Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Bro, I watched Kpop Demon Hunters because my cousins love that movie. I really hate how queers turn every fucking story that has nothing to do with being gay or trans as some sort of gay or trans allegory. Rumi's story has nothing to do with with being some closet lesbian or trans, but because the story has to do with "Being who you are and not hiding your true self" that automatically makes her an "LGBTQ" icon. These people do the same thing with characters like Elsa from Frozen, Ariel from Little Mermaid, etc.
Don’t forget about all the officially licensed SJW art. This is an actual MTG card that I recently saw Twitter arguing over. Wyświetl załącznik 9084032
Don’t forget about all the officially licensed SJW art. This is an actual MTG card that I recently saw Twitter arguing over. Wyświetl załącznik 9084032
This would be funny for 3 seconds as a social media post made by a gay man. It's just overpoweringly awful to capitalize off it and force players to actually have it in their opponent's decks.
God i fucking hate the people who think Nia is trans
Also "Accidental Transgender Allegory = I'm taking this character's story that has little to no connection to transexuality and stretching the meaning of it to fit my worldview"
Don’t forget about all the officially licensed SJW art. This is an actual MTG card that I recently saw Twitter arguing over. Wyświetl załącznik 9084032
This would be funny for 3 seconds as a social media post made by a gay man. It's just overpoweringly awful to capitalize off it and force players to actually have it in their opponent's decks.
I just remember some of those aforementioned Twitter arguments including things like “Well it’s not like anyone’s forcing you to use it!” And “There’s another card with a guy with a bunch of scantily clad women, I don’t see you complaining!” Shit like that.
Those are just emblems, not CoA's. Half of the monsters are not blazoned correctly (Impossible charge positions and body parts sticking out of the escutcheons) and don't actually represent what they're assigned to, or at least, it's hard to tell why they were chosen for either thing.
Since the artist wants those to be wearable pins, I'm once again reminded of common gay discourse - about them being discriminated for having certain symbols and styles of clothing. Stuff like this will make religious people even more convinced that these people are demon posssesed\opressed (Which they are) and secular citizens will just have a negative connotation toward them; And then they wonder why everyone's so wary around them.
Back to the illustrations themselves - maybe they were making a statement by not conforming to traditional heraldic rules?
Have the Coat of Arms of Canongate (That's in Scotland) as eye-bleach:
So some random Twitter user asked the creator of this show if the character was bisexual and the creator responded by saying she wasn't and that she's straight.
Needless to say that the creator said this on the first day of pride month and people are outraged by it.
Its ok "I live" for now because the creator meant that nothing was confirmed on if the character was bi,
"Guys, my over the top reaction was just joking! I wasn't planning on attacking the creator over it"! Even if this user wasn't planning to, we have cases where queers have threatened the creators for not making a character gay or trans and refuting their headcanons.
Either way, I always found the "Its a joke" whenever they give an over the top meltdown over a character not being gay or trans a cope. I remember one woman was mentally losing it when a female character she headcanons as a lesbian was dating a guy and she started acting like she never liked the show and started actively hating it.
So some random Twitter user asked the creator of this show if the character was bisexual and the creator responded by saying she wasn't and that she's straight. Wyświetl załącznik 9085356
Needless to say that the creator said this on the first day of pride month and people are outraged by it.
Its ok "I live" for now because the creator meant that nothing was confirmed on if the character was bi, Wyświetl załącznik 9085365
"Guys, my over the top reaction was just joking! I wasn't planning on attacking the creator over it"! Even if this user wasn't planning to, we have cases where queers have threatened the creators for not making a character gay or trans and refuting their headcanons. Wyświetl załącznik 9085363
Either way, I always found the "Its a joke" whenever they give an over the top meltdown over a character not being gay or trans a cope. I remember one woman was mentally losing it when a female character she headcanons as a lesbian was dating a guy and she started acting like she never liked the show and started actively hating it.
Yeah but the problem with these people is that if you give them an inch, they take the whole mile. There are a few shows where it has quite a few gay couples on it but these people hyper focus on the straight characters and try to find anything to confirm the character isn't straight. For a lot of these people, it was never about representation, but turning shows into whatever queer fantasy show that's exactly like their AU. Why so many online people care so much about wanting every character to be some flavor of LGBT is beyond me.
A constant theme with art (and I am using that term INCREDIBLY loosely) like this, if you removed the text and context people would think that it was a transphobic caricature and not someone genuinely saying "thiz iz me guyz" which to the public gives them a pass to draw trans people in the most horrific ways possible whereas if your average Joe drew that their post would get removed for hate speech.
Not only is that not the newest acronym (newest I've seen was that stupid MMIW2SLGBTQIAP+), it's not even new. When I was in the gay straight alliance back in high school, LGBTQIA was a long but recognized acronym and a lot of people considered the A to mean "Ally." Of course it also meant Asexual depending who you asked, but at the time it felt like the acronym or the flag weren't that important.
I think that's something that's annoying about the modern movement, they don't have real issues anymore and just keep going balls to the wall for non-issues like a better flag or acronym. We used to give a fuck about not getting spit on or killed by classmates, not being fired or refused housing, being allowed to get married and visit our partners in the hospital, or even adopt children and start families. Now that those have been more or less solved in America, everyone's over-focusing on the little unimportant shit.
Not only is that not the newest acronym (newest I've seen was that stupid MMIW2SLGBTQIAP+), it's not even new. When I was in the gay straight alliance back in high school, LGBTQIA was a long but recognized acronym and a lot of people considered the A to mean "Ally." Of course it also meant Asexual depending who you asked, but at the time it felt like the acronym or the flag weren't that important.
I think that's something that's annoying about the modern movement, they don't have real issues anymore and just keep going balls to the wall for non-issues like a better flag or acronym. We used to give a fuck about not getting spit on or killed by classmates, not being fired or refused housing, being allowed to get married and visit our partners in the hospital, or even adopt children and start families. Now that those have been more or less solved in America, everyone's over-focusing on the little unimportant shit.
The problem with the modern movement is that its adding way too many new sexualities and genders to where you have to ask the question "How do you define queer"? I have noticed that nowadays people are questioning sexualities like demisexual and wondering if it even should be considered LGBT because this is a sexuality where you can be straight but not have a sexual attraction with people unless you get to know them more. But what exactly is queer about a sexuality where it is normal for most people? I herd the argument that demisexuals face discrimination but who is discriminating someone for wanting to get to know someone first before being attracted to them? Also, pansexual, polysexual, Omnisexual, and any similar sexualities being added for every small difference and its like "Does this really need different labels"? The entire modern LGBTQ movement is finding issues that aren't there or not enough to argue that said people are oppressed.
>art shows care bears (who have nothing to do with these faggots really) replacing the ripped union jack with a progress pride flag like it should be the international flag served by all countries and the world in general.
>has #fuck maga in it
Even in non-American hate propaganda...they can't stop hating Trump huh?
