Liz Fong-Jones / 方禮真 / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey / Honeycomb.io Field CTO - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku 0 0
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wyróżnienie
Sooty Soot powiedział(a):
BREAKING NEWS: ELLIOT WILLIAM FONG OF 332 W PENDER ST VANCOUVER BRITISH COLUMBIA V6E 4S9, CANADA, HAS JUST GONE TO INDIA AND IS NOW LIKELY TO GET GANGRAPED BY A PACK OF MARAUDING HINDU BRAHMIN STUDS
Wyświetl załącznik 8763955
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Even jeets have standards and won't touch him. But he's probably going there to hire an army of keyboard warriors. Does Null proactively ban Indian IP addresses?
 
DavidS877 powiedział(a):
Apparently this was what he was doing at SRECON 2026 Americas, when he wasn't committing consent accidents.


Videos not yet posted.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Oh my god. Can we just compare the two bios for Daria and Liz for a second?

Daria’s bio:
Daria is a Principal Site Reliability Engineer in Observability Engineering in Azure. With a background in Applied Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, and Music, Daria is passionate about machine learning, diversity in tech, and opera. In her current role, Daria is focused on changing organisational culture, processes, and platforms to improve service reliability and on-call experience. She has spoken at conferences on various aspects of reliability and human factors that play a key role in engineering practices, and has written for O'Reilly.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Includes detailed background information and interests that are generally relevant to the field. Does include an interest about opera which is a tasteful personal touch and follows from her background in opera. The rest details her current projects and past speaking and writing experience for some extra cred. Overall, a very professional bio with no major red flags to indicate Daria is an insufferable freak.

And then we have Liz’s bio:
Liz is a developer advocate, labor and ethics organizer, and Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) with over two decades of experience. She is currently a Technical Fellow at honeycomb.io, and previously was an SRE working on products ranging from the Google Cloud Load Balancer to Google Flights.

She lives in Vancouver, BC with her wife Elly and partners, and in Sydney, NSW. She plays classical piano, leads an EVE Online alliance, and advocates for transgender rights.

Connect:
Bluesky
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Immediately begins with vague advocacy bullshit that is unrelated to the topic of the discussion. The rest of the paragraph does include relevant experience and roles but it lacks specificity and doesn’t include anything to bolster credibility.

And then holy shit does it take a bad turn. “Lives in … with her wife Elly…”, okay, if you knew nothing about Liz you’d probably be thinking okay how is this persons sexuality relevant? And then the next bit hits you, “… and partners…”. Oh great, it’s one of those polycule freaks, again how is this at all relevant to the topic of the talk? The next bit about playing classical piano is fine, very vanilla. The bit about EVE is a little unnecessary and approaching unprofessional, but sometimes people like to include quirky stuff so it’s forgivable. And finally, the last bit, “and advocates for transgender rights.” If you knew nothing about Liz, your brain should be sending multiple warning signals at this point. It also recolors the entire rest of the bio. What you thought was a lesbian is actually just a man in a dress, who is living with other men in dresses doing god knows what revolting shit.

The whole second paragraph is utterly unprofessional and is not relevant. There is no need to inject your sexuality or other perversions into every aspect of your life. But for Liz and other gross trannies, that’s the whole point. They have nothing except for being a gross tranny. It’s so vile.

And finally it ends with a link to Liz’s bluesky, not a LinkedIn or professional email or other way to professionally connect. No, it’s a link to his personal bluesky so you can read about his smug bullshit or other gross tranny stuff. How anyone gives this retard the time of day is beyond me.
 
enamelled toothbrush powiedział(a):
And finally, the last bit, “and advocates for transgender rights.” If you knew nothing about Liz, your brain should be sending multiple warning signals at this point. It also recolors the entire rest of the bio. What you thought was a lesbian is actually just a man in a dress, who is living with other men in dresses doing god knows what revolting shit.

The whole second paragraph is utterly unprofessional and is not relevant. There is no need to inject your sexuality or other perversions into every aspect of your life. But for Liz and other gross trannies, that’s the whole point. They have nothing except for being a gross tranny. It’s so vile
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
what I find fascinating about Erriot - and other terminally online tranny niggers - is how every goddamn fucking sentence they speak or post anywhere is this smug, condescending, ongoing lecture *informing* people about deviant tranny pervert behaviors as if we're all just dying to be *educated* about how troons molest each other

like bitch, please- you're all gross disgusting faggot freaks, you reek and you look like victims of a bus accident. In saner times nobody would listen to your shit for 10s, you'd either be chained to the wall in a max security asylum with a gag in your mouth, or face down in the bottom of a ditch on the wrong end of a brick to save bullets because you're not worth the $0.20 a .22 LR round costs

nobody likes you, you fucking freak. Shut the fuck up you nutless chink
 
DairyFarmsWholeMilk powiedział(a):
Yeah, I left this a few days to see if anyone would provide anything substantive.
It seems my assumption was correct.
The claim is just the general hatred of fong and a wilful hyperbolic interpretation of a tweet. So I am going to conclude that there is no evidence of r*pe.

Do better
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...


Still feeling validated on this,

Yall are petty poo touchers and mad when someone does the same to you
 
Someone that claims to have worked alongside Blockhead believes that he was the one responsible for leaking the James Demore memo from years ago:

I'll keep it short, cause I don't want to spend like 40 mins typing it all out:

Damore put together his infamous memo. The gist, if you don't know, was that inside Google, like many big engineering companies, there was a big push to get more women involved, out of the misguided belief that if things aren't 50:50, that's a problem. Damore's memo basically said "look at all this research showing that men and women have different interests; I think this is probably a big factor nobody's considering". This was foolish of him, because even though he's right, everyone can see that the progressives behind this effort aren't amenable to reason, and this is just a third rail.

Damore goes and shops his draft memo around to various corners of the company, soliciting feedback. I was one of the first people who got a chance to read it, and saw several versions. Feedback was what I said above: this isn't going to make people happy, but you are right.

At some point, the company's progressive activist core [1] noticed this, and blew it up, making a big deal within the company. Management noticed, but their policy at that time was to basically ignore it and let it boil over, since the progressives were more or less always making a stink, and it was only a matter of time until something else came along to be the new thing.

Unhappy to see that management wasn't heeding their calls to have Damore publicly flogged, they leaked an earlier draft of the memo to the press (Buzzfeed, if my memory serves correctly). Because this was done in bad faith, they edited the memo first, mostly to remove graphs, citations, and other evidence so as to give the appearance that Damore was simply pulling stuff out of his ass, as opposed to this being carefully research, and evidence-backed.

Now that it was causing a national news cycle [2], management felt they had to do something. So they fired Damore for "causing strife among employees" (or some similar reasoning). Since he didn't leak it, they couldn't use that justification. Of course, the activists who spread the memo from being tentatively shared with a small group to plastering it on every wall? Were they punished? No, of course not.

So how am I so sure it's Fong-Jones? She was either the first or second to try blowing up the memo internally. She was the champion of calling for Damore's head. When the leak was published [3], Buzzfeed included interview commentary from her. Fong-Jones had spoken w/o company permission to the press repeatedly, and there were other leaked documents that also somehow came to be associated with her too [4].

I do sometimes wonder why HR didn't crack down on her. It's possible they sent warnings and she flagrantly ignored them. That said, HR was also the one pushing the 50:50 ratio being a goal-that's-never-explicitly-stated-because-that-would-actually-be-illegal. Having dealt with Google on several sensitive subjects, they were (at that time) very sensitive to be seen trying to shut down any conversations, and for any hot-button debate, they would have a preferred party they would silently root for. In this case, that party was the activists, up until the leak, and then they went and fired Damore to make it look (to the NYT-reading public) like they'd done something. If nobody had leaked it, they would've ignored it.

Okay, this did end up being 40 mins. Ah well.

PS - While typing this out, I thought of one other Fong-Jones anecdote. Somebody put together, presumably for whichever month is supposed to be for women's history, a big stylized posterboard with various notable female employees on it. Fong-Jones was on this list, because it was produced by some progressive sympathetic to the activists. The funny thing is that each person's picture had their name, and their notable accomplishment. Things like inventing new technologies, launching well-known products, and the like. What did Fong-Jones do to justify inclusion? She was labeled "SRE extraordinaire". A site reliability engineer (SRE) is just a job role. Do you really think that she was just so good at her job to deserve accolades from among the company's thousands of SREs? No, she was put there because the list-creator was a progressive who liked her activism, but knew that highlighting her habit of talking to the press w/o permission and causing a fuss internally wasn't something they should be announcing on a poster.

---

[1] I call them a "core" because they were organized, had their chat servers outside of the company, and so on. When they'd get on about something or other, they would coordinate things like posting / upvoting questions for the company all-hands, leaving comments and making memes to push the target agenda, and so on. On one delightful occasion, while I was parrying them in the internal listserv, they sent some rando to try distracting me with emails attempting to concern troll me. The funny bit is when I called him out for only being there to attempt to waste my time, he admitted to it. Like yo, if you're going to be a bad-faith actor, you got to commit to the lie!

[2] Google's employee training material tries dissuading people from making brash statements internally, asking menacingly how you would feel if it ended up on the front page of the New York Times. The problem with this strategy was that there were too many employees who would regard this as a badge of honor. I wanted to, but never got around to, suggest to HR that they update the guideline to be "NYT or Breitbart", so that the activists at least would think twice.

[3] For completeness, I will add that a copy of the memo was also leaked to Breitbart. I am 90% sure of who that is, but it's a name nobody would recognize because this individual feared for their career and never gave comments to the press. Why did they do it? Because they wanted a copy with the graphs / citations attached so that the public record would be complete.

[4] There's another story about an AI ethics board, but that's for another time.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
 
1774562550607.png

From the thread made by Joshua, I came across this message by ms. Fong-Jones.

This strikes me as being very much a rookie mistake; one which could have easily been remedied by some sound precautions.

Norm had this figured out via his constructed "safeword", which he developed as he ventured into the world of sadism and masochism:


"BOOOOOOORIIIIIIING!"

Truly, a great lesson.
 
Toxic BRAAAAP Mask powiedział(a):
Archive for funsies
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Megalodon is fresh as fuck, nice looking archives live there.
Merton J. Dingle powiedział(a):
Someone that claims to have worked alongside Blockhead believes that he was the one responsible for leaking the James Demore memo from years ago:

https://www.reddit.com/r/BlockedAndReported/comments/1rto2oj/comment/oaunerv/?context=3
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Archive II | Archive III
ETA:
Those comments under the archived post are a great read:
Old Reddit Comments Elliot.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Dreamland powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 8766687
Is advertising his hypochondria a recent thing or is he just advertizing useless crap?
Sorry i only know of this faggot because he (basically) runs Cloudflare and popularises the DMCA datamining trick.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

He has admitted to an autoimmune disorder in the past, there’s speculation that he has HIV because of his proximity to the San Francisco-based Joy Luck Club, a support group for LGBTQ+ Asians and Pacific Islanders who are HIV+, and he also posted about his autoimmune scleritis on Twitter prior to Musk’s buyout and the rebranding to X. He also proudly boasted about getting 8 COVID boosters. In all candour, the perceived hypochondria may very well be legitimate worry because of his health.
 
Eight Covid boosters is enough to give you an autoimmune condition its on its own, and suppression of T in men is also a kneecap to immunity and inflammation control. Every choice Erriot has made is him digging his own grave, and why he wants to lash out at literal who's on the on Internet.
 
Wyróżnienie
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole