Rupert Lowe, Restore Britain, The Rape Gang Enquiry - 'Then millions must go'. 'I don't care'.

Hanging rapists should not be a controversial position but something happened in the 1960s where the death penalty was being withdrawn in many parts of the West.
That would be right before Marxism and Socialism/Communism was permanently discredited by Solzhenitsyn, so it was part of a global subversion campaign to make sure the West kept as many millstones around their neck as they could.

Remember we've known the life hack for dealing with Sikhs and Niggers and other violent subhumans for longer than recorded history. The gallows calls, Mr. Digwa.

I just hope Restore Britain, if the stars align and the Fabians are unable to steal power, is able to put Digwa and his family to death for what they did.
 
Repealing the Equality Act and the Race Relations Act. Enoch Powell was right etc.
RR.png

Article: Can Reform see off the threat from Restore? Spectator (amazing kino cover art below)
digital-cover-06062026-f1.webp

On the BBC excluding Rebecca Shepherd from the Question Time Makerfield episode, the BBC clarified that this was an intentional decision ''based - as is always the case - on their past and current electoral support'' (Express). Lowe/Restore responses are typically pithy - "When Restore Britain wins, you will be defunded on day one and left to survive on your own commercial worth".
BBC 1.png BBC 2.png

Agree completely with posters that said this is the best of both scenario for Restore.
how good at media is Cllr Kenyon?
He's terrible. His first interview after arseholegate was with a pretty gentle reporter and he still fumbled it badly. In particular he didn't know what a flagship Reform policy was and couldn't improvise anything. In the second video he does a bit better but sounds obviously coached.


Ben Habib is now mothballing Advance UK entirely to clear a path for Restore.
A lot of supporters concerned about Habib getting a position in Restore, though I don't really get that from Lowe's response. Meme related.
RL BH.png
 
BBC Question Time tomorrow is a Makerfield special, and features all candidates apart from Restore Britain's Rebecca Shepherd, who was not invited. Restore are considering legal action (Mail) and planning an action day in Makerfield. Shepherd is polling in third place (of six candidates).
Question Time typically has no more than five guests on so they might try to argue that. However, they did have six for the the Senedd and the Scottish election specials and eight panellists for an election special earlier last month.

The HIGNFY clip is irritating. Planned and logically flawed. I haven't watched it in years. And I haven't liked Paul Merton since he went all in on making it impossible for Angus Deayton (who was a great presenter) to continue. I still remember the gleeful spite Paul had every time he stuck the knife in, determined to make sure Deayton couldn't keep his job. I asked some older people if they still watched it and was told "No, it went a bit off".
 
(to be clear, I'm also American (hope we get a Rupert for jeets))
You will, it just might take more time for that particular pot to boil.
Repealing the Equality Act and the Race Relations Act. Enoch Powell was right etc.
This was the poison pill willfully swallowed by the Tories in 2010 that pretty stymied any and all attempts to fix shit with regard to immigration.
If you can't discriminate based on nationality, you can't implement policy to restrict certain kinds of immigrant from coming in.
Equality Act + Human Rights Act + Leaving the ECHR = return of total control of our borders and the ability to control immigration without simply making the process more tedious and difficult, which is all the Conservatives could do as a result of the Equality Act (one they chose not to repeal)
 
The Advance fold-in is not without friction. New members are loudly punching right already, Restore members are worried about subversion, and particularly Advance member Tommy Robinson joining up.

Ben Habib says Lowe invited him to campaign in Makerfield and think Steve Laws should be removed from the party. The Yookay aesthetics alone are terrible.
BH2.png

Laurence Fox reposts Owen Jones to countersignal the nationalists in Restore.
LF 1.png LF 2.png
 
The Advance fold-in is not without friction. New members are loudly punching right already, Restore members are worried about subversion, and particularly Advance member Tommy Robinson joining up.

Ben Habib says Lowe invited him to campaign in Makerfield and think Steve Laws should be removed from the party. The Yookay aesthetics alone are terrible.
Is it over?
 
I must admit I have never felt such hatred before after hearing Lowe read out aloud what the victims went through. And the absolute gall of many MP's to either fiddle with their watches or look at their phone. Even parts of the Nazi leadership at Nuremburg had the decency to show some form of horror after being shown what happened in the concentration camps. This is not "Millions must go" this is "Millions must be executed"
 
I asked some older people if they still watched it and was told "No, it went a bit off".
Bad as HIGNFY is depressingly these days Private Eye can be worse. They do periodic online videos and the overwhelming majority on there essentially are them parroting the Guardian or Independent take on everything. I watched one of the mid-wits repeat every single BlueSky post from people who deserve a thread here on multiple subjects while Ian clapped along like a trained seal.

I feel some genuine pity for Ian since when he passes his introduction to the afterlife will be Peter Cook popping him in the eye and calling him a sellout.
 
Not yet, but a lot of people are watching and waiting to see what happens next. I give Lowe credit for how strategically he handled Habib last time and without being a 'trust the plan' retard, think it's too early to doom. Here's a post that put it better than I could:
Hector.png

To add to what I said earlier about forrins trying to jump on and ruin any British movements; either its willful sabotage, or they are trying to be 'one of the good ones'.
1780856951729.png
Third possible option: they think they've won and are doing victory laps/territorial pissing, that Baraka Boriswaver is the embodiment of African braggadocio. In case it's not clear this picture is an edit, the original is in this post by Orm, who claims Baraka is not allowed to attend the campaign with Habib (and offers his own opinion on their provocative approach to Restore).
ORM.png

Better edit:
BH.jpeg

There's some weird stuff going on with Advance shutting down, I don't care enough to dig in properly but recording for posterity that even the last few remaining Advance loyalists aren't comfy with Habib's integrity right now.
ADV 0.png Adv 1.png Adv 2.png Adv 3.png Adv 4.png Adv 5.png

The Restore Britain account made the most of the Question Time snub.
RS 2.png


Andy Burnham in Makerfield got pressed over the rape gang inquiry -


Loweposts ahead of protests in Southampton tonight -
RL 1.png RL 2.png

Dominic Cummings appears to fancy Restore somewhat which doesn't seem too surprising, IMO he's the Westminster insider most likely to have an account here, considering his twitter bio includes the words 'weaponising autism'.
DC.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
And I haven't liked Paul Merton since he went all in on making it impossible for Angus Deayton (who was a great presenter) to continue. I still remember the gleeful spite Paul had every time he stuck the knife in, determined to make sure Deayton couldn't keep his job. I asked some older people if they still watched it and was told "No, it went a bit off".
Merton was fucking insufferable in that ep. Deayton was absolutely perfect for the show, who cared if he did a bit of coke with prozzies? He knew how to live. Merton wishes he was half as funny.

Loweposting about Restore's child and family policies; child benefits for British working families, two-child cap reinstated, make childcare and more child-related items tax deductible, abolishing stamp duty for British families (one or both parents, full policy 'coming soon'), and allowing more rounds of IVF on the NHS (X)
I have been married for 40 years now - four children, two grandchildren. The best decision was ever made was building our family. It is an appalling shame that so many British men and women feel unable to do the same for reasons outside of their control. My generation has spectacularly failed them all. We need to own up to that, and we need to fix it.

There is finally a pro-family political party that will reverse so much of the damage done - Restore Britain.

How?

Tax breaks for parents. Let working men and women keep more of what they earn to spend how they choose. This is THE most important policy above all else. Merge tax allowances for married couples. Trust families to spend their money, not the Government.

A Restore Britain Government will front-load child benefit. Pay more in the earlier years when the help is needed. Wouldn’t cost a penny, but would mean that parents get help when they really need it buying prams, cots, nappies etc.

This would be exclusively for British children with one or two British parents.

Widen VAT exemptions for child-related items, and expand tax-deductible childcare costs.

Reducing tax obviously helps, but we need more - Restore Britain would make childcare fully tax deductible. All hours.

Regulation should be eased so that ratios aren’t so strict, with more children per adult allowed. Encourage youngsters into childcare with proper bursaries, apprenticeships and so on. Tax incentives for more nurseries/pre-schools.

Foreign children with foreign parents would not be eligible for free childcare paid for by the taxpayer.

If a healthy Brit is on benefits and refuses to work? They will not receive free childcare. You’ve got the time, look after your child. Working parents should be given the help. Not the healthy indolent.

The two-child cap would be reinstated.

If you want more children but can’t be bothered to work? That’s your problem, not the taxpayer.

Restore Britain will abolish stamp duty for British families (full policy coming soon). Priority on social housing lists. No foreign national families in social housing would free up an enormous amount of space for British men and women to build their family.

Restore Britain would overhaul spousal visas - British citizens should be able to raise their families in Britain with a foreign spouse, without being treated like criminals by the Home Office. This would be alongside the ‘red list’ to crush fraud. That is positive immigration, and should be welcomed. Restore Britain will welcome it.

IVF and fertility treatment. There should be proper investment in helping those who struggle to have children naturally. Not brutally rationed as it currently is. More rounds, more chances. This would not be offered to the entire third world as it is now - it would all be funded by simply not doing that.

A Restore Britain Government would allow parents to take their children out of school for a limited number of term-time days per year, as the parents see fit. If the child is developing well, that is a decision for the parents. A small change that will save families thousands...

Restore Britain stands with the young British men and women who want to build a family.

Most importantly, our wider plan of restoration will give them the confidence they need to have children, to bring them into the world. On tax, deportations, crime. Everything. It all needs to change to restore belief. That is our objective.

Our plan will make a family possible for millions more British men and women - this is how we Restore Britain.
 
As we're getting close to the by-election, do you believe it was a good idea for Restore to stand? On one hand, it's brought a lot of public attention to them, on the other, it's given Andy Burnham a good chance of winning and becoming PM (assuming all the Restore voters would have otherwise voted for Reform).
 
As we're getting close to the by-election, do you believe it was a good idea for Restore to stand? On one hand, it's brought a lot of public attention to them, on the other, it's given Andy Burnham a good chance of winning and becoming PM (assuming all the Restore voters would have otherwise voted for Reform).
Absolutely. It's a labour stronghold, with the latest figures I've seen giving them more votes than Restore and Reform combined: The chances of winning were always vanishingly small, but the real-world experience will be priceless.
Talk of "splitting the vote" is kind of pointless - it implies Reform are actually capable of delivering change, but expecting the people who got us into this mess to now get us out of it because they're wearing a different tie is retarded.
To extent that it is true, I'd say the "more of the same" vote is split between Labour and Reform.

Don't just vote for a lizard in case the wrong lizard gets in. Vote for a non-lizard.
 
As we're getting close to the by-election, do you believe it was a good idea for Restore to stand? On one hand, it's brought a lot of public attention to them, on the other, it's given Andy Burnham a good chance of winning and becoming PM (assuming all the Restore voters would have otherwise voted for Reform).
Assuming all the restore voters would have voted Reform is a bit of a reach. Reform have no entitlement to anyone's vote.

Anyone who's ever voted has been told that they can't vote for a party they actually want, they have to vote for ESTABLISHMENT PARTY A/B as a compromise (tick where appropriate). Reform is basically just ESTABLISHMENT PARTY C but with Nige's face on it. Although the average man on the street is probably less keyed in than online autists such as ourselves, plenty are aware of what Nigel is and what the people he's surrounded himself did whilst in government.

Restore is something else maybe, no harm in seeing how it goes.

At the end of the day, even if Burnham wins because of Restore's magical vote vampirism...he's Burnham. He's not some Bismarckian political titan set to put Labour on a path to victory for 20 years, he's just a slightly gayer Starmer who's only managed not to have a negative reputation with the wider public because he's not been near the 'fuck up country' buttons since Brown was relevant.

As much as Blair wanted to make UK politics like US politics where BIG MAN EVERYTHING VOTE FOR BIG MAN is the only thing, he didn't completely succeed (though that skinwalker certainly gave it a good go), Whether Burnham wins (and then manages to oust Starmer) or if Kenyon wins, Labour's image has still been greatly damaged for the foreseeable future, and their choice of PM won't save them.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole