Karmelo Anthony indicted in Frisco track meet stabbing death of Austin Metcalf, officials say - How long before Austins father calls for his sons murderer to be pardoned?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Karmelo Anthony indicted in Frisco track meet stabbing death of Austin Metcalf, officials say​


Karmelo Anthony, the Frisco teen charged with murder for an April track meet stabbing, was indicted on a murder charge.

b8ca9c5e-a052-4fb2-8b9c-297f2cdc6d1f_16x9.jpg
b8ca9c5e-a052-4fb2-8b9c-297f2cdc6d1f_750x422.jpg


Credit: WFAA

Austin Metcalf (left) was fatally stabbed at a Frisco track meet, and Karmelo Anthony (right) was charged with murder in connection with the case.

Author: Rachel Behrndt

Published: 1:59 PM CDT June 24, 2025

Updated: 2:47 PM CDT June 24, 2025

Facebook

FRISCO, Texas — Karmelo Anthony, the teen accused of fatally stabbing another teen, Austin Metcalf, at a Frisco track meet, has been indicted on a murder charge, officials said.

A grand jury indicted Anthony on Tuesday, according to the Collin County District Attorney's Office. A murder charge is punishable by 5-99 years or life in prison.



Anthony, a 17-year-old former student of Frisco Centennial High School, was arrested and charged with murder in the fatal stabbing of Frisco Memorial High School student athlete Austin Metcalf in April at a track meet in Frisco ISD's Kuykendall Stadium. He was released from jail later that month after his bond was reduced from $1 million to $250,000.

Anthony has claimed self defense in the case, which garnered national attention, heightening racial tensions and raising security concerns among everyone connected to the case, including both families and Judge Angela Tucker, who is presiding over the case.

"We know this case has struck a deep nerve — here in Collin County and beyond," Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis said in a statement Tuesday. "That’s understandable. When something like this happens at a school event, it shakes people to the core. But the justice system works best when it moves with steadiness and with principle. That’s what we’re committed to. And that’s exactly what this case deserves."

Anthony's attorney, Mike Howard, called Tuesday's indictment "an expected and routine step in the legal process."

"Karmelo and his family are confident in the justice system and the people of Collin County to be fair and impartial," Howard said. "Of course, Karmelo looks forward to his day in court. It's only in a trial that a jury will hear the full story, one that includes critical facts and context that the grand jury simply didn't get to hear."

Howard again raised Anthony's self defense claim in his statement Tuesday.

"We expect that when the full story is heard, the prosecution will not be able to rule out the reasonable doubt that Karmelo Anthony may have acted in self defense," Howard said. "Self defense is a fundamental right guaranteed every American."



Metcalf's father, Jeff Metcalf, told WFAA in a statement that he's "pleased that we are moving forward."

“With the first degree murder indictment, it now goes into the court system," Jeff Metcalf said. "I fully believe that justice will be served for Austin Metcalf. I look forward to the forthcoming trial. But it will never bring my son back.“

Under his bond conditions, Anthony is required to wear an ankle monitor and ask permission to leave his home. If Anthony violates any conditions of his bond, he will have to return to jail. He graduated and received his high school diploma in May, but did not attend the ceremony, WFAA previously reported.

Anthony allegedly confessed to the stabbing immediately after he was arrested, claiming he was defending himself from Metcalf, officials said, as WFAA previously reported.

A witness reportedly told police that Metcalf told Anthony he had to move out from under the Memorial High School tent. Anthony responded by opening his bag and reaching inside, WFAA previously reported.

"Touch me and see what happens," Anthony told Metcalf, according to a witness.

Metcalf reportedly then touched Anthony, the witness told a responding officer, and Anthony told Metcalf to punch him and see what would happen. Soon afterward, the witness said, Metcalf reportedly grabbed Anthony to tell him to move. At which point, the affidavit continues, Anthony reportedly pulled out what the witness recalled as a black knife and stabbed Metcalf once in the chest before running away.

The deep tension sparked by the incident has raised concerns that the case may be tried outside of Collin County. Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis told WFAA that the judge will make that decision at the time of trial.
 
It really pisses me off how much every other race on the planet will stick by their bad ones. They can't disavow or distance themselves from the ones who make them look bad, they're incapable of it. They all have to be good boys who dindu nuffin and are actually victims of eeeevil racism.

Fucks sake you never see this shit with white people.
 
gonna be real fuckng funny when the feral nigger gets life
Edit: to answer the poster above me it's unlikely he will get the death penalty in this case and Texas doesn't use the chair anymore
 
Not if there are enough blacks on the jury, Karmelo could have live-streamed himself planning the murder and they would still vote not guilty because muh racism or some shit. A case like this gets decided in jury selection
Reminds me of that Adam West episode of Batman where the Joker and Catwoman get aquitted because their lawyer stacked the jury with convicts.
 
Feels like there are many people looking for another Summer of Floyd. Except this case ain't the same at all. At least with Floyd you could pretend it was abuse of force, but this kid just murdered another one when he was asked to leave. There is no proof that he actually called him any slur, he was just caught stealing or trying to.

Wyświetl załącznik 9088281
Did they line up some old ass coffins or something?

Black Panthers? I saw some brothers from the Nation once upon a time, but a bunch of niggers hanging around in berets and homosexually styled leather jackets? In 2026? In fucking Texas?

Nigga, please.
Maybe they were dressed as Black Panther the Marvel movie.
 
Our societal trust is too low for jury trials to exist

I'd also argue that our societal trust is too low for bench trials too

Feels like there are many people looking for another Summer of Floyd. Except this case ain't the same at all. At least with Floyd you could pretend it was abuse of force, but this kid just murdered another one when he was asked to leave. There is no proof that he actually called him any slur, he was just caught stealing or trying to.
There's far more justification for white people to burn down black neighborhoods over this than the Floyd riots.
 
Feels like there are many people looking for another Summer of Floyd. Except this case ain't the same at all. At least with Floyd you could pretend it was abuse of force, but this kid just murdered another one when he was asked to leave. There is no proof that he actually called him any slur, he was just caught stealing or trying to.
I think a lot of people are looking for one, but I also think people are largely done dealing with mass incidents of niggerdom, the left has moved on to illegals, and the money isn't there like it was before for a lot of these large riots.

I'd love to be wrong and see another crazy summer, but I think the era of jobless bums getting government money to riot is over.
 
It really pisses me off how much every other race on the planet will stick by their bad ones. They can't disavow or distance themselves from the ones who make them look bad, they're incapable of it. They all have to be good boys who dindu nuffin and are actually victims of eeeevil racism.

Fucks sake you never see this shit with white people.
Floyd reset happened, they succeed and people secretly agree with their moral ground.
 
Excuse the question if it has already been asked and answered, but can he get the death penalty? If so, can they break out ol' Sparky?
He is a nigger 'teen' in a highly politicized trial. 0% they kill him, which is done via injections now. Best we'll see is a heavy sentences for show, they he gets out early on 'good behavior' thanks to his kike lawyer.
 
Good to hear that there’s already a groidle trying to fuck with the trial. This is an open-and-shut nigger commits murder case and we all have to wait around for the judge to say “hocus-pocus abracadabra, this is sure one guilty-ass nigra.”
 
I think a lot of people are looking for one, but I also think people are largely done dealing with mass incidents of niggerdom, the left has moved on to illegals, and the money isn't there like it was before for a lot of these large riots.

I'd love to be wrong and see another crazy summer, but I think the era of jobless bums getting government money to riot is over.
The "we murdered a white kid and got away with it" celebration riots
 
I think a lot of people are looking for one, but I also think people are largely done dealing with mass incidents of niggerdom, the left has moved on to illegals, and the money isn't there like it was before for a lot of these large riots.

I'd love to be wrong and see another crazy summer, but I think the era of jobless bums getting government money to riot is over.

I think this is closest to the truth.

BLM is dead, they fucked it by being a bunch of corrupt...well niggers. Nigger Fatigue is a real thing and right now the powers that be are more concerned with keeping their illegal voters then worrying about some random nigger that stabbed someone on camera.

I think there may be local shit but it's going to be nothing like the "summer of love"
 
Feels like there are many people looking for another Summer of Floyd. Except this case ain't the same at all. At least with Floyd you could pretend it was abuse of force, but this kid just murdered another one when he was asked to leave. There is no proof that he actually called him any slur, he was just caught stealing or trying to.


Maybe they were dressed as Black Panther the Marvel movie.
Chlorine gas will be the only cure for that courthouse.
 
It really pisses me off how much every other race on the planet will stick by their bad ones. They can't disavow or distance themselves from the ones who make them look bad, they're incapable of it. They all have to be good boys who dindu nuffin and are actually victims of eeeevil racism.

Fucks sake you never see this shit with white people.
Blacks will literally donate a million dollars to the murderer of a child because "ME BLACK HIS SKIN BE BLACK" but leftists claim it's whites who need "systemic racism" dismantled. Oh but cheering on the murder of an innocent white child and donating to him? Totally not racism. Bizarre nightmare fucking clown world we live in.
 
Stolen from elsewhere. Please note this was a live feed: if you want it in chronological order, please read from the bottom up. I may edit this to be non-retarded if I get the time.

DALLAS — The murder trial of 18-year-old Karmelo Anthony is set to begin Monday in Collin County, after last year's fatal stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a Frisco ISD track meet.
Jury selection begins Monday, June 1, with opening statements tentative set to begin Thursday, June 4. The trial is expected to last about two weeks.

WFAA will stream updates with analysis after the trial each day at 8 p.m. on our free streaming app WFAA+. Here's how to download it for free.

Frisco track meet stabbing trial: Timeline of the case​

The timeline of the case begins April 2, 2025.
Anthony, a former student at Frisco Centennial High School, is charged with murder in the April 2, 2025, killing of Metcalf, a student-athlete at Frisco Memorial High School.
Investigators say that morning, at a track meet at Kuykendall Stadium, a confrontation began under a team tent where athletes gathered during inclement weather. It ended when Metcalf was stabbed in the chest. Anthony was arrested and has claimed self-defense.

The case quickly drew intense national attention, fueled by social media debate centered on the races of the two young men, public protests, online threats and allegations of doxxing involving people connected to the proceedings.

Because Anthony was 17 at the time of the incident, Texas law allows him to be tried as an adult, and he faces a possible sentence ranging from five years to life in prison if convicted. Because the death did not meet the qualifications to be charged as a capital murder, and because of Anthony's age, the death penalty was never an option in the case.

Trial rules​

Security at the courthouse will be tight.

Judge John Roach has banned cameras, livestreams and audio recording inside the courtroom. He also designated a security perimeter around parts of the courthouse grounds barring the public — and potential demonstrators — from gathering in those areas. The judge has also issued a gag order limiting public comments about the case from attorneys, witnesses, investigators and others directly involved in the proceedings.

With public seating limited, developments in the case will come from live reporting from inside the courtroom. WFAA has a team covering the case. Collin County reporter Jobin Panicker will be inside the courtroom each day, alongside a courtroom sketch artist. Outside the courtroom, senior crime and justice reporter Rebecca Lopez will also be chronicling case developments. WFAA has also arranged for a legal expert to sit in on the proceedings each day to help provide context and analysis on the WFAA+ daily evening wrap-up, which will be hosted initially by Jason Wheeler and later by senior investigative reporter Tanya Eiserer.

June 1, 2026 - jury selection begins
2:30 p.m.
Rebecca Lopez filed her report of the afternoon's jury selection session. She noted that she did not see any of the handful of demonstrators -- some advocating for Anthony and some for Metcalf -- come in from outside to attend jury selection.

Of about 600 potential jurors summoned, about 50 were excused during today's questioning by the judge. Tomorrow, when he and the lawyers review the remaining panelists' questionnaires, they hope to have the panel cut down to 250 people for another round of voir dire on Wednesday.

Throughout the day, Judge John Roach stressed to potential jurors the importance of being fair, unbiased and able to consider only evidence heard in court.

"Would you want you sitting on the jury?" he asked at one point. "People's lives depend on the decisions you make every day in this building."

"It's OK if you heard about this case, but you have to set that aside," the judge told them. "You have to follow the law" even if you don't agree with it. (SITHRAK! note: this is not true and never has been. Jury nullification is a thing).

He then posed the question to the room: "Is there anyone who can't follow the law?" The judge did not call out any juror numbers, so presumably no one raised their hand. (The panelists were not shown on the closed-circuit video feed.)

For anyone who cannot follow the law, he told the panel, "The honorable thing to do is recuse yourself."
"If you have a disagreement with me you need to tell me," he urged them.

He told them not to rely on past press accounts they may have seen regarding what allegedly happened in the case.
He continued to stress to the pool the importance of them following his instructions and not talking about the case either inside or outside the courthouse until they are off the panel.
"I am not jacking around," he said. "Do not disobey my instructions." He reminded them they could be held in contempt and spend up to six months in jail and pay a $500 fine.

2 p.m.
Panicker reports that Judge Roach went over the courtroom rules and tentative schedule for the potential jurors. He told them that he intends to have court 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. each weekday, and on Saturdays, and that the case will last about two weeks, "through June 12th or later."
He told them that this afternoon, he wants them to finish their questionnaires, and once the are completed, then they are free to go home for the day. The judge advised them that if they have something to say, write it down in the questionnaire. The judge cautioned the panelists that whey when they leave for the day, they should not to talk about the case or do any "independent research."

He said on Tuesday, he and the lawyers will spend the day reviewing the questionnaires, and that by about 5 p.m. Tuesday, texts or emails will go out alerting those who have been selected telling them they need to return for a second round of jury selection at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday. The judge said he hopes to have the panel whittled down to about 250 people by then.
“We will have a jury picked on Wednesday," the judge said.

At one point, the prosecution team - Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis and First Assistant Bill Wirskye - introduced themselves, as did defense lawyer Mike Howard. On Wednesday, they will all presumably be able to question jurors after this initial round by the judge.

Roach told the panelists that he is not sure if the jury, once selected, will be sequestered.
A number of prospective jurors have raised concerns about their personal commitments after Judge Roach mentioned that court will last until 6 p.m. and be held on Saturdays. “I’m buying lunch every day and I’ll have bags and bags of snacks.”
The judge then dismissed the proceedings for the day, leaving jurors to work on their questionnaires.

1:30 p.m.
It's unclear if the court is planning to take a lunch break. Judge Roach continues to question jurors as they winnow down the pool of potential panelists.
Meanwhile, the scene outside the courthouse is calm.

1 p.m.
Panicker reports that because only the judge has a microphone, the feed isn't picking up what the jury pool is saying in answer to questions.
“Can you believe everything you see on social media?” Judge Roach asks potential jurors.
The judge gives the jury pool a check list:
  • Know that jury system is important
  • Be free from bias and prejudice
  • Wait to hear evidence
  • Be patient
  • Only use evidence heard or seen in court
“Is there anybody in the room who cannot follow the law?” the judge asks rhetorically.
"Anybody else see jury service like this before?” The judge answers his own question: “Me, neither.”

The judge asks: "Despite our flaws, we are the greatest country in the world. Do you agree?” Several jurors have disagreed. A few potential jurors say we are not the only great country.
One juror answers, “Our country has a long and complicated history.”

12:30 p.m.
Jobin Panicker reports that Judge John Roach Jr. is being casual and conversational with the potential jurors. The judge acknowledged that it feels like a teacher lecturing to students. Potential jurors who are answering questions are being told to say their juror number before answering.

“You are the leftovers!” the judge says, draws a small chuckle inside this courtroom, noting that all who are left at this stage have made it past the disqualifications and dismissals phase. "We won’t be here all day," the judge said to the jury pool.

The overflow courtroom where the press and public are watching the proceedings via video feed was packed this morning. Many people have left over the course of the day, leaving about 40 watching the feed as the lunch hour approaches. On the video feed, Judge Roach is pacing from side to side, talking to the jury pool about bias and prejudices.

12 p.m.
Jobin Panicker reports that the feed has now started. The judge, bailiff and court reporter are the only people visible on camera, and only the judge is mic-ed. The judge is asking jurors questions like, "Why do we have a jury system?" Potential jurors are giving their answers.
Follow along this afternoon as we continue to report the progress of jury selection.
Here's a look at the parking lot and front entrance of the Collin County courthouse today. The temperature is about 82 degrees, but it feels like it's in the 90s, according to WFAA chief photographer Cody Marcom.
Rebecca Lopez filed this quick update on jury selection.

11:30 a.m.
Rebecca Lopez reports that, although the video feed is live, there is nothing being shown in that overflow room where the press and public are gathered hoping to see jury selection. She said court personnel say that's because Judge Roach is discussing security issues with potential jurors. By law, voir dire (jury selection) has to be public and should only be closed to the public for, essentially, a specific and good reason.

Quoting the U.S. Supreme Court opinion Presley v. Georgia (2010): emphasis added
While the accused does have a right to insist that the voir dire of the jurors be public, there are exceptions to this general rule. “[T]he right to an open trial may give way in certain cases to other rights or interests, such as the defendant’s right to a fair trial or the government’s interest in inhibiting disclosure of sensitive information.” Waller, 467 U. S., at 45. “Such circumstances will be rare, however, and the balance of interests must be struck with special care.” Ibid. Waller provided standards for courts to apply before excluding the public from any stage of a criminal trial:

“[T]he party seeking to close the hearing must advance an overriding interest that is likely to be prejudiced, the closure must be no broader than necessary to protect that interest, the trial court must consider reasonable alternatives to closing the proceeding, and it must make findings adequate to support the closure.” Id., at 48.

Also:
There are no doubt circumstances where a judge could conclude that threats of improper communications with jurors or safety concerns are concrete enough to warrant closing voir dire. But in those cases, the particular interest, and threat to that interest, must “be articulated along with findings specific enough that a reviewing court can determine whether the closure order was properly entered.” Press-Enterprise I, supra, at 510; see also Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 U. S. 1, 15 (1986) (“The First Amendment right of access cannot be overcome by the conclusory assertion that publicity might deprive the defendant of [the right to a fair trial]”).

11 a.m.
Jobin Panicker says that the feed showing jury selection has now been turned on. The screen shows the state of Texas seal. Most of the people who were outside in the hallways are now coming back into the courtroom.
Earlier this morning, Panicker filed this quick report before going into the courthouse.

10:30 a.m.
Chris Sadeghi reports that there's also a group of about two dozen Anthony supporters with a drum and tambourines out by the street wearing T-shirts in support of him. Many are dressed in purple. When asked who they are affiliated with, they said they are a group that formed on social media to show support.

10 a.m.
Jobin Panicker reports that press members and the public have been escorted inside the Ceremonial Courtroom, not the 296th district court, where the trial will actually take place. That Ceremonial Courtroom is larger, and seats about 100 people. There, they will watch a feed from the central jury room where jury selection will take place. That feed is only shown inside the courthouse, and won't be streamed publicly.

About 600 people were summoned as potential jurors, according to courthouse personnel. This morning many of those prospective jurors were being escorted into the courthouse by Collin County sheriff's deputies and McKinney police officers.
Everyone passed through metal detectors entering the courthouse. Currently, there are nine members of the press and about 80 people from the public inside there Ceremonial Courtroom. People are chatting quietly.

There are two TV screens suspended in the courtroom, where the proceedings from the central jury room will be shown. Panicker said they are waiting for the feed to turn on. In the meantime, he said he's been told that the judge and staff are going through dismissals and disqualifications of potential jurors, i.e., evaluating those who say they have work conflicts, child care issues, etc.

9:30 a.m.
WFAA's legal expert today will be Vanita Parker. She started her career as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County where she worked from 1997-2009. She's now doing defense work in private practice. She will appear on WFAA+'s stream tonight at 8 p.m. for a wrap up of the day's events, alongside our reporters.

9 a.m.
A large pool of potential Collin County jurors was set to show up to the courthouse this morning. They will undergo questioning by Judge John Roach Jr., the lawyers for Karmelo Anthony and prosecutors to determine whether they will be able to be one of the 12 jurors in the case. The judge will also select a number of alternates to listen to all the evidence in the case if one of the jurors were to become sick or otherwise is not able to serve out the whole trial.

Jurors typically fill out a questionnaire beforehand, giving the lawyers an idea of how fair they can be, whether they've interacted with law enforcement and the justice system before, and, whether they've heard anything about this particular case. Potential jurors need not be totally unfamiliar with the case. But, they must demonstrate, and swear under oath, that they can be fair and impartial, and can set aside any opinions they might have formed about the case and only consider the facts they hear in the courtroom.

8:30 a.m.
WFAA has had a crew out at the Collin County since before dawn. Chris Sadeghi reports that people were lining up at 6 a.m. to try to get a seat inside the courthouse. By about 7 a.m., a few demonstrators were out along along the road leading to the courthouse with a sign that says "justice for Austin Metcalf." He said security is visibly increased at the courthouse.
Jobin Panicker is making his way into the courthouse, and both he and Rebecca Lopez have seats inside the courtroom today. Stand by for updates all day long on the latest from inside - and outside - the courtroom.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole