Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

Got any more on the EU RRF? It sounds interesting!
Pop over to the old EU Referendum site (now retired for obvious reasons) and poke around. I've linked a search for articles on the rapid reaction force. Richard North had a lot to say about military procurement in this country, none of it particularly approving. We've been a wreck in that regard for sixty years or more.

But what I don't understand is why the UK has decided to cripple itself in such a manner? Were the Vulcan bombers really that expensive?
Yes. Vulcan was ahead of its time, design wise, but its mission profile was tied to the days before viable ICBMs, when the first strike expectation was that a high speed, high performance bomber would nip in to Russia as fast as possible, drop its bombs, and then try not to die on the way home. The moment it was possible to put a nuclear missile in a submarine, they were relegated to conventional bombing, a role to which they were not well suited at all. They were obsolete long before they were retired. Vulcan was only used in Operation Black Buck because the RAF had no other aircraft capable of flying the mission, but it pushed them well beyond their operational limits.

What confuses me, an American, the most is that many in power (mostly labor and greens) seem to think they have the power and influence they once had.
Oh believe me, it confuses us as well. The problem seems to be that Westminster is soaked in the trappings of Empire, and the City gives us an outsized influence over finance and commerce (nearly all maritime insurance still runs through London, for instance), so I suppose it affects the mind of anyone who spends enough time there. They want to decolonise everything now, seemingly working from the same belief that the UK is supremely powerful but in the opposite direction. It's all a bit silly.

I've derailed long enough. I should have been in bed hours ago.
 
The reason we can't afford even this smaller fleet is because Britain isn't an empire any more. We don't have the resources to afford to run the sort of enormous fleet the USA has (arguably we couldn't ever afford it, but it's hard to argue budgets in the midst of total war), nor do we have the need of such a huge fleet, as our prior de-facto position as the world police and guarantor of the sea lanes was pretty much ceded to the United States in the 1950s.
The reason you cant afford a Navy is not because you arent an empire. If you spent half of what you spend on the NHS on the RN the fleet would be pretty decent. The Republic of Singapore Navy has 40 warships to the UKs 72, and they are a city state with a population smaller then greater Londons.
 
"The Jews and their American lapdogs have only killed the original guy and one replacement here."

"Okay, tell them this position has three replacements lined up."

"This one, we're on the fifth guy already."

"Okay, that position has seven replacements lined up."

"Wait... now we're on the sixth guy."

"Whatever, still not the seventh. All good."
1000004503.jpg
>muslims are politically irrelevant because there are few of them
this is not true
I wanted to just say "Mamdani and Mahmood" and leave it at that. A literal quran-sworn sandnigger is the mayor of New York City in a post-9/11 America.
 
I think people forget that until thatcher came in the uk was in constant financial crisis for years post wwii. They ordered so many projects but cancelled due to cost and changing technology that the Vulcans were using wwii technology for a nuclear bomber until retirement. There is the thunderbolt issue but a British kiwi could explain more. Also Suez and Aden buckbroke the armed forces for a generation.
 
It is concerned with Israel and the Saudis, not France or Germany.
Is that why their nation's creation started with stealing Anglo-Iranian and Dutch Shell property? Because they weren't concerned with you?

"You guys, we just want to control the most important region for trade in the world. It won't go any further, we swear. Please ignore all our international state-sponsored terror." :optimistic:
 
I like how Kent is shameless enough to use his dead wife as a shield in his resignation letter, even when very easily findable quotes like these exist.

So dumb.
What coincidental timing that I just happened to see this.
No idea who this guy is, so it could just be some bullshit clickbait, but I wouldn't be shocked if it were real at this point. The IRGC already humiliated him when he apologized to the Gulf States for bombing them.
Wyświetl załącznik 8716578
Source | Archive
Regardless of if he has info, it's such a bad take.

Regime falls if there is a color revolution. There can't be a color revolution while bombings continue.

Forecasting cracks is just not doable at this point, so much can happen between when our Operations end and when a popular uprising could happen.
 
Islam/Poohands be like: "How do you do, fellow white men? If you don't agree that bombing brown people is bad then you must be a JEW!!! the best future for us is the fall of the American Empire, amirite? Haha, BRICS will rule the world one day, just as the founders intended. Praise be to the prophet Jesus, see you in Valhalla!"
*just as the founding mothers intended. What are you, a bigot?!
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole