💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Kurt needs to be a step ahead. If he comes out and says Nick is correct, Nick will say "See, I never lie, not even about Kurt." Nick wants Kurt to stand up for him because of the joy it would bring Nick.

If Kurt wants to address it, he should do it with that in mind. I think his best choice would be "Nick is a lying liar who lies and I have no reason to address anything he says."
This shows the single minded madness of Rekieta. He has all the fragments of his previous life and to this day thinks with the right magic words it will all whoosh back to how it was. The fundamental dishonesty of his whole fake existence is irrelevant he just wants to go back to being the idol of dozens.
 
Nick addresses the Early-Leopard, he confirms it real.
He downplays it as "wanting to talk about the topic, which is something personal (Aaron) instead of me".

Nick, you were using it to harass Aaron anonymously and promote yourself, you sad fucking cuck.
He signs off the topic with "c'est la vie", which is Balldospeak for "I'm not mad, your mad".
It’s a dead horse at this point, but if this is how he deals with his male lovers imagine how he acts with his female lovers.
I’m one of those idealistic people who thinks that at the end of the day people get what’s coming to them. Especially if God fires a warning shot and you just ignore that and double down on your behavior. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but I truly believe that what goes around comes around and one day Nick will find that out the hard way.
 
It’s a dead horse at this point, but if this is how he deals with his male lovers imagine how he acts with his female lovers.
I’m one of those idealistic people who thinks that at the end of the day people get what’s coming to them. Especially if God fires a warning shot and you just ignore that and double down on your behavior. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but I truly believe that what goes around comes around and one day Nick will find that out the hard way.
Rekieta is a lunatic and a gambler so he takes risks. Math is against him because each risk has a chance of being the one to give him the jackpot. It will happen.
 
nigger fix your fucking mic setup

Nick has showercalled Kurt through Nate, apparently to "inform" Kurt that the Turtlelogs are making up lies.
He has not received a response from via Nate, suggesting he will directly showercall Kurt if he does not get a response.
Imagine you not only have the misfortune to get a stalker, but they're not even some hot psycho BPD bitch, it's just some homo who desperately wants you to fuck him in the ass because you appeared on his stream years ago unpaid.
 
Kurt needs to be a step ahead. If he comes out and says Nick is correct, Nick will say "See, I never lie, not even about Kurt." Nick wants Kurt to stand up for him because of the joy it would bring Nick.

If Kurt wants to address it, he should do it with that in mind. I think his best choice would be "Nick is a lying liar who lies and I have no reason to address anything he says."
To be perfectly clear here, Nina's story was that Kurt sat in Nick's house and watched while Nick did untoward things involving minors and drugs.

I could see why somebody might feel a compulsion to refute an allegation like that. They would do it to defend themselves, and not Nick.

But, as it stands now, it's completely unsubstantiated horseshit from a wine mom, in which the two other people in the podcast where it was uttered have disavowed (K definitely, and Kate supposedly), so ignoring it completely is really the best opinion.

Basically what Nick is not doing.
 
Screen Shot 2026-05-31 at 22.15.26.png
X | A

Rekieta Law - We Going Live On a Sunday - BRING YOUR MEMBERS - TurtleBoy Stream Fallout, More ...png
 
I could see why somebody might feel a compulsion to refute an allegation like that. They would do it to defend themselves, and not Nick.
The way I see it is that Nick doesn't care what they say about him. He will get off on making Kurt uncomfortable both by highlighting the claims and also getting Kurt to defend Nick. Nick gets off on making people uncomfortable and he is repeating this nonsense just because of this. And I still think Kurts best response, if any, is to simply call Nick a lying liar who lies and say there is no reason to address anything he brings up, ever. Kurt shouldn't be goaded into addressing the wine moms, defending Nick or defending himself.
 
He basically said "I made it so I could comment on a certain subjects without my name attached to it".
I assume it could be viewed as an admission that he was willfully attempting to circumvent the court order and also break the TRO.
Oh fuck yeah! He’s just admitted to violating the TRO. I’ll be amazed if the Judge does anything it being Shitesota, but you never know.
 
Oh fuck yeah! He’s just admitted to violating the TRO. I’ll be amazed if the Judge does anything it being Shitesota, but you never know.
Sometimes, from the way he acts, there are times I ponder whether Nick wants to permanently lose his law license, or go to jail/prison...

But then I think... he's too much of an egotistical maniac for that. I think he actually thinks he's invincible.

He sure picked the right state to be a complete fuckwad in though. I'll give him that.
 
The way I see it is that Nick doesn't care what they say about him. He will get off on making Kurt uncomfortable both by highlighting the claims and also getting Kurt to defend Nick. Nick gets off on making people uncomfortable and he is repeating this nonsense just because of this. And I still think Kurts best response, if any, is to simply call Nick a lying liar who lies and say there is no reason to address anything he brings up, ever. Kurt shouldn't be goaded into addressing the wine moms, defending Nick or defending himself.

Kurt should not engage--if only because he is the kind of personality that True Crime Karens will hate and choose to fixate on, and he will lash out. He should avoid engagment.
 
Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but I truly believe that what goes around comes around and one day Nick will find that out the hard way.
That's happened though. He literally dresses from thrift stores, looks like a complete faggot, and thinks he is somehow owning people by dressing like an absolute fag. The logic here is incomprehensible but he actually thinks that.
 
"They can't be a jury of my peers because how many of them were the number one super chatted weird, funny guy who stole Aaron's wife?"
Balldo gets much of his identity from the “stolen wife,” fantasy, as if that was some big brag. It’s just fragile & pathetic.
Did that shit actually happen?
I have a theory that a similar party may have happened, but not with Kurt. It would have been that party he had with Valhalla Awaits, Coomalot, & some unnamed parties, in the Playboy themed Air BnB, during the time Nick had that fan meet-up in Vegas, the year before his arrest, months before dating the Imholte’s, iirc. It was clear something off putting, illegal, or offensive happened at that get together. The rumor might be coming from that party, as it was at a time when Kurt believed Nick was his buddy, & he was open to spending time in person, That Valhalla guy had a very suspicious reaction to the party, claiming he had big dirt on Nick afterwards, as a tease, on Nicks show. It was interesting to me how Nick ran to Valhalla (of all people) after this new rumor surfaced. Could be nothing, could be something.
To be perfectly clear here, Nina's story was that Kurt sat in Nick's house and watched while Nick did untoward things involving minors and drugs.
I’m thinking the new wine-mom brigade may have got some details mixed up, which would surprise no one. I remember something awkward happening at the party at the Air BnB with Valhalla Awaits, that I mentioned just above, and maybe something previously unknown publicly has crossed wires with the behind the scenes grapevine, to give the story of Kurt & Nick partying with illegal activity that made some attendees uncomfortable, but perhaps it’s just the cast that the wine-moms got confused about. It sure does muddy things when people add made up shit to bolster claims. I’m absolutely speculating here, to be clear.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole