, internet gossip version of Wikipedia to me. I know plenty of other people who also use it exclusively for that purpose. I think it's a vocal minority of faggots who actually care about the misandry vs misogyny bullshit. Most lolcow threads have an established culture and if you try to shit up those threads with man or woman hate either way you catch a temp ban.
That said, private profiles are fat and I would not have sex with them. Don't be a sperg if you don't want spergs sperging on your profile page. People use profile wall comments to inform other users if someone is a pedo or Indian and that's a valuable service to me.
I read 15 pages of this thread because it was featured on the front page rotating banner and I've been exposed to facets of this forum I didn't even know existed. I use this site because it's got the best archives, documents, and discussion threads for various types of weirdos on the internet. It's like a gayer, internet gossip version of Wikipedia to me. I know plenty of other people who also use it exclusively for that purpose. I think it's a vocal minority of faggots who actually care about the misandry vs misogyny bullshit. Most lolcow threads have an established culture and if you try to shit up those threads with man or woman hate either way you catch a temp ban.
That said, private profiles are fat and I would not have sex with them. Don't be a sperg if you don't want spergs sperging on your profile page. People use profile wall comments to inform other users if someone is a pedo or Indian and that's a valuable service to me.
Aside from the misogyny vs misandry shit (Which I agree is completely overplayed and I'm honestly kinda tired of it all).
There's no other place I can think of as good as archiving, and numerous discussion threads about specific people on the internet than Kiwifarms.
The strength of Kiwifarms is that fact that it is a webforum, which you don't see a lot of nowadays.
And because it's a webforum, you have specific threads on specific people.
It breeds a sort of "community within communities" where you have people on a specific thread making a collective effort to document one specific person and have it all archived down.
On a platform on Twitter, you don't really have that. Since it's not a web forum and just a free for all social media page, there really isn't much of a structure to it like in here.
Sure, there are communities there, but there is a sort of "looseness" to Twitter that isn't on here.
The thing I hate about Twitter is if you want to find info on a specific person, you have to search for a widespan of different Twitter accounts and their different posts and you can't be sure if the info is correct.
On this website, all you have to do is go to the first page of the thread, and you have all your info of a Lolcow there.
I don't feel Twitter really has this.
Sure, maybe it wasn't there at the very beginning, but the ideology is what led to the proliferation of it that.
Feminists were first saying roles between men and women were "social constructs"
The logical conclusion to this is that gender itself is a social construct, or else how else would gender roles themselves be "social constructs.?" it's simply the logical conclusion to this.
This really proliferated the whole "Men can become women because gender is a social construct"
I can’t work up any particular anger about ugly midwit lesbians decades ago getting used by Marxist jews to popularize Talmudic word sorcery to ultimately lay some of the groundwork for the rollout of golem 3.0. If it wasn’t them, it would have been somebody else. Just because some women are stupid enough to play the “let’s you and him fight” game doesn’t mean the rest of us have to be.
