Greer v. Aguilar, 2:25-cv-02581 - Another lawsuit from Greer, this time it's about whores

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Crusty didn't get his emergency motion for a whore initiative!

Will he not be able to get his whore question on the ballot for 2026?

The whores must be absolutely crushed!!

The whorer, the absolute whorer of it all!! Won't someone think of the whores!!!

 

[DavidS877]

Crusty didn't get his emergency motion for a whore initiative!

Will he not be able to get his whore question on the ballot for 2026?

The whores must be absolutely crushed!!

It's funny how the court doesn't grant emergency motions if you don't actually serve the defendant.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

It's funny how the court doesn't grant emergency motions if you don't actually serve the defendant.

Service is just one of those unimportant things that is subject to excusable neglect. Move on!

 

[RodgerDodger]

Service is just one of those unimportant things that is subject to excusable neglect. Move on!

Funniest thing ever would be for the Nevada Sec State to hire Hardin.

 

[AnOminous]

Funniest thing ever would be for the Nevada Sec State to hire Hardin.

He's done government work. He was chief prosecutor for a county in Virginia.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

It's been what, almost a month since we've seen any activity on this? What is the hold up, is there some future conference I forgot about?

 

[DavidS877]

It's been what, almost a month since we've seen any activity on this? What is the hold up, is there some future conference I forgot about?

Greer has to serve the Nevada Secretary of State the third amended complaint.
More specifically he needs to serve them correctly, which he failed to do on the first servicing. This time he hasn't even half-assed the service yet.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Greer has to serve the Nevada Secretary of State the amended complaint.
More specifically he needs to serve them correctly, which he failed to do on the first servicing. This time he hasn't even half-assed the service yet.

I wonder why he hasn't? He would have to demonstrate proper service by uploading the relevant documents to the ECF, right? Does he think he's too late to make it for this election, so he's going to give up and try again in 2028?

Crusty needs to realize, if he makes the case now in 2026, or 2028, or 2038, or 2238, the fact that that there is proof that he got the signatures in Lincoln county means that a lawsuit brought at any point is outright fraud upon the court and brought for an inappropriate purpose. Time doesn't change that. There isn't any point now or in the future when he can bring this lawsuit where it would be proper and not fraud. Crusty's own success in Lincoln county essentially bars him from ever pursuing a change to the law through the courts for all time.

 

[DavidS877]

I wonder why he hasn't. Does he think he'd too late to make it for this election, so he's going to give up and try again in 2028?

It was too late when he started in January 2026 instead of January 2025, which he should know by his other cases in federal court.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

It was too late when he started in January 2026 instead of January 2025, which he should know by his other cases in federal court.

I guess Crusty's ego prevents him from asking for a dismissal without prejudice so he can try again, he's rather just let it languish.

Of course, it could just as easily be that he is way beyond his 3 e-mail a day limit.

 

[DavidS877]

I guess Crusty's ego prevents him from asking for a dismissal without prejudice so he can try again, he's rather just let it languish.

Of course, it could just as easily be that he is way beyond his 3 e-mail a day limit.

If he was smart, hahahahahahahahahahaha, he would proceed anyway to get the process "fixed" by 2028. He's already wasted the $405 on it.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

If he was smart, hahahahahahahahahahaha, he would proceed anyway to get the process "fixed" by 2028. He's already wasted the $405 on it.

Good point. I guess I was thinking about the fact that he can't possibly win. Might as well fail now.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

Shit Lips has been deafeningly silent on all fronts. Just whining about Taco Bell workers and a plightsperg in Mr. Green vs Moon. I don't think homelessness is going for him a week this time as it did before.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I guess Crusty's ego prevents him from asking for a dismissal without prejudice so he can try again, he's rather just let it languish.

Of course, it could just as easily be that he is way beyond his 3 e-mail a day limit.

Does not actually. He requested such dismissals in the past, namely in the hooker/pornstar lawsuit.

 

[RodgerDodger]

My theory is he's not IFP in this case. So he needs to pay for proper Service to the Sec State and AG. And he's currently unemploye d and living in his car.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

My theory is he's not IFP in this case. So he needs to pay for proper Service to the Sec State and AG. And he's currently unemploye d and living in his car.

Is there a limit to how long one has to perform proper service?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Is there a limit to how long one has to perform proper service?

I think I read its 120 days in Nevada?

 

[DavidS877]

Is there a limit to how long one has to perform proper service?

90 days. I assume he also need a new summons for the amended complaint since the defendant never appeared, since they weren't properly served. Which he hasn't even requested yet.

 

[Kosher Dill]

Is there a limit to how long one has to perform proper service?

4 hours or until the Olive Garden closes.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

90 days. I assume he also need a new summons for the amended complaint since the defendant never appeared, since they weren't properly served. Which he hasn't even requested yet.

Is it 90 days from initial filing, or is it 90 days from last amended complaint?