- Dołączono
- 12 Kwi 2021
Example from CityNerd:NYC has a lot of elevated highways and rail lines that have had zero maintenance and could collapse at any moment. Urbanists are actually hoping for Brooklyn-Queens Expressway to collapse so they can get rid of it like San Francisco did with the Embarcadero Freeway after an earthquake (which resulted in the Golden Gate Bridge being disconnected from the highway system). This is despite the fact that it's a vital freight link for all of Long Island including Brooklyn and Queens.
23:04
He argues that the highway doesn't move freight:
These are the people who think themselves to be expert city designers.The other argument that tends to be persuasive with politicians on any kind of freeway project is that freight movement is critical to the city's economy, and this is a freight corridor. I am a little sympathetic to that. Freight movement is important, but I'm just skeptical how useful a facility like this is for freight movement when the vast majority of vehicles clogging it up don't appear to be moving any cargo other than the drivers themselves. There was a time when a lot more heavy industry existed along this corridor, and the argument made more sense. But it's 2026. There's been a lot of residential conversion. Freight movement is still important, but the nature of it and the technology behind it have evolved enormously since the BQE was built. So, the BQE is an artifact of a certain era in the city's history. But the question New Yorkers really need to ask is, what kind of city do we want?
Also, every other argument in the video applies to NYC's elevated subway lines (most of which are about aesthetics and noise), but you'll never see him bring that up. NYC's subways are insanely loud, far louder than any highway I've ever heard.
