I will try, but I don't control the judge.
Works for Russel Greer though. For some reason.
There's a convergence of circumstances in that case that may not be applicable anywhere else.
This bit seems particularly relevant.
Edit: forgot the footnote
The justice system would be great if it weren't for all the judges.
Sounds like they're arguing fair use is an affirmative defence against the subpoenas directly, which makes a lot of sense. If the material in question is fair use, then the subpoena is frivolous, as there would be no gain from uncovering and suing the anonymous party.
We are all rooting for you Null, take my money and give him hell.
Luckily I have OPSEC and got a throwaway email and use brave for this. Imagine just a single post me referencing south park gets Elliot to try and dox me. Pathetic.
One of mine was leaked. anominous@national.shitposting.agency
Luckily I've changed emails ever since before this like twice and none of them link to me. And his subpoena would only grab onto the current one given the stipulations of it.
He just wants to dox as many people as possible and invade their lives as much as possible because he's a litigious sexpest freak. That's it. Power and control is the only thing he cares about.
Wow, he sounds like a faggot. All I did was make a joke in passing and you're getting lawyers thrown your way. Luckily I'm not really going to care about some sexpest. I've followed the OPSEC rules as I could, hoping my stuff has worked at least somewhat, so he's not particularly going to get that much info even if he does.
Huh, that's what rapists are all about, what a coincidence.
What I wonder (and if this has been answered rate me late and gay) is: Who took the picture of Dong Gone? Because if he paid someone to take that, the copyright on the original may (if there was a contract, and if the contract stated as such) lay with the photographer, not with him. (Portrait photogs and wedding photographers commonly do this AFAIK.)
LFJ put a copyright notice on the photo itself. You are correct that LFJ may be a dumb chink who didn’t realize that the headshot photographer owns the copyright.
As mentioned in the first post he's claiming, it was a professional photographer troon named Zackary Drucker. But as part of the actual copyright registration, Drucker transferred copyright to LFJ. I assume that's a mostly normal process, a photographer has original copyright over their creative work, and the client can request it be transferred or include that as part of hiring them.
While Elliot is likely mentally deficient, there are apparently valid copyright registrations included with some of the documents.
