💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

lol this woman doesn’t care about the niggers or she’d name names and stop playing coy with her word games. Her main grievance seems to be that people don’t follow her blindly or platform her. She cares enough about her reputation not to completely nuke it by pointing fingers, this vague slimey feminine whining is supposed to endear her to her audience I guess. What a retard.
 
Meanwhile, Ricky Two Chins is still assmad, drunk and fat. He’s fatly seething about the current settlement between his floppy tits and the shithole that is Milwaukee right now. Nice calm composure, stupid.
IMG_5743.jpegIMG_5743.jpegIMG_5744.jpegIMG_5744.jpegIMG_5745.jpegIMG_5745.jpegIMG_5749.jpegIMG_5749.jpegIMG_5748.jpegIMG_5748.jpegIMG_5747.jpegIMG_5747.jpegIMG_5746.jpegIMG_5746.jpegIMG_5752.jpegIMG_5752.jpegIMG_5751.jpegIMG_5751.jpegIMG_5750.jpegIMG_5750.jpegIMG_5753.jpeg
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
What would fat pat buy with 150k?
A second, better rustang.
New pepperoni grinder?
The only grinding Patrick does, is being grinded by other men in the sauna.
Extra strong suspension for his scooty bike?
He does not need extra suspension, as he has never gained a single pound since high school, stalker.
Sex change for Nikkki?
Big Nicholas does not exist, as has been explained many times to your tiny delusional criminal brain. This is how you stuck your tongue on the frozen bars of your prison cage, chd. Enjoy hypothermia.
 
Electric Callboy is a great band if you like that kind of music. They have a reputation of being excellent live. I’m jealous of Pat *sigh*

How can I be jealous of someone who unironically tweets stuff like this
IMG_3174.jpeg IMG_3176.jpeg

Can’t believe we’re being robbed of a jury trial. Pat won’t win Lolcow of the year like this.
 
There's a lot of speculation because of the tight schedule surrounding it that the settlement was Patrick's idea once he heard his tweets and "wrongdoings or crimes" were on the table for evidence of perpetuating/bringing this upon himself and not the fault of the city. I think that's at least partly true, but I don't remember seeing anyone speculate that it's not just that it would be public record, but that the stalkers would see it. In person.

Imagine you're Patrick: you're the machoiest guy around. You fuck with skill and enthusiasm. You're trying to bring the city to task for failing you and not killing your stalkers for you (then imprisoning them). You go to trial, the defense presents their evidence, and for the jury (and gallery) to see are tweets of you saying "you are not my toilet, stalker." and your arrest and police record(s) including when you threatened your wife, your unborn child, and her soon-to-be new husband. At any point during this, you hear a bunch of quiet snickers and a cough trying to stifle it from behind you. They're here. The stalker childs. You said they wouldn't be allowed and they'd be arrested, but here they are. They're watching, they're seeing you get humiliated. And worse: they're going to keep you up until 4 AM with how many times you're going to need to reply to correct the record. I feel like Pat would interrupt the proceedings and turn, point, and screech at them like he was a pod person from Invasion of the Body Snatchers. "ARREST THESE STALKERS IMMEDIATELY. NOBODY WOULD LAUGH AT SOMETHING SO TERRIBLY SERIOUS OTHER THAN MY STALKERS! I COMMAND THEE!" And then nothing would happen. Even with all of his denials that would follow on Xitter, he'd never live it down. It would be a worse narc injury than when Ade left him.
 
I do have to wonder how much they've paid in legal/attorney fees and court costs. May cut into their settlement unless they include it in the settlement.

@Useful_Mistake would you or another legal kiwi have any insight into this?
I'd bet it's on contingency. That's how civil rights lawyers usually work because most of their clients are indigent and of a certain demographic. They can come to any arrangement they like, though, and it's possible Rick paid an asshole tax.

If you were talking fair market value for legal services and were actually paying for it, like the City would be if Pat won at trial, I doubt you'd be looking at anything less than six figures, for a fair amount of motion practice and taking it all the way through discovery, summary judgment motions, and ending up on the eve of trial.

Since I find it highly doubtful that Rick would have been able to afford fair market value for this representation (which has been pretty good to get a joke of a case like this to the eve of trial), it's probably contingency and he's paid nothing or near to nothing (perhaps Rick has had to cover costs).

The settlement can do pretty much what the parties agree to, though.

tl;dr I dunno lol.
 
I'd bet it's on contingency. That's how civil rights lawyers usually work because most of their clients are indigent and of a certain demographic. They can come to any arrangement they like, though, and it's possible Rick paid an asshole tax.

If you were talking fair market value for legal services and were actually paying for it, like the City would be if Pat won at trial, I doubt you'd be looking at anything less than six figures, for a fair amount of motion practice and taking it all the way through discovery, summary judgment motions, and ending up on the eve of trial.

Since I find it highly doubtful that Rick would have been able to afford fair market value for this representation (which has been pretty good to get a joke of a case like this to the eve of trial), it's probably contingency and he's paid nothing or near to nothing (perhaps Rick has had to cover costs).

The settlement can do pretty much what the parties agree to, though.

tl;dr I dunno lol.
I think its safe to say that Pat wasted $100k+ of someone else's money for the third time.
 
The one thing I’m curious about is if the depositions and such will remain sealed. Anyone have any insight on this?

There's a lot of speculation because of the tight schedule surrounding it that the settlement was Patrick's idea once he heard his tweets and "wrongdoings or crimes" were on the table for evidence of perpetuating/bringing this upon himself and not the fault of the city.

I asked this earlier, but if the plaintiffs were the ones losing their nerve, wouldn’t the lawsuit be withdrawn? Or does them withdrawing mean that they have recourse to refile if someone impersonates his wife’s tampon and he gets into an especially surly mood?

If the city basically went “look, we’re going to publicly embarrass you so even if you win you’ll still lose” that would still constitute as a settlement, yes?
 
I mean he was right though. Like after the third swatting maybe the city should figure out something is up with that particular address and stop sending armed hitsquads to his house.
Thread regulars will tell you that being repeatedly bothered by local police is actually completely fine and above board because Fatrick is like a liar and fat or something
 
Christ ... he's going to be absolutely fucking insufferable now (more so than usual).
It's going to be ridiculously milky and I am here for it.

Maybe jet skis? An RV?
It depends how much pocket money he's given, but I could see him wasting a bunch of money on a used fixer upper money pit boat.

Emily Bell is in the middle of crashing out
Can you point me to posts about what she actually did? I know she's insufferable but there has to be more to it.

If the city basically went “look, we’re going to publicly embarrass you so even if you win you’ll still lose” that would still constitute as a settlement, yes?
I think this is a conversation their lawyer had to have with them. To lay out how damaging Pat's behavior is in front of the both of them. A conversation I would have paid good money to observe. The settlement may not even be financial as such, more of a 'we won't seek costs if you go away'.
A settlement is not necessarily a 'win' for either side.
 
I think its safe to say that Pat wasted $100k+ of someone else's money for the third time.
Not really how it works usually.
I asked this earlier, but if the plaintiffs were the ones losing their nerve, wouldn’t the lawsuit be withdrawn?
After a responsive pleading by the other side you can no longer just dismiss your case. The other side has to agree.
Thread regulars will tell you that being repeatedly bothered by local police is actually completely fine and above board because Fatrick is like a liar and fat or something
Or they'll try to explain the law on qualified immunity and then it will go in one ear and out the other.
It depends how much pocket money he's given, but I could see him wasting a bunch of money on a used fixer upper money pit boat.
I bet he could blow it all on a cheeseburger.
If the city basically went “look, we’re going to publicly embarrass you so even if you win you’ll still lose” that would still constitute as a settlement, yes?
Literally anything the parties agree to that ends the case is a settlement.

(Though I'll note a threat as direct as that borders on extortion so they probably wouldn't say it that way.)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole