💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
You can't restrain me from talking about AARON because I was never strained so how can I be restrained? That's like saying Stephen Hawkings can walk. Because he can't.

:really:
 
Nigga drive there and get it directly from a farm lol. Why settle for supermarket untraceable crap when you can pluck a wheel directly from some Joe?

There are two specialist cheese supplies within walking distance from my house. The nearest, The Cheese Wheel, doesn't have a website.

Here's the website of the next closest. Locally sourced, they claim. Supporting local farmers, they insist. Yet I can't see any Cheshire on there at all.

My guess is that tastes have changed and there just isn't the demand for Cheshire that there used to be. If people were asking for it, I bet they'd sell it. Our local Waitrose (a ten mile drive, but I'm used to walking to the supermarket, not driving) actually does sell great, artisan crafted Cheshire. And I do drive out there once a week for all the great stuff I can't buy in our local supermarkets -- the dry aged beef is hellishly expensive, twice the price of supermarket beef -- but it's so damn good.

He got pretty much the maximum that anyone would get for a first time drug offense.

He got what you'd expect if it was a first time 'posssession for personal use' charge. Rekieta should have been charged with supplying. He was buying by the ounce and supplying Kayla and April. They had Aaron's testimony that he'd also supplied him, so a supply conviction should have been a shoo-in.
 
It will be. The judge is a person. The judge isn't a computer that ignores everything human and just rules on logical inputs. It will be written like it was just law and facts but in the end, the judge will craft a decision that punishes the dickhead for being a dickhead. This isn't a 1st amendment case, it's a lovers quarrel more akin to family court. Nick doesn't get that the decision will be about equity more than about rights. He's also going to get stuck paying Aaron's legal bill. his admission that he abused the process will be a part of that.

Judge: "You're a dickhead. Here's your dickhead conditions. Failure to abide is contempt. No bail arrest warrants will be issued until you appear in this court to explain the violation."

Then they just sit in jail until they can appear for contempt. Judge can let him go after jail and accept his 1st amdt argument that it wasn't contempt. The process becomes the punishment. And Rekieta is such a dick that his appeals will be denied just like his Frank's motions. He'll sperge out about it, too. He cannot read social cues. He's due for a reckoning.

Nick thinks people and systems should treat him like autistic machines. 'Yes, I pitched and whinged and maybe called you nasty names, but now that is all done, you HAVE to give me a slap on the rist because of MY CONSTITOOSHUN and MAGIC WORDS!'

This is the petulant behaviour of a child who refuses to do their chores all day, then melts down when they are punished and cries, 'I'LL DO IT NOW! PLEASE DON'T PUNISH MEEEEE!' The whole point of punushment is that your were being a recalcitrant shitstain and this is to teach you to do as you are told when you are told--it is not just about the task itself.

Didn't skelly and whore run some kind of daycare?
We know they scammed PPP loans from the government already. Who wants to bet they dabbled in some ethnic bookkeeping too?

Not that we know--unless someone finds somehting about an LLC he used to 'pay' the nanny.



Meanwhile Nick is gathering 'member berries:

1000008624.jpg
 
He got what you'd expect if it was a first time 'posssession for personal use' charge. Rekieta should have been charged with supplying. He was buying by the ounce and supplying Kayla and April. They had Aaron's testimony that he'd also supplied him, so a supply conviction should have been a shoo-in.
Not to mention the scale, empty baggies, and pill press they found in his home. I knew a guy who got arrested for marijuana possession back in the day, and they tacked on intent to distribute just because he also had a scale in his car when they arrested him.
 
He got what you'd expect if it was a first time 'posssession for personal use' charge. Rekieta should have been charged with supplying. He was buying by the ounce and supplying Kayla and April. They had Aaron's testimony that he'd also supplied him, so a supply conviction should have been a shoo-in.
Did he sell it or just share what he had? The statute calls it "sale crimes" vs "possession crimes." "Possession crimes" are also subdivided by weight so he was charged appropriately for what was found. The amount he bought or possessed doesn't alter "sale" vs "possession" but possessing larger quantities is a more serious possession crime.
 
Rekieta should have been charged with supplying. He was buying by the ounce and supplying Kayla and April. They had Aaron's testimony that he'd also supplied him, so a supply conviction should have been a shoo-in.
That would be a chickenshit use of the trafficking and distribution laws. Granted, I know the laws in many states count: gifting, trading, exchanging, etc. as forms of sale this, but this is clearly not what the trafficking laws are meant for.
 
That would be a chickenshit use of the trafficking and distribution laws. Granted, I know the laws in many states count: gifting, trading, exchanging, etc. as forms of sale this, but this is clearly not what the trafficking laws are meant for.
This is why when Rekieta is being a smug insufferable lying faggot it becomes difficult for people to keep a sense of proportion. Wanting him to have the most horrific outcome merited by his constant faggotry still requires at least a smidge of realism about likely results. But then Minnesota goes out of its way to enable him and won't even stick to its own rules and laws so it becomes a fighting against the tide proposition.
tl;dr he has lolcow plot armor and real life is frequently unfair anyway.
 
That would be a chickenshit use of the trafficking and distribution laws. Granted, I know the laws in many states count: gifting, trading, exchanging, etc. as forms of sale this, but this is clearly not what the trafficking laws are meant for.
And what happened to Aaron was a chickenshit use of the revenge pornography laws. The state pursues bullshit charges and laws regularly, it's just especially noticable that they didn't even try with Nick. If a normal person had gotten caught with that much coke, with all that paraphernalia, they would have tried to charge them with intent to distribute. Let alone if they had testimony that the drugs were being bought wholesale and divided up for later consumption with multiple other people.
 
That would be a chickenshit use of the trafficking and distribution laws. Granted, I know the laws in many states count: gifting, trading, exchanging, etc. as forms of sale this, but this is clearly not what the trafficking laws are meant for.
In a state that doesn't suffer from the myopia of being minnesota I would think that the pill press would be a critical factor to consider in combination with the quantity if you wanted to charge him with distribution instead of possession. A real state might see how he has enriched organized crime to the tune of a house and a half and enough money to put his children through college and think he's a general piece of shit, say fuck it, and tip the scale against him for it. And if the general public complains just put out a press release that is pictures of the banged up balldomobile with the LAWPOPE plates and simply say "coked up eight year olds, dude."
 
He got what you'd expect if it was a first time 'posssession for personal use' charge. Rekieta should have been charged with supplying. He was buying by the ounce and supplying Kayla and April. They had Aaron's testimony that he'd also supplied him, so a supply conviction should have been a shoo-in.
I'm still convinced that the reason we never got the bodycam was that Nick not only had enough drugs to qualify for an intent to distribute charge, but likely had enough to require a mandatory report to the DEA, that the local sheriff's office destroyed a good deal of the drugs to keep everything local, and that the footage would have shown enough cocaine and ketamine present that, if a DEA agent ever saw it, would get them a very uncomfortable visit. This is also why I thought it was a mistake for Hardin to go through the Minnesota court system instead of the Federal courts, since the state judges might intuit what the local authorities were trying to do and cover for them.
 
This is why when Rekieta is being a smug insufferable lying faggot it becomes difficult for people to keep a sense of proportion. Wanting him to have the most horrific outcome merited by his constant faggotry still requires at least a smidge of realism about likely results. But then Minnesota goes out of its way to enable him and won't even stick to its own rules and laws so it becomes a fighting against the tide proposition.
tl;dr he has lolcow plot armor and real life is frequently unfair anyway.
A realistic hope would be to see him crash straight into a learing center at 300mph, turning the car and and the entire building into debris and twisted metal, and killing exactly one person because the building is empty.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole