Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
I'm not going to hold me my breath, because the tardshield is strong on this one.
I think there is something you are missing.
At this point it does not even matter if he prevails in his copyright claims. The counter claims will nullify any monetary gains he hopes to collect. Worse, the counter claim plaintiff is also demanding a Jury Trial. Which means the tard guarding is over. Greer may get his wish and the court wash their hands of this mess and schedule a trial date on all issues. His claims and the counter claims.
I think this is true but you didn't explain the point enough in my opinion.

The thinking behind this case on the judge's part is likely that they don't want to make any kind of decision that could end up being overturned by the 10th circuit. So they want a Jury trial. Judges like Jury decisions because they didn't make any big decisions but the jury did completely removing responsibility for the outcome of the case. But Null and Hardin don't want a jury trial for two reasons, its expensive even if they win and they are worried about being fucked over by the judges. Null should win a trial but if the judges rules against him enough then he could possibly lose. The judges have made promises and fucked over Null repeatedly so this is not a paranoid fear. So this case is stuck in limbo.

This counter-claim allows Null and Hardin to accomplish 3 things they want. First is it allows Null and Hardin to see if the judges are actually trying to bend the rules to screw over Null by abusing the legal process. It could be the judges are just protecting themselves in this case. If not then at least Null and Hardin know it is completely unfair and can proceed along those lines. Secondly if the judges are just covering their asses this allows Null and Hardin to conduct a jury trial that they would obviously win which would allow the judges to wash their hands of this case and the consequences of it without being slapped by the 10th. The final thing is this would allow Null to actually make some money off of Russel Greer which would recoup at least some losses making the jury trial less expensive.

I thought at least some of this was clear when I made my short little post after this happened. I guess I should have elaborated. This is why I feel optimistic even if there is a chance this doesn't end up accomplishing much.
 
I still can't believe it's basically allowed(as in not severely punished immediately) for the opposition in a legal case to just constantly target the lawyer and try to have them disbarred, contacting their firm, constantly demanding the judge to remove the specific opposition lawyer, it seems like something that should be legally coded in as obvious malice since it's literally obvious malice because if there was any merit in their own case they would be more concerned with the details and evidence their providing rather than trying to snipe the enemy lawyer lol
I see it more and more frequently. In a Florida case involving the same exact Magistrate Judge who kicked this shit-show back to Utah, the Defendant's lawyer keeps trying to get the Plaintiff's lawyer kicked off the case, even going so far as to accuse him of fraud upon the court in counterclaims. It is also the same sort of situation in a disbarment hearing of another lawyer in Florida back in 2016 because he was conspiring to get opponent's counsel arrested so that he would be thrown off the case as well. Turns out that the bar takes unkindly to lawyers trying to get other lawyers arrested for fraudulent reasons. Go figure.
 
ECF 458
2026-03-31-000476.png

The Magistrate got scared of discovery, and paused it until he resolves every other pending issue.
 
if I were a prudent sort of judge I'd pick the ones I could rule on and then deny swathes of them as moot where able. Why trudge through 20 plightsperging filings when you can rule on one or two and call them all moot because you did/didn't grant the originating issue? Like all the sperging about witness disclosure and removing Hardin.
 
So, the next thing we can actually expect is Greeeeeee's response to the counterclaim and reply to the answer I think. In addition to whatever unscheduled reeeeeee-ing that may be filed.

We won't hear from the court until 2027 at the earliest.
 
"At that time, the court will lift the stay and address scheduling."

Which would seem to indicate that all pending motions related to dismissing the case for refusal to obey orders will be denied, or at least addressed in such a way as to keep the fucking case open, with gritted teeth and determination to plow ahead to jury trial regardless of Greer's continuing recalcitrance. Fuck me.
 
Of course they'd give Shitlips a reprieve right when needling him with one of his many lolsuits would be the most beneficial. *sigh*
 
"At that time, the court will lift the stay and address scheduling."

Which would seem to indicate that all pending motions related to dismissing the case for refusal to obey orders will be denied, or at least addressed in such a way as to keep the fucking case open, with gritted teeth and determination to plow ahead to jury trial regardless of Greer's continuing recalcitrance. Fuck me.
Not necessarily. They can dismiss the claim but do discovery on the counterclaim. They're effectively stuck with two lawsuits now.
Rainbow stickers below.
 
Except the court has dropped a "a lot of funnys gonna be happening, boyyyyyyys" on us. Bennett has decided to resolve this all himself. That's a step up from them not doing shit like before.
So we're in a Tardin situation? I'll see it when I believe it.
1774973844771.png
Posting "I will rule on the outstanding motions and there never will be a scheduling conference" would give the plot away, so I understand the red text worded as is either way.

I wonder if Greer "missed" the counterclaim and is going to sperg out at the judge for daring to say the stay is still valid? How can there be a stay on discovery when Plaintiff is homeless and can't discover a place to stay?
 
I wonder if Greer "missed" the counterclaim and is going to sperg out at the judge for daring to say the stay is still valid? How can there be a stay on discovery when Plaintiff is homeless and can't discover a place to stay?
Greer filed a motion begging the court to maintain the stay, so I'm not sure he's gonna complain rn
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole