Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
📚 MegathreadTrannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet
He’s a rapist and a just society would see him killed. Stole a huge portion of her life, time no one gets back, and his only thoughts the entire time were about himself.
Act like you've mistaken a liberal biological woman for a tranny and see how much they take it as a compliment. Ask when she started her transition and tell her she passes so well (this will translate to "I think you're ugly and look like a man in a wig" to any woman, even if they're pro-trans). Troons thinking bio women are jealous of them is pure delusion. Real women would be offended if you mistook them for a tranny.
Just like how most men who simp for troons would never date one. Proof they don't actually believe troons are women. The ones who would are chasers and total closet homos.
He’s a rapist and a just society would see him killed. Stole a huge portion of her life, time no one gets back, and his only thoughts the entire time were about himself.
And other Reddit manchildren celebrate him for it. Somehow, leaving behind your wife and kids, to make skirt go spinny for other Peter Pan Syndrome retards online is "brave".
Just like how most men who simp for troons would never date one. Proof they don't actually believe troons are women. The ones who would are chasers and total closet homos.
Without a giant PL I can’t explain too much about this but it is completely wrong (easy to look up though). It is a very frequently repeated myth that is so pervasive people just cite it endlessly without thinking.
The effect is closer to confidence and competitiveness, and the idea that it makes people (or just men) angry or aggressive in the way it is typically formulated as “roid rage” is false.
For many reasons - tranny related and otherwise for example sports doping - there’s not terribly much research out there on this, but what is out there does not support the assertion. For example when studying the effects of exogenous test on hierarchies where cooperation and sharing were rewarded, participants did not become more aggressive, instead they became more altruistic. It gives you more of what you need to win and the drive to apply it.
Obviously you can change the conditions to one where aggression and violence are rewarded/how one gains standing and then you’re going to see more of those things, but that’s the situation driving that outcome not something intrinsic in testosterone itself.
Anyway thanks for coming to endocrinology 101 with Dr Andy, I’m not trying to be a smartass here but I think if we’re going to bully trannys (and we should) then we should do it from a position of integrity. We’re not the ones making bathtub T and chopping off our cocks, and the best way to refute all their imaginary retardation is to be precise and accurate in our rebuke.
I dunno. I know a guy who had testicular cancer and got his balls removed, and then he had to go on TRT. Without fail, every time he would get the TRT shots (or whatever form they took) he got angry and aggressive, to an actually comical degree.
One of my former classmates whose transition so far has consisted of: using exclusively they/them, finding the idea of going by a nickname in public empowering, wearing flannel, getting a buzzcut, and taking up smoking (jk, she's using a fake cigarette to look cool).
It's just embarrassing at this point. Especially at the age she is. There are some people patting her on the head on social media and telling her how proud they are of her for "finding" herself, but not to the extent that others I knew that pooned out got even a couple years ago. Probably would've had better luck trying to make Steampunk cool again.
Act like you've mistaken a liberal biological woman for a tranny and see how much they take it as a compliment. Ask when she started her transition and tell her she passes so well (this will translate to "I think you're ugly and look like a man in a wig" to any woman, even if they're pro-trans). Troons thinking bio women are jealous of them is pure delusion. Real women would be offended if you mistook them for a tranny.
This would also be a good way to expose the trans propaganda that normal people need to affirm gender because as soon as the woman who was subjected to this insult told anyone friendly to her about it there is a 1% chance that person would just listen in sympathetic silence because the woman is in fact so astoundingly ugly there is no way to even try to deny it, a 99% chance that person tells the woman not to pay attention to the insult and she is beautiful just like she is and 0% chance she will be told hints about makeup or surgery to try the thwart future confusion about if she is really a man.
I know a BPD head case that at first was a lesbian, admitted she was bisexual and got with a man, had a child with him, now she’s full pooner and on T complete with a new name of some demon.
I worry for her even though she hates me now lol, she was born with severe scoliosis and has had many many back surgeries and I think 3 fusions now.
What effect is T going to have on her bones?
Bitch you’re mainly titanium scaffolding at this point!
Mostly I worry for her daughter- there’s no way she’s going to come out well adjusted.
In fact I’m betting that her daughter will poon out too eventually.
Obviously the fact that he is a man sexually harassing a woman is one thing. The tranny is probably too autistic to know his environment. I call my coworkers aids infested niggers and they call me a faggot back. Such is blue collar work in the country. I would never say that in an office or even just a city.
Even woman to woman, that 'joke' isn't appropriate. I'd be skeeved out if another woman, let alone a troon, said that to me. That was a very thinly veiled attempt to get some.
There are numerous times that people with PhDs are laughably wrong about easily observable facts. For example, trannies. Most PhD holders in the world would probably parrot "trans women are women" these days. Let us also not forget that the entire scientific field is in the midst of a replication crisis where many if not most published scientific studies cannot be replicated.
If we were just to take credentials at face value over the evidence our own senses and experience give us, we would all have to shut up and drink the tranny koolaid.
Sure, it was an anecdote. But I'm sure you've also seen many cases of red-faced FtM troonrage, too.
Late, but something unique to troon hair is also pivotal to why pooner beards tend to be patchy and pube-like, yet upsettingly long. Long hair, especially if it's thick, curly etc, needs cutting if you want it to stay looking good. A split end will travel up the hair and make you look ratty and frizzy if left untouched.
However, lazier troons don't usually care about hair quality, just length. They'll grow it out agonisingly slowly over years with zero haircuts, traditional lazy autist male haircare, elastic bands instead of hair ties, cheap bleach and box dye. Hence their frazzled and thin hair even before MPB kicks in.
Pooner beards often go the same way. The first downy hairs that you get at puberty and usually are shaved and grow back better each time are never shaved as they're a mark of pride, so never get to develop into a thicker stubble or beard. Instead, fluffy weak strands are maintained until they have those greasy, wispy puffs under their chins.
ETA a lulsy post I found while googling for examples.
I wish I could use two stickers on one reply. For that lovely descriptor alone, I wanted to use the Horrifying rating, but I relented. Thank you for that, username Femboy Glowie, it will haunt me for a while to come.
They probably would. We’re entitled to our own political positions just like anyone else. But: that’s not the same as saying a biochemist is wrong about a biochemical process with extraordinarily consistent findings over many years in many countries. And that’s actually the discussion at hand.
This is actually incorrect, but I can see why people outside academia might think this.
Critical theory-based programs have infested our faculties (think gender studies, women’s studies, all the “grievance studies” really) and these are producing an extraordinary amount of absolute diarrhea that no one reads, no one cites, and it’s all Marxist word salad that has no scientific method behind it and no data - it’s almost all just made up nonsense.
This is what cannot be replicated. The hard sciences are as robust and falsifiable as they have ever been, we’re just drowning under an avalanche of horseshit from made-up faculties that pursue agenda not truth.
I say this not to bully strangers on the internet, but you need to correct your fire on this. You very much should hate this postmodern political faggotry wearing scientific clothing, but if you end up having a low opinion of all the branches of science as a result then you have been fooled by the faggotry (and one could argue that’s at least partially their goal) and you’re robbing yourself of your single most powerful tool to refute their nonsense. Baby/bathwater situation really.
If we were just to take credentials at face value over the evidence our own senses and experience give us, we would all have to shut up and drink the tranny koolaid.
Good for you. Don’t take my word for it. In fact all the best people I’ve ever worked with have insisted no one should take their word for anything- especially just because of a few letters after their name - but I did share the outline of a study and suggest people go looking for more. You should do that, it will give you a much more nuanced understanding than just this one guy you know.
I’m going to pay you the courtesy of assuming you know the difference between small sample size anecdotal evidence and statistically significant controlled studies. Most people appreciate that at a surface level at least, but here’s what people tend to forget about anecdotal evidence: what exactly is it evidence of?
Let’s take your guy who lost his testicles to cancer (by the way, very sorry to hear about this, assuming it was a friend to some extent). He will not be happy about that. I am sure most people can imagine the feelings of loss, the frustration and anger at the situation, and maybe every time he has to take TRT shots it’s a stark reminder that he’s now less of a man, a core part of what made him who he is is missing. In this situation is it the testosterone making him angry?
Then there’s ethnographical information I don’t have. Perhaps this guy lives/works in an environment where aggression is rewarded and a core part of the social hierarchy. Is it the testosterone now?
If he’s a cancer survivor he is likely also on a lot of other medications. A lot of strong medications have mood effects - especially when a lot of these things don’t have a lot of long term drug interaction results to look for when you’re on a bit of a remission cocktail. Is it the testosterone now?
To really answer this you’d need to compare many other men who also lost their testicles in similar ways, live similar lifestyles, and have a similar overall treatment plan.
There’s nothing invalid about making anecdotal observations, you just have to be aware of how limited and contextual they are and what you’re actually observing before you use it as a counterpoint to decades of large scale clinical and longitudinal data.
BTW you might decide I am some asshole who likes arguing with strangers on the internet - and fair enough if you do - but I genuinely hope there’s something here you hadn’t fully considered and I really hope you take a more granular view of “science” as it is your single most powerful thinking tool you will ever acquire. Don’t let commie faggots ruin it for you. Please.
