🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

Wouldnt it be an ironic twist of fate if he ends up having to suck dick with his mush mouth to get some cash?

That would make Russell into a sort of pseudo-troon whore. Troons become the girlfriends they couldn't get, Greeeee becomes the whore he always wanted to control. It's very poetic, in a very disturbing and twisted way.
 
Russ did not pay the filing fee, but instead filed an "Emergency Motion for Stay." It is unavailable for now. Working on it
Wyświetl załącznik 8760593

Edit: available now. Uploaded
So Russ is claiming Schaefer lied about Russ being unemployed. Only days before though, Russ provided the court with his unemployment claim saying he was entitled to unemployment except for deficient work hours.

These can't both be true. He has to disclose his gig worker income on his unemployment application and it would offset any amount he is entitled to.
 
Crusty has approximately 3:20 minutes to get his "Undo My Ass Being Throw Out Onto The Street" motion approved before he is fucked until tomorrow.
 
And we have citations! Citations are back!
Rodriguez v. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 798 (2004)
This is a case affirming a contempt finding for not paying 10K in child support.

Rodriguez v. Second Judicial District Court, No. 81219-COA (Nev. App. 2020)
This is definitely the one he had intended to cite above. Different Rodriguez, involves an eviction.
" genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Golden Apartments properly terminated her subsidy, and thus whether rent was actually owed"
The court already found that Greer did not raise a genuine issue of material fact.

Then he does his Legal Argument again. Assume it has the same problem as before.

"NRS 40.385(2) provides that a stay of execution shall be obtained upon the filing of a $250bond. Appellant attempted to comply with this statute in good faith. However, the DistrictCourt’s refusal to honor this bond—and its affirmative order to return the funds to Appellant—stripped him of his statutory right to a stay. This procedural error created the very "emergency"the Court now faces: an eviction executed while an appellant was actively attempting to securethe mandatory statutory stay."
You got the stay. They affirmed the lower court order and vacated the stay.
 
If only the Catholic Church told Martin Luther they did get anything on their door...

Outside of terrible 1980s sitcoms of course.
Dude I'd totally watch a Russel Greer and Acerthon sitcom. Throw Shaefer in there and they could call it My Two Litigeous Retards

boomer zoomed for informational purposes

Wyświetl załącznik 8761310
Constable Gesundheit
 
I'm hopeful that even though Schaefer knows he'll never collect that he files a small claims suit against Greer. Back rent, cleaning fees, etc.
Greer is going to attempt to sue him in Federal Court. Guaranteed. He will fail. But he will make the attempt. Then appeal it 12x. Greer is nothing if not predictable. He's the Gift that keeps on giving.
 
His argument of NRAP 25(c)(2)(B), is bullshit. It says absolutely nothing about continued agreement for service by e-mail just because he agreed to such in a previous case in another court.
It's not even clear that there was "written consent" to electronic service in the previous case. Russ wrote:
Consent to Electronic Service: Pursuant to NRAP 25(c)(2)(B), the parties have previously
consented in writing to service by electronic means through their ongoing course of conduct and
written communication in District Court Case No. A-24-941323-A and Las Vegas Justice Court.
A "ongoing course of conduct" is very different than consenting "in writing."

I don't think Schaeffer technically appeared in District Court, it was just Russ appealing & the judge telling him to fuck off.

And a glance through the Justice Court complaint (which I think is the only thing Schaeffer filed) doesn't have anything about agreeing to electronic service, unless I'm missing something or there was a separate case intake form with a checkbox for that.

Edit: Further, the parties "ongoing course of conduct and written communication" being electronic is contradicted by Russ's previous claims that service of the eviction notice was deficient because the unsigned version was posted to his door (the judge ruled it wasn't deficient). All official service up to this point has been physical, not electronic.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Greer is going to attempt to sue him in Federal Court. Guaranteed. He will fail. But he will make the attempt. Then appeal it 12x. Greer is nothing if not predictable. He's the Gift that keeps on giving.
Don't forget the constables that deprived him of his home without due process or 24 hour notice! They were in collusion to deprive him of rights!! I want to read that so bad.
 
THE MINIMUM PENALTY FOR UNLAWFUL BREAKING INTO VACANT PROPERTY (NRS 205.0813) OR UNLAWFUL OCCUPANCY OF REAL PROPERTY (NRS 205.8017) IS A SENTENCE OF UP TO ONE YEAR IN THE COUNTY JAIL, A FINE OF UP TO $2,000, OR BOTH. SUBSEQUENT OFFENSES ARE SUBJECT TO SENTENCING FOR A CATEGORY D FELONY WITH A SENTENCE OF 1-4 YEARS IN STATE PRISON, A FINE OF UP TO $5,000, OR BOTH.
Hey, all he needs to do to get housing is trespass!
 
My nigga loves his materially false statements.
Screenshot_20260326-205928.OneDrive.png
 
Russ did not pay the filing fee, but instead filed an "Emergency Motion for Stay." It is unavailable for now. Working on it
Wyświetl załącznik 8760593

Edit: available now. Uploaded
I was going to ask if filing a motion insisting they let you back into the apartment you've just been evicted from is the ultimate motion to undo thing that was already done, but then he went and filed another after being told to fuck off. Absolute madman

I love them tossing his bullshit on technical grounds instead of the merits because it gives him the tiny bit of hope that if he just learns to fucking serve someone properly maybe it'll work this time, thus ensuring yet more plightsperging.
 
It makes me so happy to know that right now, at this very moment, Russell is flailing about in his car, submitting unhinged motions to the Nevada Supreme Court, without any of his belongings and barely a penny to his name. Right now, Russell is beyond defeated and miserable, and I am beyond elated.

Bout TIME, bitch!
 
It makes me so happy to know that right now, at this very moment, Russell is flailing about in his car, submitting unhinged motions to the Nevada Supreme Court, without any of his belongings and barely a penny to his name. Right now, Russell is beyond defeated and miserable, and I am beyond elated.

Bout TIME, bitch!
I wonder how long he can Uber people around in his homeless shit mobile before the smells make it untenable?
 
He is claiming he's employed "in the gig-share economy... and was prepared to pay weekly rent into the court". If he's got weekly rent money, then he's got cheap ass motel money.
His wages are already earmarked for Brothel and Whore related purposes. They don't count.
 
The doc is super secret so I can't actually see it yet
They finally made it public. Russ needs to pay them $250
Screenshot_20260326_234336_Firefox.jpg
Interestingly, Supreme Court does not consider this as an appeal but as an "original writ proceeding". In that case they might have some limited jurisdiction
 

Załączniki

Wstecz
Top Na dole